{ "ok": true, "title": "Card Intelligence Feed And Scoring Model", "updated": "2026-07-19T09:15:50.215Z", "boundary": "This feed provides research routing, scoring context, relationship-source rules and speculative rationale. It is not an accusation system and does not assert guilt, intent, hidden control or unlawful conduct.", "model": { "scoreType": "research relevance and update priority", "dimensions": [ "publicRole", "networkReach", "updatePriority", "evidenceRoute", "narrativeSignal", "relationshipRoute" ], "confidence": [ "high", "medium", "watch" ], "rule": "Scores guide where readers and editors should look first. They do not prove claims." }, "sourceRelationshipRules": { "rule": "Only add relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Never use rumor or guilt by association.", "acceptedSources": [ "official page", "public record", "public database", "public filing", "annual report", "archive page", "reliable report with clear source attribution" ], "rejectedSources": [ "unsourced social media claim", "rumor", "private personal data", "doxxing", "guilt by association", "anonymous allegation without documents" ] }, "totals": { "cards": 468, "decks": 9 }, "cards": [ { "id": "elon-musk", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 1, "name": "Elon Musk", "suit": "Coins", "score": 100, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/elon-musk.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 100, "networkReach": 100, "updatePriority": 100, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 98, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Elon Musk is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 100/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Elon Musk unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 100, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Elon Musk." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "jeff-bezos", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 2, "name": "Jeff Bezos", "suit": "Coins", "score": 100, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/jeff-bezos.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 100, "networkReach": 100, "updatePriority": 100, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 98, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Jeff Bezos is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 100/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Jeff Bezos unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 100, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Jeff Bezos." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "world-health-organization", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 3, "name": "World Health Organization", "suit": "Masks", "score": 100, "lane": "narrative / belief power", "route": "people-of-interest/world-health-organization.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 100, "networkReach": 100, "updatePriority": 100, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 98, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "World Health Organization is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward narrative / belief power. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 100/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for World Health Organization unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 100, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to World Health Organization." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "federal-reserve", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 4, "name": "Federal Reserve", "suit": "Masks", "score": 100, "lane": "narrative / belief power", "route": "people-of-interest/federal-reserve.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 100, "networkReach": 100, "updatePriority": 100, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 98, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Federal Reserve is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward narrative / belief power. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 100/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Federal Reserve unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 100, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Federal Reserve." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "caci-international", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 5, "name": "CACI International", "suit": "Masks", "score": 100, "lane": "narrative / belief power", "route": "people-of-interest/caci-international.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 100, "networkReach": 100, "updatePriority": 100, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 98, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "CACI International is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward narrative / belief power. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 100/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for CACI International unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 100, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to CACI International." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "booz-allen-hamilton", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 6, "name": "Booz Allen Hamilton", "suit": "Masks", "score": 100, "lane": "narrative / belief power", "route": "people-of-interest/booz-allen-hamilton.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 100, "networkReach": 100, "updatePriority": 100, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 98, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Booz Allen Hamilton is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward narrative / belief power. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 100/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Booz Allen Hamilton unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 100, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Booz Allen Hamilton." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "larry-fink", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 7, "name": "Larry Fink", "suit": "Coins", "score": 98, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/larry-fink.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 98, "networkReach": 99, "updatePriority": 98, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 96, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Larry Fink is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 98/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Larry Fink unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 98, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Larry Fink." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "klaus-schwab", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 8, "name": "Klaus Schwab", "suit": "Masks", "score": 94, "lane": "narrative / belief power", "route": "people-of-interest/klaus-schwab.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 94, "networkReach": 95, "updatePriority": 94, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 92, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Klaus Schwab is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward narrative / belief power. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 94/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Klaus Schwab unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 94, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Klaus Schwab." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "emmanuel-macron", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 9, "name": "Emmanuel Macron", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 90, "lane": "governance / state power", "route": "people-of-interest/emmanuel-macron.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 90, "networkReach": 91, "updatePriority": 90, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 88, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Emmanuel Macron is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward governance / state power. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 90/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Emmanuel Macron unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 90, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Emmanuel Macron." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "tony-blair", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 10, "name": "Tony Blair", "suit": "Masks", "score": 88, "lane": "narrative / belief power", "route": "people-of-interest/tony-blair.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 88, "networkReach": 89, "updatePriority": 80, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 86, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Tony Blair is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward narrative / belief power. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 88/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Tony Blair unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 88, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Tony Blair." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "jamie-dimon", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 11, "name": "Jamie Dimon", "suit": "Coins", "score": 85, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/jamie-dimon.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 85, "networkReach": 86, "updatePriority": 77, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 83, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Jamie Dimon is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 85/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Jamie Dimon unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 85, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Jamie Dimon." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "jerome-powell", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 12, "name": "Jerome Powell", "suit": "Coins", "score": 84, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/jerome-powell.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Jerome Powell is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Jerome Powell unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Jerome Powell." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "jensen-huang", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 13, "name": "Jensen Huang", "suit": "Coins", "score": 83, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/jensen-huang.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 83, "networkReach": 84, "updatePriority": 75, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 81, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Jensen Huang is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 83/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Jensen Huang unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 83, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Jensen Huang." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "christine-lagarde", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 14, "name": "Christine Lagarde", "suit": "Coins", "score": 83, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/christine-lagarde.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 83, "networkReach": 84, "updatePriority": 75, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 81, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Christine Lagarde is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 83/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Christine Lagarde unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 83, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Christine Lagarde." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "pope-francis", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 15, "name": "Pope Francis", "suit": "Masks", "score": 82, "lane": "narrative / belief power", "route": "people-of-interest/pope-francis.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Pope Francis is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward narrative / belief power. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Pope Francis unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Pope Francis." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "king-charles-iii", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 16, "name": "King Charles III", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 82, "lane": "governance / state power", "route": "people-of-interest/king-charles-iii.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "King Charles III is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward governance / state power. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for King Charles III unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to King Charles III." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "erik-prince", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 17, "name": "Erik Prince", "suit": "Swords", "score": 81, "lane": "security / contractor power", "route": "people-of-interest/erik-prince.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 81, "networkReach": 82, "updatePriority": 73, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 79, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Erik Prince is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward security / contractor power. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 81/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Erik Prince unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 81, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Erik Prince." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bill-gates", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 18, "name": "Bill Gates", "suit": "Coins", "score": 80, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/bill-gates.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Bill Gates is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Bill Gates unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Bill Gates." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "sam-altman", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 19, "name": "Sam Altman", "suit": "Masks", "score": 80, "lane": "narrative / belief power", "route": "people-of-interest/sam-altman.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Sam Altman is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward narrative / belief power. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Sam Altman unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Sam Altman." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "sundar-pichai", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 20, "name": "Sundar Pichai", "suit": "Masks", "score": 79, "lane": "narrative / belief power", "route": "people-of-interest/sundar-pichai.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 79, "networkReach": 80, "updatePriority": 71, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 77, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Sundar Pichai is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward narrative / belief power. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 79/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Sundar Pichai unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 79, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Sundar Pichai." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "satya-nadella", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 21, "name": "Satya Nadella", "suit": "Masks", "score": 78, "lane": "narrative / belief power", "route": "people-of-interest/satya-nadella.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Satya Nadella is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward narrative / belief power. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Satya Nadella unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Satya Nadella." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "tim-cook", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 22, "name": "Tim Cook", "suit": "Coins", "score": 77, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/tim-cook.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 77, "networkReach": 78, "updatePriority": 69, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 75, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Tim Cook is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 77/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Tim Cook unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 77, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Tim Cook." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "george-soros", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 23, "name": "George Soros", "suit": "Masks", "score": 74, "lane": "narrative / belief power", "route": "people-of-interest/george-soros.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 74, "networkReach": 75, "updatePriority": 66, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 72, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "George Soros is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward narrative / belief power. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 74/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for George Soros unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 74, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to George Soros." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "mukesh-ambani", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 24, "name": "Mukesh Ambani", "suit": "Coins", "score": 72, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/mukesh-ambani.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 72, "networkReach": 73, "updatePriority": 64, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 70, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Mukesh Ambani is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 72/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Mukesh Ambani unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 72, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Mukesh Ambani." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "xi-jinping", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 25, "name": "Xi Jinping", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 72, "lane": "governance / state power", "route": "people-of-interest/xi-jinping.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 72, "networkReach": 73, "updatePriority": 64, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 70, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Xi Jinping is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward governance / state power. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 72/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Xi Jinping unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 72, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Xi Jinping." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "narendra-modi", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 26, "name": "Narendra Modi", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 71, "lane": "governance / state power", "route": "people-of-interest/narendra-modi.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 71, "networkReach": 72, "updatePriority": 63, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 69, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Narendra Modi is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward governance / state power. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 71/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Narendra Modi unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 71, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Narendra Modi." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "vladimir-putin", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 27, "name": "Vladimir Putin", "suit": "Swords", "score": 71, "lane": "security / contractor power", "route": "people-of-interest/vladimir-putin.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 71, "networkReach": 72, "updatePriority": 63, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 69, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Vladimir Putin is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward security / contractor power. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 71/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Vladimir Putin unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 71, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Vladimir Putin." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "benjamin-netanyahu", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 28, "name": "Benjamin Netanyahu", "suit": "Swords", "score": 70, "lane": "security / contractor power", "route": "people-of-interest/benjamin-netanyahu.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 70, "networkReach": 71, "updatePriority": 62, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 68, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Benjamin Netanyahu is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward security / contractor power. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 70/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Benjamin Netanyahu unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 70, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Benjamin Netanyahu." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "volodymyr-zelenskyy", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 29, "name": "Volodymyr Zelenskyy", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 69, "lane": "governance / state power", "route": "people-of-interest/volodymyr-zelenskyy.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 69, "networkReach": 70, "updatePriority": 61, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 67, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Volodymyr Zelenskyy is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward governance / state power. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 69/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Volodymyr Zelenskyy unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 69, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Volodymyr Zelenskyy." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "giorgia-meloni", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 30, "name": "Giorgia Meloni", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 68, "lane": "governance / state power", "route": "people-of-interest/giorgia-meloni.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 68, "networkReach": 69, "updatePriority": 60, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 66, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Giorgia Meloni is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward governance / state power. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 68/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Giorgia Meloni unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 68, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Giorgia Meloni." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "gautam-adani", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 31, "name": "Gautam Adani", "suit": "Coins", "score": 67, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/gautam-adani.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 67, "networkReach": 68, "updatePriority": 59, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 65, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Gautam Adani is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 67/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Gautam Adani unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 67, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Gautam Adani." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "ray-dalio", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 32, "name": "Ray Dalio", "suit": "Coins", "score": 66, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/ray-dalio.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 66, "networkReach": 67, "updatePriority": 58, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 64, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Ray Dalio is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 66/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Ray Dalio unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 66, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Ray Dalio." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "brian-moynihan", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 33, "name": "Brian Moynihan", "suit": "Coins", "score": 65, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/brian-moynihan.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 65, "networkReach": 66, "updatePriority": 57, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 63, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Brian Moynihan is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 65/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Brian Moynihan unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 65, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Brian Moynihan." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "david-solomon", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 34, "name": "David Solomon", "suit": "Coins", "score": 65, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/david-solomon.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 65, "networkReach": 66, "updatePriority": 57, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 63, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "David Solomon is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 65/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for David Solomon unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 65, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to David Solomon." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "jane-fraser", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 35, "name": "Jane Fraser", "suit": "Coins", "score": 65, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/jane-fraser.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 65, "networkReach": 66, "updatePriority": 57, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 63, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Jane Fraser is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 65/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Jane Fraser unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 65, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Jane Fraser." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "ajay-banga", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 36, "name": "Ajay Banga", "suit": "Coins", "score": 65, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/ajay-banga.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 65, "networkReach": 66, "updatePriority": 57, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 63, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Ajay Banga is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 65/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Ajay Banga unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 65, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Ajay Banga." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "kristalina-georgieva", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 37, "name": "Kristalina Georgieva", "suit": "Coins", "score": 65, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/kristalina-georgieva.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 65, "networkReach": 66, "updatePriority": 57, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 63, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Kristalina Georgieva is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 65/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Kristalina Georgieva unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 65, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Kristalina Georgieva." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "tedros-adhanom-ghebreyesus", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 38, "name": "Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus", "suit": "Masks", "score": 65, "lane": "narrative / belief power", "route": "people-of-interest/tedros-adhanom-ghebreyesus.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 65, "networkReach": 66, "updatePriority": 57, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 63, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward narrative / belief power. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 65/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 65, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "ant-nio-guterres", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 39, "name": "António Guterres", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 65, "lane": "governance / state power", "route": "people-of-interest/ant-nio-guterres.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 65, "networkReach": 66, "updatePriority": 57, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 63, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "António Guterres is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward governance / state power. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 65/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for António Guterres unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 65, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to António Guterres." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "mark-rutte", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 40, "name": "Mark Rutte", "suit": "Swords", "score": 64, "lane": "security / contractor power", "route": "people-of-interest/mark-rutte.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 64, "networkReach": 65, "updatePriority": 56, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 62, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Mark Rutte is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward security / contractor power. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 64/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Mark Rutte unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 64, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Mark Rutte." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "jens-stoltenberg", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 41, "name": "Jens Stoltenberg", "suit": "Swords", "score": 63, "lane": "security / contractor power", "route": "people-of-interest/jens-stoltenberg.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 63, "networkReach": 64, "updatePriority": 55, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 61, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Jens Stoltenberg is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward security / contractor power. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 63/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Jens Stoltenberg unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 63, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Jens Stoltenberg." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "alex-karp", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 42, "name": "Alex Karp", "suit": "Swords", "score": 63, "lane": "security / contractor power", "route": "people-of-interest/alex-karp.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 63, "networkReach": 64, "updatePriority": 55, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 61, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Alex Karp is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward security / contractor power. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 63/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Alex Karp unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 63, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Alex Karp." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "miriam-adelson", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 43, "name": "Miriam Adelson", "suit": "Coins", "score": 62, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/miriam-adelson.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 62, "networkReach": 63, "updatePriority": 54, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 60, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Miriam Adelson is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 62/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Miriam Adelson unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 62, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Miriam Adelson." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "rupert-murdoch", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 44, "name": "Rupert Murdoch", "suit": "Masks", "score": 62, "lane": "narrative / belief power", "route": "people-of-interest/rupert-murdoch.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 62, "networkReach": 63, "updatePriority": 54, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 60, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Rupert Murdoch is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward narrative / belief power. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 62/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Rupert Murdoch unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 62, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Rupert Murdoch." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "laurene-powell-jobs", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 45, "name": "Laurene Powell Jobs", "suit": "Masks", "score": 61, "lane": "narrative / belief power", "route": "people-of-interest/laurene-powell-jobs.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 61, "networkReach": 62, "updatePriority": 53, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 59, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Laurene Powell Jobs is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward narrative / belief power. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 61/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Laurene Powell Jobs unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 61, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Laurene Powell Jobs." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "mark-zuckerberg", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 46, "name": "Mark Zuckerberg", "suit": "Coins", "score": 60, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/mark-zuckerberg.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 60, "networkReach": 61, "updatePriority": 52, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 58, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Mark Zuckerberg is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 60/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Mark Zuckerberg unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 60, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Mark Zuckerberg." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "larry-ellison", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 47, "name": "Larry Ellison", "suit": "Coins", "score": 60, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/larry-ellison.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 60, "networkReach": 61, "updatePriority": 52, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 58, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Larry Ellison is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 60/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Larry Ellison unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 60, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Larry Ellison." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "peter-thiel", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 48, "name": "Peter Thiel", "suit": "Coins", "score": 60, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/peter-thiel.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 60, "networkReach": 61, "updatePriority": 52, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 58, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Peter Thiel is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 60/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Peter Thiel unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 60, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Peter Thiel." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "michael-bloomberg", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 49, "name": "Michael Bloomberg", "suit": "Coins", "score": 60, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/michael-bloomberg.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 60, "networkReach": 61, "updatePriority": 52, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 58, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Michael Bloomberg is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 60/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Michael Bloomberg unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 60, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Michael Bloomberg." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "warren-buffett", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 50, "name": "Warren Buffett", "suit": "Coins", "score": 60, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/warren-buffett.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 60, "networkReach": 61, "updatePriority": 52, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 58, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Warren Buffett is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 60/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Warren Buffett unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 60, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Warren Buffett." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "mackenzie-scott", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 51, "name": "MacKenzie Scott", "suit": "Masks", "score": 60, "lane": "narrative / belief power", "route": "people-of-interest/mackenzie-scott.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 60, "networkReach": 61, "updatePriority": 52, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 58, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "MacKenzie Scott is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward narrative / belief power. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 60/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for MacKenzie Scott unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 60, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to MacKenzie Scott." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "priscilla-chan", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 52, "name": "Priscilla Chan", "suit": "Masks", "score": 60, "lane": "narrative / belief power", "route": "people-of-interest/priscilla-chan.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 60, "networkReach": 61, "updatePriority": 52, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 58, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Priscilla Chan is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward narrative / belief power. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 60/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Priscilla Chan unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 60, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Priscilla Chan." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "alex-jones", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 1, "name": "Alex Jones", "suit": "Masks", "score": 96, "lane": "conspiracy media / outrage engine", "route": "controlled-opposition/alex-jones.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 96, "networkReach": 97, "updatePriority": 96, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 94, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Alex Jones is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward conspiracy media / outrage engine. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 96/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Alex Jones unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 96, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Alex Jones." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "andrew-tate", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 2, "name": "Andrew Tate", "suit": "Coins", "score": 94, "lane": "manosphere / masculinity culture-war", "route": "controlled-opposition/andrew-tate.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 94, "networkReach": 95, "updatePriority": 94, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 92, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Andrew Tate is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward manosphere / masculinity culture-war. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 94/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Andrew Tate unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 94, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Andrew Tate." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "mark-sargent", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 3, "name": "Mark Sargent", "suit": "Mirrors", "score": 72, "lane": "flat earth / cosmology opposition", "route": "controlled-opposition/mark-sargent.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 72, "networkReach": 73, "updatePriority": 64, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 70, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Mark Sargent is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward flat earth / cosmology opposition. The Mirrors suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 72/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Mark Sargent unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 72, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Mark Sargent." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "david-icke", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 4, "name": "David Icke", "suit": "Mirrors", "score": 90, "lane": "conspiracy / spiritual politics", "route": "controlled-opposition/david-icke.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 90, "networkReach": 91, "updatePriority": 90, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 88, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "David Icke is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward conspiracy / spiritual politics. The Mirrors suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 90/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for David Icke unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 90, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to David Icke." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "russell-brand", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 5, "name": "Russell Brand", "suit": "Masks", "score": 88, "lane": "alternative media / spiritual populism", "route": "controlled-opposition/russell-brand.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 88, "networkReach": 89, "updatePriority": 80, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 86, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Russell Brand is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward alternative media / spiritual populism. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 88/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Russell Brand unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 88, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Russell Brand." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "joe-rogan", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 6, "name": "Joe Rogan", "suit": "Masks", "score": 92, "lane": "platform gate / open debate hub", "route": "controlled-opposition/joe-rogan.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 92, "networkReach": 93, "updatePriority": 92, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 90, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Joe Rogan is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward platform gate / open debate hub. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 92/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Joe Rogan unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 92, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Joe Rogan." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "tucker-carlson", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 7, "name": "Tucker Carlson", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 91, "lane": "mainstream-to-alt media bridge", "route": "controlled-opposition/tucker-carlson.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 91, "networkReach": 92, "updatePriority": 91, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 89, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Tucker Carlson is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward mainstream-to-alt media bridge. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 91/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Tucker Carlson unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 91, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Tucker Carlson." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "candace-owens", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 8, "name": "Candace Owens", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 82, "lane": "culture-war opposition", "route": "controlled-opposition/candace-owens.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Candace Owens is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward culture-war opposition. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Candace Owens unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Candace Owens." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "jordan-peterson", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 9, "name": "Jordan Peterson", "suit": "Mirrors", "score": 85, "lane": "intellectual opposition / psychology", "route": "controlled-opposition/jordan-peterson.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 85, "networkReach": 86, "updatePriority": 77, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 83, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Jordan Peterson is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward intellectual opposition / psychology. The Mirrors suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 85/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Jordan Peterson unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 85, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Jordan Peterson." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "ben-shapiro", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 10, "name": "Ben Shapiro", "suit": "Masks", "score": 84, "lane": "conservative opposition gate", "route": "controlled-opposition/ben-shapiro.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Ben Shapiro is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward conservative opposition gate. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Ben Shapiro unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Ben Shapiro." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "tim-pool", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 11, "name": "Tim Pool", "suit": "Masks", "score": 80, "lane": "independent media / civil-war narrative", "route": "controlled-opposition/tim-pool.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Tim Pool is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward independent media / civil-war narrative. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Tim Pool unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Tim Pool." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "steven-crowder", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 12, "name": "Steven Crowder", "suit": "Masks", "score": 76, "lane": "conservative media outrage", "route": "controlled-opposition/steven-crowder.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 76, "networkReach": 77, "updatePriority": 68, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 74, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Steven Crowder is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward conservative media outrage. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 76/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Steven Crowder unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 76, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Steven Crowder." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "charlie-kirk", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 13, "name": "Charlie Kirk", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 78, "lane": "youth politics / activist machine", "route": "controlled-opposition/charlie-kirk.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Charlie Kirk is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward youth politics / activist machine. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Charlie Kirk unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Charlie Kirk." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "matt-walsh", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 14, "name": "Matt Walsh", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 74, "lane": "culture-war moral gate", "route": "controlled-opposition/matt-walsh.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 74, "networkReach": 75, "updatePriority": 66, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 72, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Matt Walsh is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward culture-war moral gate. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 74/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Matt Walsh unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 74, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Matt Walsh." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "glenn-beck", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 15, "name": "Glenn Beck", "suit": "Masks", "score": 77, "lane": "legacy conspiracy-right bridge", "route": "controlled-opposition/glenn-beck.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 77, "networkReach": 78, "updatePriority": 69, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 75, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Glenn Beck is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward legacy conspiracy-right bridge. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 77/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Glenn Beck unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 77, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Glenn Beck." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "piers-morgan", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 16, "name": "Piers Morgan", "suit": "Masks", "score": 75, "lane": "mainstream debate gate", "route": "controlled-opposition/piers-morgan.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 75, "networkReach": 76, "updatePriority": 67, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 73, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Piers Morgan is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward mainstream debate gate. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 75/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Piers Morgan unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 75, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Piers Morgan." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "elon-musk", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 17, "name": "Elon Musk", "suit": "Coins", "score": 100, "lane": "free-speech platform paradox", "route": "controlled-opposition/elon-musk.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 100, "networkReach": 100, "updatePriority": 100, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 98, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Elon Musk is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward free-speech platform paradox. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 100/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Elon Musk unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 100, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Elon Musk." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "kanye-west-ye", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 18, "name": "Kanye West / Ye", "suit": "Masks", "score": 79, "lane": "celebrity disruption / symbolic opposition", "route": "controlled-opposition/kanye-west-ye.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 79, "networkReach": 80, "updatePriority": 71, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 77, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Kanye West / Ye is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward celebrity disruption / symbolic opposition. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 79/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Kanye West / Ye unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 79, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Kanye West / Ye." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "rfk-jr", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 19, "name": "RFK Jr.", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 89, "lane": "vaccine/state-health opposition", "route": "controlled-opposition/rfk-jr.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 89, "networkReach": 90, "updatePriority": 89, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 87, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "RFK Jr. is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward vaccine/state-health opposition. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 89/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for RFK Jr. unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 89, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to RFK Jr.." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "tulsi-gabbard", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 20, "name": "Tulsi Gabbard", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 81, "lane": "anti-war/state-security crossover", "route": "controlled-opposition/tulsi-gabbard.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 81, "networkReach": 82, "updatePriority": 73, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 79, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Tulsi Gabbard is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward anti-war/state-security crossover. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 81/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Tulsi Gabbard unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 81, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Tulsi Gabbard." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "vivek-ramaswamy", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 21, "name": "Vivek Ramaswamy", "suit": "Coins", "score": 78, "lane": "anti-woke corporate-politics crossover", "route": "controlled-opposition/vivek-ramaswamy.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Vivek Ramaswamy is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward anti-woke corporate-politics crossover. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Vivek Ramaswamy unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Vivek Ramaswamy." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "nigel-farage", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 22, "name": "Nigel Farage", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 82, "lane": "populist Brexit/media opposition", "route": "controlled-opposition/nigel-farage.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Nigel Farage is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward populist Brexit/media opposition. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Nigel Farage unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Nigel Farage." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "marine-le-pen", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 23, "name": "Marine Le Pen", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 78, "lane": "nationalist opposition gate", "route": "controlled-opposition/marine-le-pen.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Marine Le Pen is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward nationalist opposition gate. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Marine Le Pen unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Marine Le Pen." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "geert-wilders", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 24, "name": "Geert Wilders", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 76, "lane": "European populist opposition", "route": "controlled-opposition/geert-wilders.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 76, "networkReach": 77, "updatePriority": 68, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 74, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Geert Wilders is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward European populist opposition. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 76/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Geert Wilders unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 76, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Geert Wilders." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "javier-milei", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 25, "name": "Javier Milei", "suit": "Coins", "score": 80, "lane": "libertarian shock opposition", "route": "controlled-opposition/javier-milei.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Javier Milei is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward libertarian shock opposition. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Javier Milei unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Javier Milei." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "steve-bannon", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 26, "name": "Steve Bannon", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 86, "lane": "populist strategy / movement architect", "route": "controlled-opposition/steve-bannon.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 86, "networkReach": 87, "updatePriority": 78, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 84, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Steve Bannon is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward populist strategy / movement architect. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 86/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Steve Bannon unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 86, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Steve Bannon." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "roger-stone", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 27, "name": "Roger Stone", "suit": "Masks", "score": 77, "lane": "political dark-arts operator", "route": "controlled-opposition/roger-stone.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 77, "networkReach": 78, "updatePriority": 69, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 75, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Roger Stone is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward political dark-arts operator. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 77/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Roger Stone unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 77, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Roger Stone." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "milo-yiannopoulos", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 28, "name": "Milo Yiannopoulos", "suit": "Masks", "score": 68, "lane": "provocation/media disruption", "route": "controlled-opposition/milo-yiannopoulos.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 68, "networkReach": 69, "updatePriority": 60, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 66, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Milo Yiannopoulos is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward provocation/media disruption. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 68/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Milo Yiannopoulos unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 68, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Milo Yiannopoulos." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "nick-fuentes", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 29, "name": "Nick Fuentes", "suit": "Mirrors", "score": 70, "lane": "extremist edge / movement contamination risk", "route": "controlled-opposition/nick-fuentes.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 70, "networkReach": 71, "updatePriority": 62, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 68, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Nick Fuentes is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward extremist edge / movement contamination risk. The Mirrors suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 70/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Nick Fuentes unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 70, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Nick Fuentes." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "gavin-mcinnes", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 30, "name": "Gavin McInnes", "suit": "Masks", "score": 69, "lane": "alt-right/media provocation", "route": "controlled-opposition/gavin-mcinnes.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 69, "networkReach": 70, "updatePriority": 61, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 67, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Gavin McInnes is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward alt-right/media provocation. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 69/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Gavin McInnes unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 69, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Gavin McInnes." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "laura-loomer", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 31, "name": "Laura Loomer", "suit": "Masks", "score": 70, "lane": "outrage activism / censorship martyrdom", "route": "controlled-opposition/laura-loomer.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 70, "networkReach": 71, "updatePriority": 62, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 68, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Laura Loomer is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward outrage activism / censorship martyrdom. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 70/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Laura Loomer unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 70, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Laura Loomer." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "mike-cernovich", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 32, "name": "Mike Cernovich", "suit": "Mirrors", "score": 67, "lane": "Pizzagate-era online influence", "route": "controlled-opposition/mike-cernovich.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 67, "networkReach": 68, "updatePriority": 59, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 65, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Mike Cernovich is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward Pizzagate-era online influence. The Mirrors suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 67/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Mike Cernovich unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 67, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Mike Cernovich." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "jack-posobiec", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 33, "name": "Jack Posobiec", "suit": "Masks", "score": 73, "lane": "narrative warfare / online right", "route": "controlled-opposition/jack-posobiec.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 73, "networkReach": 74, "updatePriority": 65, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 71, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Jack Posobiec is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward narrative warfare / online right. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 73/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Jack Posobiec unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 73, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Jack Posobiec." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "james-o-keefe", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 34, "name": "James O'Keefe", "suit": "Masks", "score": 75, "lane": "undercover media opposition", "route": "controlled-opposition/james-o-keefe.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 75, "networkReach": 76, "updatePriority": 67, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 73, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "James O'Keefe is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward undercover media opposition. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 75/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for James O'Keefe unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 75, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to James O'Keefe." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "project-veritas-network", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 35, "name": "Project Veritas network", "suit": "Masks", "score": 74, "lane": "opposition media machine", "route": "controlled-opposition/project-veritas-network.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 74, "networkReach": 75, "updatePriority": 66, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 72, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Project Veritas network is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward opposition media machine. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 74/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Project Veritas network unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 74, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Project Veritas network." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "naomi-wolf", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 36, "name": "Naomi Wolf", "suit": "Mirrors", "score": 72, "lane": "liberal-to-alt-media dissent", "route": "controlled-opposition/naomi-wolf.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 72, "networkReach": 73, "updatePriority": 64, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 70, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Naomi Wolf is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward liberal-to-alt-media dissent. The Mirrors suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 72/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Naomi Wolf unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 72, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Naomi Wolf." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bret-weinstein", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 37, "name": "Bret Weinstein", "suit": "Mirrors", "score": 76, "lane": "COVID/lab-leak/intellectual dissent", "route": "controlled-opposition/bret-weinstein.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 76, "networkReach": 77, "updatePriority": 68, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 74, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Bret Weinstein is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward COVID/lab-leak/intellectual dissent. The Mirrors suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 76/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Bret Weinstein unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 76, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Bret Weinstein." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "heather-heying", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 38, "name": "Heather Heying", "suit": "Mirrors", "score": 68, "lane": "science dissent network", "route": "controlled-opposition/heather-heying.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 68, "networkReach": 69, "updatePriority": 60, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 66, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Heather Heying is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward science dissent network. The Mirrors suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 68/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Heather Heying unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 68, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Heather Heying." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "del-bigtree", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 39, "name": "Del Bigtree", "suit": "Mirrors", "score": 74, "lane": "vaccine opposition media", "route": "controlled-opposition/del-bigtree.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 74, "networkReach": 75, "updatePriority": 66, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 72, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Del Bigtree is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward vaccine opposition media. The Mirrors suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 74/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Del Bigtree unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 74, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Del Bigtree." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "robert-malone", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 40, "name": "Robert Malone", "suit": "Mirrors", "score": 79, "lane": "COVID-vaccine opposition", "route": "controlled-opposition/robert-malone.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 79, "networkReach": 80, "updatePriority": 71, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 77, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Robert Malone is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward COVID-vaccine opposition. The Mirrors suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 79/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Robert Malone unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 79, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Robert Malone." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "peter-mccullough", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 41, "name": "Peter McCullough", "suit": "Mirrors", "score": 78, "lane": "COVID-medical dissent", "route": "controlled-opposition/peter-mccullough.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Peter McCullough is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward COVID-medical dissent. The Mirrors suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Peter McCullough unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Peter McCullough." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "sherri-tenpenny", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 42, "name": "Sherri Tenpenny", "suit": "Mirrors", "score": 66, "lane": "vaccine-conspiracy lane", "route": "controlled-opposition/sherri-tenpenny.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 66, "networkReach": 67, "updatePriority": 58, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 64, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Sherri Tenpenny is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward vaccine-conspiracy lane. The Mirrors suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 66/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Sherri Tenpenny unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 66, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Sherri Tenpenny." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "kate-shemirani", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 43, "name": "Kate Shemirani", "suit": "Mirrors", "score": 64, "lane": "anti-vax protest split lane", "route": "controlled-opposition/kate-shemirani.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 64, "networkReach": 65, "updatePriority": 56, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 62, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Kate Shemirani is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward anti-vax protest split lane. The Mirrors suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 64/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Kate Shemirani unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 64, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Kate Shemirani." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "mark-steele", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 44, "name": "Mark Steele", "suit": "Mirrors", "score": 63, "lane": "5G / protest split lane", "route": "controlled-opposition/mark-steele.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 63, "networkReach": 64, "updatePriority": 55, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 61, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Mark Steele is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward 5G / protest split lane. The Mirrors suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 63/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Mark Steele unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 63, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Mark Steele." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "piers-corbyn", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 45, "name": "Piers Corbyn", "suit": "Mirrors", "score": 67, "lane": "climate/COVID protest opposition", "route": "controlled-opposition/piers-corbyn.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 67, "networkReach": 68, "updatePriority": 59, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 65, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Piers Corbyn is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward climate/COVID protest opposition. The Mirrors suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 67/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Piers Corbyn unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 67, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Piers Corbyn." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "max-blumenthal", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 46, "name": "Max Blumenthal", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 73, "lane": "anti-war / geopolitical dissent", "route": "controlled-opposition/max-blumenthal.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 73, "networkReach": 74, "updatePriority": 65, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 71, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Max Blumenthal is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward anti-war / geopolitical dissent. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 73/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Max Blumenthal unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 73, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Max Blumenthal." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "jimmy-dore", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 47, "name": "Jimmy Dore", "suit": "Masks", "score": 72, "lane": "left anti-establishment media", "route": "controlled-opposition/jimmy-dore.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 72, "networkReach": 73, "updatePriority": 64, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 70, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Jimmy Dore is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward left anti-establishment media. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 72/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Jimmy Dore unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 72, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Jimmy Dore." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "glenn-greenwald", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 48, "name": "Glenn Greenwald", "suit": "Masks", "score": 76, "lane": "civil-liberties / anti-security-state media", "route": "controlled-opposition/glenn-greenwald.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 76, "networkReach": 77, "updatePriority": 68, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 74, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Glenn Greenwald is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward civil-liberties / anti-security-state media. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 76/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Glenn Greenwald unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 76, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Glenn Greenwald." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "matt-taibbi", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 49, "name": "Matt Taibbi", "suit": "Masks", "score": 74, "lane": "censorship / establishment-media critic", "route": "controlled-opposition/matt-taibbi.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 74, "networkReach": 75, "updatePriority": 66, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 72, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Matt Taibbi is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward censorship / establishment-media critic. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 74/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Matt Taibbi unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 74, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Matt Taibbi." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "julian-assange", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 50, "name": "Julian Assange", "suit": "Mirrors", "score": 90, "lane": "disclosure / information-war symbol", "route": "controlled-opposition/julian-assange.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 90, "networkReach": 91, "updatePriority": 90, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 88, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Julian Assange is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward disclosure / information-war symbol. The Mirrors suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 90/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Julian Assange unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 90, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Julian Assange." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "edward-snowden", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 51, "name": "Edward Snowden", "suit": "Mirrors", "score": 88, "lane": "surveillance-state opposition symbol", "route": "controlled-opposition/edward-snowden.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 88, "networkReach": 89, "updatePriority": 80, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 86, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Edward Snowden is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward surveillance-state opposition symbol. The Mirrors suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 88/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Edward Snowden unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 88, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Edward Snowden." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "graham-hancock", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 52, "name": "Graham Hancock", "suit": "Mirrors", "score": 70, "lane": "ancient-history opposition / soft disclosure", "route": "controlled-opposition/graham-hancock.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 70, "networkReach": 71, "updatePriority": 62, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 68, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Graham Hancock is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward ancient-history opposition / soft disclosure. The Mirrors suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 70/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Graham Hancock unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 70, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Graham Hancock." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "world-economic-forum", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 1, "name": "World Economic Forum", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 100, "lane": "public-private governance, stakeholder capitalism, digital transformation and global policy coordination", "route": "institution-briefs/world-economic-forum.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 100, "networkReach": 100, "updatePriority": 100, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 98, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "World Economic Forum is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward public-private governance, stakeholder capitalism, digital transformation and global policy coordination. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 100/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for World Economic Forum unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 100, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to World Economic Forum." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "united-nations", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 2, "name": "United Nations", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 99, "lane": "Agenda 2030, SDGs, global governance framework and international coordination", "route": "power-atlas.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 99, "networkReach": 100, "updatePriority": 99, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 97, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "United Nations is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward Agenda 2030, SDGs, global governance framework and international coordination. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 99/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for United Nations unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 99, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to United Nations." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "world-health-organization", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 3, "name": "World Health Organization", "suit": "Serpents", "score": 98, "lane": "global health governance, pandemic policy, health emergency coordination and biosecurity relevance", "route": "institution-briefs/world-health-organization.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 98, "networkReach": 99, "updatePriority": 98, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 96, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "World Health Organization is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward global health governance, pandemic policy, health emergency coordination and biosecurity relevance. The Serpents suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 98/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for World Health Organization unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 98, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to World Health Organization." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bank-for-international-settlements", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 4, "name": "Bank for International Settlements", "suit": "Coins", "score": 97, "lane": "central-bank coordination, monetary architecture and CBDC policy relevance", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 97, "networkReach": 98, "updatePriority": 97, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 95, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Bank for International Settlements is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward central-bank coordination, monetary architecture and CBDC policy relevance. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 97/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Bank for International Settlements unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 97, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Bank for International Settlements." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "blackrock", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 5, "name": "BlackRock", "suit": "Coins", "score": 96, "lane": "asset management, ownership influence, ESG routes and institutional capital power", "route": "big-three/blackrock.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 96, "networkReach": 97, "updatePriority": 96, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 94, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "BlackRock is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward asset management, ownership influence, ESG routes and institutional capital power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 96/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for BlackRock unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 96, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to BlackRock." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "vanguard", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 6, "name": "Vanguard", "suit": "Coins", "score": 95, "lane": "asset management, index ownership and capital concentration route", "route": "big-three/vanguard.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 95, "networkReach": 96, "updatePriority": 95, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 93, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Vanguard is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward asset management, index ownership and capital concentration route. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 95/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Vanguard unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 95, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Vanguard." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "state-street", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 7, "name": "State Street", "suit": "Coins", "score": 94, "lane": "asset management, custody infrastructure and index ownership route", "route": "big-three/state-street.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 94, "networkReach": 95, "updatePriority": 94, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 92, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "State Street is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward asset management, custody infrastructure and index ownership route. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 94/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for State Street unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 94, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to State Street." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "international-monetary-fund", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 8, "name": "International Monetary Fund", "suit": "Coins", "score": 94, "lane": "global finance, debt systems, policy conditionality and monetary governance", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 94, "networkReach": 95, "updatePriority": 94, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 92, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "International Monetary Fund is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward global finance, debt systems, policy conditionality and monetary governance. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 94/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for International Monetary Fund unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 94, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to International Monetary Fund." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "world-bank", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 9, "name": "World Bank", "suit": "Coins", "score": 93, "lane": "development finance, digital public infrastructure and global policy funding routes", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 93, "networkReach": 94, "updatePriority": 93, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 91, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "World Bank is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward development finance, digital public infrastructure and global policy funding routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 93/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for World Bank unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 93, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to World Bank." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "federal-reserve-system", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 10, "name": "Federal Reserve System", "suit": "Coins", "score": 93, "lane": "central banking, monetary policy, payment rails and financial-system influence", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 93, "networkReach": 94, "updatePriority": 93, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 91, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Federal Reserve System is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward central banking, monetary policy, payment rails and financial-system influence. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 93/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Federal Reserve System unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 93, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Federal Reserve System." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "european-central-bank", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 11, "name": "European Central Bank", "suit": "Coins", "score": 91, "lane": "eurozone central banking, digital euro and monetary governance route", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 91, "networkReach": 92, "updatePriority": 91, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 89, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "European Central Bank is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward eurozone central banking, digital euro and monetary governance route. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 91/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for European Central Bank unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 91, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to European Central Bank." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "european-commission", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 12, "name": "European Commission", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 91, "lane": "EU regulation, digital identity policy, platform rules and Agenda-linked governance", "route": "power-structure-map.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 91, "networkReach": 92, "updatePriority": 91, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 89, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "European Commission is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward EU regulation, digital identity policy, platform rules and Agenda-linked governance. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 91/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for European Commission unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 91, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to European Commission." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "world-trade-organization", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 13, "name": "World Trade Organization", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 88, "lane": "trade governance, global standards and economic-policy coordination", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 88, "networkReach": 89, "updatePriority": 80, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 86, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "World Trade Organization is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward trade governance, global standards and economic-policy coordination. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 88/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for World Trade Organization unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 88, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to World Trade Organization." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "organisation-for-economic-co-operation-and-development", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 14, "name": "Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 88, "lane": "policy standards, taxation, governance metrics and digital-government influence", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 88, "networkReach": 89, "updatePriority": 80, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 86, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward policy standards, taxation, governance metrics and digital-government influence. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 88/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 88, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "g20", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 15, "name": "G20", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 87, "lane": "global policy coordination across finance, health, climate, digital economy and security", "route": "power-structure-map.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 87, "networkReach": 88, "updatePriority": 79, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 85, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "G20 is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward global policy coordination across finance, health, climate, digital economy and security. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 87/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for G20 unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 87, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to G20." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "g7", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 16, "name": "G7", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 86, "lane": "advanced-economy policy coordination, sanctions, AI, climate and security alignment", "route": "power-structure-map.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 86, "networkReach": 87, "updatePriority": 78, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 84, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "G7 is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward advanced-economy policy coordination, sanctions, AI, climate and security alignment. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 86/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for G7 unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 86, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to G7." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "microsoft", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 17, "name": "Microsoft", "suit": "Keys", "score": 90, "lane": "cloud, AI, identity infrastructure, government contracts and digital operating systems", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 90, "networkReach": 91, "updatePriority": 90, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 88, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Microsoft is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward cloud, AI, identity infrastructure, government contracts and digital operating systems. The Keys suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 90/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Microsoft unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 90, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Microsoft." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "google", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 18, "name": "Google", "suit": "Keys", "score": 90, "lane": "search, AI, data infrastructure, Android, ads and information access", "route": "answer-engine.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 90, "networkReach": 91, "updatePriority": 90, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 88, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Google is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward search, AI, data infrastructure, Android, ads and information access. The Keys suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 90/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Google unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 90, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Google." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "apple", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 19, "name": "Apple", "suit": "Keys", "score": 86, "lane": "device identity, biometric hardware, platform control and privacy infrastructure", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 86, "networkReach": 87, "updatePriority": 78, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 84, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Apple is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward device identity, biometric hardware, platform control and privacy infrastructure. The Keys suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 86/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Apple unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 86, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Apple." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "meta-platforms", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 20, "name": "Meta Platforms", "suit": "Masks", "score": 86, "lane": "social graph, identity systems, narrative flow, VR and platform moderation", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 86, "networkReach": 87, "updatePriority": 78, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 84, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Meta Platforms is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward social graph, identity systems, narrative flow, VR and platform moderation. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 86/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Meta Platforms unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 86, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Meta Platforms." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "amazon", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 21, "name": "Amazon", "suit": "Keys", "score": 85, "lane": "cloud infrastructure, logistics, surveillance-adjacent systems and platform power", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 85, "networkReach": 86, "updatePriority": 77, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 83, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Amazon is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward cloud infrastructure, logistics, surveillance-adjacent systems and platform power. The Keys suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 85/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Amazon unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 85, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Amazon." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "oracle", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 22, "name": "Oracle", "suit": "Keys", "score": 84, "lane": "databases, cloud, enterprise identity, health records and government systems", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Oracle is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward databases, cloud, enterprise identity, health records and government systems. The Keys suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Oracle unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Oracle." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "palantir-technologies", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 23, "name": "Palantir Technologies", "suit": "Swords", "score": 89, "lane": "data fusion, intelligence analytics, defense, health and government systems", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 89, "networkReach": 90, "updatePriority": 89, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 87, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Palantir Technologies is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward data fusion, intelligence analytics, defense, health and government systems. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 89/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Palantir Technologies unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 89, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Palantir Technologies." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "openai", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 24, "name": "OpenAI", "suit": "Keys", "score": 84, "lane": "AI governance, model infrastructure, information mediation and policy influence", "route": "answer-engine.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "OpenAI is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward AI governance, model infrastructure, information mediation and policy influence. The Keys suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for OpenAI unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to OpenAI." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "central-intelligence-agency", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 25, "name": "Central Intelligence Agency", "suit": "Swords", "score": 90, "lane": "intelligence history, covert action, information operations and security-state route", "route": "evidence-vault.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 90, "networkReach": 91, "updatePriority": 90, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 88, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Central Intelligence Agency is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward intelligence history, covert action, information operations and security-state route. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 90/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Central Intelligence Agency unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 90, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Central Intelligence Agency." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "national-security-agency", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 26, "name": "National Security Agency", "suit": "Swords", "score": 89, "lane": "signals intelligence, surveillance architecture and cyber capability route", "route": "evidence-vault.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 89, "networkReach": 90, "updatePriority": 89, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 87, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "National Security Agency is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward signals intelligence, surveillance architecture and cyber capability route. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 89/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for National Security Agency unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 89, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to National Security Agency." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "federal-bureau-of-investigation", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 27, "name": "Federal Bureau of Investigation", "suit": "Swords", "score": 84, "lane": "domestic security, investigations, platform liaison and legal-security interface", "route": "evidence-vault.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Federal Bureau of Investigation is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward domestic security, investigations, platform liaison and legal-security interface. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Federal Bureau of Investigation unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Federal Bureau of Investigation." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "gchq", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 28, "name": "GCHQ", "suit": "Swords", "score": 84, "lane": "signals intelligence, cyber security and Five Eyes infrastructure", "route": "evidence-vault.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "GCHQ is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward signals intelligence, cyber security and Five Eyes infrastructure. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for GCHQ unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to GCHQ." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "mi6", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 29, "name": "MI6", "suit": "Swords", "score": 82, "lane": "foreign intelligence, diplomacy-security crossover and historical operations route", "route": "evidence-vault.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "MI6 is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward foreign intelligence, diplomacy-security crossover and historical operations route. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for MI6 unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to MI6." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "nato", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 30, "name": "NATO", "suit": "Swords", "score": 88, "lane": "security alliance, defense coordination, strategic communications and military policy", "route": "power-structure-map.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 88, "networkReach": 89, "updatePriority": 80, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 86, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "NATO is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward security alliance, defense coordination, strategic communications and military policy. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 88/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for NATO unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 88, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to NATO." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "council-on-foreign-relations", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 31, "name": "Council on Foreign Relations", "suit": "Masks", "score": 84, "lane": "foreign-policy elite network, publications, convening power and policy formation", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Council on Foreign Relations is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward foreign-policy elite network, publications, convening power and policy formation. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Council on Foreign Relations unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Council on Foreign Relations." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "trilateral-commission", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 32, "name": "Trilateral Commission", "suit": "Masks", "score": 82, "lane": "transnational policy network and elite governance coordination route", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Trilateral Commission is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward transnational policy network and elite governance coordination route. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Trilateral Commission unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Trilateral Commission." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bilderberg-group", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 33, "name": "Bilderberg Group", "suit": "Masks", "score": 82, "lane": "elite conference network, informal policy dialogue and transparency questions", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Bilderberg Group is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward elite conference network, informal policy dialogue and transparency questions. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Bilderberg Group unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Bilderberg Group." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "chatham-house", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 34, "name": "Chatham House", "suit": "Masks", "score": 81, "lane": "foreign-policy institute, elite convening and international-affairs narrative route", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 81, "networkReach": 82, "updatePriority": 73, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 79, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Chatham House is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward foreign-policy institute, elite convening and international-affairs narrative route. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 81/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Chatham House unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 81, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Chatham House." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "atlantic-council", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 35, "name": "Atlantic Council", "suit": "Masks", "score": 80, "lane": "security-policy think tank, NATO alignment and geopolitical narrative route", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Atlantic Council is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward security-policy think tank, NATO alignment and geopolitical narrative route. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Atlantic Council unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Atlantic Council." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "brookings-institution", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 36, "name": "Brookings Institution", "suit": "Masks", "score": 78, "lane": "policy research, governance influence and establishment-policy pipeline", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Brookings Institution is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward policy research, governance influence and establishment-policy pipeline. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Brookings Institution unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Brookings Institution." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "gavi-the-vaccine-alliance", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 37, "name": "Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance", "suit": "Serpents", "score": 86, "lane": "vaccine finance, global health systems and public-private health governance", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 86, "networkReach": 87, "updatePriority": 78, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 84, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward vaccine finance, global health systems and public-private health governance. The Serpents suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 86/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 86, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "coalition-for-epidemic-preparedness-innovations", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 38, "name": "Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations", "suit": "Serpents", "score": 84, "lane": "pandemic preparedness, vaccine platforms and biosecurity relevance", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward pandemic preparedness, vaccine platforms and biosecurity relevance. The Serpents suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "food-and-agriculture-organization", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 39, "name": "Food and Agriculture Organization", "suit": "Serpents", "score": 80, "lane": "food systems, agricultural policy, sustainability and population-resource governance", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Food and Agriculture Organization is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward food systems, agricultural policy, sustainability and population-resource governance. The Serpents suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Food and Agriculture Organization unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Food and Agriculture Organization." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "codex-alimentarius-commission", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 40, "name": "Codex Alimentarius Commission", "suit": "Serpents", "score": 78, "lane": "food standards, global regulation and health/food governance route", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Codex Alimentarius Commission is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward food standards, global regulation and health/food governance route. The Serpents suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Codex Alimentarius Commission unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Codex Alimentarius Commission." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "reuters", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 41, "name": "Reuters", "suit": "Masks", "score": 78, "lane": "global newswire, institutional information distribution and narrative baseline setting", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Reuters is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward global newswire, institutional information distribution and narrative baseline setting. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Reuters unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Reuters." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "associated-press", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 42, "name": "Associated Press", "suit": "Masks", "score": 77, "lane": "global newswire, shared media facts and narrative infrastructure", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 77, "networkReach": 78, "updatePriority": 69, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 75, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Associated Press is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward global newswire, shared media facts and narrative infrastructure. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 77/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Associated Press unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 77, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Associated Press." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bbc", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 43, "name": "BBC", "suit": "Masks", "score": 76, "lane": "public broadcaster, global soft power, narrative formation and trust architecture", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 76, "networkReach": 77, "updatePriority": 68, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 74, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "BBC is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward public broadcaster, global soft power, narrative formation and trust architecture. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 76/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for BBC unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 76, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to BBC." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "the-new-york-times", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 44, "name": "The New York Times", "suit": "Masks", "score": 76, "lane": "elite media agenda-setting, institutional legitimacy and narrative power", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 76, "networkReach": 77, "updatePriority": 68, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 74, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "The New York Times is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward elite media agenda-setting, institutional legitimacy and narrative power. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 76/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for The New York Times unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 76, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to The New York Times." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bill-melinda-gates-foundation", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 45, "name": "Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation", "suit": "Serpents", "score": 90, "lane": "global health, vaccine systems, agriculture, digital public goods and philanthropy influence", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 90, "networkReach": 91, "updatePriority": 90, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 88, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward global health, vaccine systems, agriculture, digital public goods and philanthropy influence. The Serpents suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 90/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 90, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "open-society-foundations", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 46, "name": "Open Society Foundations", "suit": "Masks", "score": 82, "lane": "NGO networks, civil society funding, policy influence and political controversy route", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Open Society Foundations is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward NGO networks, civil society funding, policy influence and political controversy route. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Open Society Foundations unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Open Society Foundations." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "rockefeller-foundation", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 47, "name": "Rockefeller Foundation", "suit": "Serpents", "score": 84, "lane": "public health history, development policy, philanthropy and global systems influence", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Rockefeller Foundation is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward public health history, development policy, philanthropy and global systems influence. The Serpents suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Rockefeller Foundation unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Rockefeller Foundation." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "wellcome-trust", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 48, "name": "Wellcome Trust", "suit": "Serpents", "score": 82, "lane": "biomedical research, health funding, pandemic science and institutional influence", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Wellcome Trust is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward biomedical research, health funding, pandemic science and institutional influence. The Serpents suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Wellcome Trust unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Wellcome Trust." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "international-organization-for-standardization", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 49, "name": "International Organization for Standardization", "suit": "Keys", "score": 80, "lane": "standards infrastructure, technical governance and institutional interoperability", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "International Organization for Standardization is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward standards infrastructure, technical governance and institutional interoperability. The Keys suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for International Organization for Standardization unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to International Organization for Standardization." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "icann", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 50, "name": "ICANN", "suit": "Keys", "score": 79, "lane": "internet governance, domain infrastructure and global technical coordination", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 79, "networkReach": 80, "updatePriority": 71, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 77, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "ICANN is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward internet governance, domain infrastructure and global technical coordination. The Keys suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 79/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for ICANN unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 79, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to ICANN." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "swift", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 51, "name": "SWIFT", "suit": "Coins", "score": 87, "lane": "financial messaging, sanctions infrastructure and global payment rails", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 87, "networkReach": 88, "updatePriority": 79, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 85, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "SWIFT is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward financial messaging, sanctions infrastructure and global payment rails. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 87/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for SWIFT unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 87, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to SWIFT." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "world-wide-web-consortium", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 52, "name": "World Wide Web Consortium", "suit": "Keys", "score": 76, "lane": "web standards, digital architecture and technical governance route", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 76, "networkReach": 77, "updatePriority": 68, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 74, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "World Wide Web Consortium is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward web standards, digital architecture and technical governance route. The Keys suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 76/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for World Wide Web Consortium unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 76, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to World Wide Web Consortium." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "rothschild-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 1, "name": "Rothschild family", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 94, "lane": "banking, philanthropy, finance history and public family offices", "route": "power-families/rothschild-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 94, "networkReach": 95, "updatePriority": 94, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 92, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Rothschild family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward banking, philanthropy, finance history and public family offices. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 94/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Rothschild family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 94, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Rothschild family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "rockefeller-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 2, "name": "Rockefeller family", "suit": "Coins", "score": 93, "lane": "oil, banking history, philanthropy, universities and foundations", "route": "power-families/rockefeller-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 93, "networkReach": 94, "updatePriority": 93, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 91, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Rockefeller family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward oil, banking history, philanthropy, universities and foundations. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 93/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Rockefeller family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 93, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Rockefeller family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "house-of-saud", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 3, "name": "House of Saud", "suit": "Swords", "score": 92, "lane": "state monarchy, energy, sovereign wealth and diplomacy", "route": "power-families/house-of-saud.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 92, "networkReach": 93, "updatePriority": 92, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 90, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "House of Saud is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward state monarchy, energy, sovereign wealth and diplomacy. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 92/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for House of Saud unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 92, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to House of Saud." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "al-nahyan-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 4, "name": "Al Nahyan family", "suit": "Masks", "score": 91, "lane": "UAE state power, sovereign wealth, energy and investment", "route": "power-families/al-nahyan-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 91, "networkReach": 92, "updatePriority": 91, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 89, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Al Nahyan family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward UAE state power, sovereign wealth, energy and investment. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 91/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Al Nahyan family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 91, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Al Nahyan family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "al-thani-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 5, "name": "Al Thani family", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 90, "lane": "Qatar state power, media, energy and sovereign wealth", "route": "power-families/al-thani-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 90, "networkReach": 91, "updatePriority": 90, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 88, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Al Thani family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward Qatar state power, media, energy and sovereign wealth. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 90/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Al Thani family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 90, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Al Thani family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "al-maktoum-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 6, "name": "Al Maktoum family", "suit": "Coins", "score": 89, "lane": "Dubai state-business infrastructure, ports, finance and aviation", "route": "power-families/al-maktoum-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 89, "networkReach": 90, "updatePriority": 89, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 87, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Al Maktoum family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward Dubai state-business infrastructure, ports, finance and aviation. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 89/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Al Maktoum family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 89, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Al Maktoum family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "windsor-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 7, "name": "Windsor family", "suit": "Swords", "score": 88, "lane": "constitutional monarchy, land, diplomacy and symbolic soft power", "route": "power-families/windsor-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 88, "networkReach": 89, "updatePriority": 80, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 86, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Windsor family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward constitutional monarchy, land, diplomacy and symbolic soft power. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 88/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Windsor family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 88, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Windsor family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "walton-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 8, "name": "Walton family", "suit": "Masks", "score": 87, "lane": "retail, philanthropy, political donations and supply-chain scale", "route": "power-families/walton-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 87, "networkReach": 88, "updatePriority": 79, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 85, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Walton family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward retail, philanthropy, political donations and supply-chain scale. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 87/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Walton family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 87, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Walton family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "mars-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 9, "name": "Mars family", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 86, "lane": "global food, private enterprise and philanthropy", "route": "power-families/mars-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 86, "networkReach": 87, "updatePriority": 78, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 84, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Mars family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward global food, private enterprise and philanthropy. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 86/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Mars family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 86, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Mars family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "koch-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 10, "name": "Koch family", "suit": "Coins", "score": 85, "lane": "energy, political philanthropy, universities and policy networks", "route": "power-families/koch-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 85, "networkReach": 86, "updatePriority": 77, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 83, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Koch family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward energy, political philanthropy, universities and policy networks. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 85/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Koch family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 85, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Koch family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "ambani-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 11, "name": "Ambani family", "suit": "Swords", "score": 84, "lane": "telecom, energy, retail, media and Indian industrial policy", "route": "power-families/ambani-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Ambani family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward telecom, energy, retail, media and Indian industrial policy. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Ambani family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Ambani family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "adani-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 12, "name": "Adani family", "suit": "Masks", "score": 83, "lane": "ports, energy, infrastructure and national development routes", "route": "power-families/adani-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 83, "networkReach": 84, "updatePriority": 75, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 81, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Adani family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward ports, energy, infrastructure and national development routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 83/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Adani family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 83, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Adani family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "arnault-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 13, "name": "Arnault family", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 82, "lane": "luxury, media, culture and European capital", "route": "power-families/arnault-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Arnault family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward luxury, media, culture and European capital. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Arnault family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Arnault family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bettencourt-meyers-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 14, "name": "Bettencourt Meyers family", "suit": "Coins", "score": 91, "lane": "beauty, inheritance, philanthropy and European capital", "route": "power-families/bettencourt-meyers-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 91, "networkReach": 92, "updatePriority": 91, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 89, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Bettencourt Meyers family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward beauty, inheritance, philanthropy and European capital. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 91/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Bettencourt Meyers family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 91, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Bettencourt Meyers family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "quandt-klatten-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 15, "name": "Quandt-Klatten family", "suit": "Swords", "score": 90, "lane": "automotive, chemicals, industrial ownership and Germany routes", "route": "power-families/quandt-klatten-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 90, "networkReach": 91, "updatePriority": 90, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 88, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Quandt-Klatten family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward automotive, chemicals, industrial ownership and Germany routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 90/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Quandt-Klatten family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 90, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Quandt-Klatten family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "porsche-pi-ch-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 16, "name": "Porsche-Piëch family", "suit": "Masks", "score": 89, "lane": "automotive ownership, foundations and industrial strategy", "route": "power-families/porsche-pi-ch-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 89, "networkReach": 90, "updatePriority": 89, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 87, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Porsche-Piëch family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward automotive ownership, foundations and industrial strategy. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 89/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Porsche-Piëch family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 89, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Porsche-Piëch family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "agnelli-elkann-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 17, "name": "Agnelli-Elkann family", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 88, "lane": "automotive, media, finance and European board networks", "route": "power-families/agnelli-elkann-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 88, "networkReach": 89, "updatePriority": 80, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 86, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Agnelli-Elkann family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward automotive, media, finance and European board networks. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 88/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Agnelli-Elkann family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 88, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Agnelli-Elkann family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "lee-samsung-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 18, "name": "Lee Samsung family", "suit": "Coins", "score": 87, "lane": "technology, semiconductors, finance and South Korean chaebol power", "route": "power-families/lee-samsung-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 87, "networkReach": 88, "updatePriority": 79, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 85, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Lee Samsung family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward technology, semiconductors, finance and South Korean chaebol power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 87/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Lee Samsung family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 87, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Lee Samsung family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "pritzker-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 19, "name": "Pritzker family", "suit": "Swords", "score": 86, "lane": "hotels, politics, philanthropy and civic institutions", "route": "power-families/pritzker-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 86, "networkReach": 87, "updatePriority": 78, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 84, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Pritzker family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward hotels, politics, philanthropy and civic institutions. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 86/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Pritzker family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 86, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Pritzker family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "cargill-macmillan-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 20, "name": "Cargill-MacMillan family", "suit": "Masks", "score": 85, "lane": "food commodities, agriculture and private-company scale", "route": "power-families/cargill-macmillan-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 85, "networkReach": 86, "updatePriority": 77, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 83, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Cargill-MacMillan family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward food commodities, agriculture and private-company scale. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 85/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Cargill-MacMillan family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 85, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Cargill-MacMillan family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "duncan-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 21, "name": "Duncan family", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 84, "lane": "energy infrastructure and pipeline wealth", "route": "power-families/duncan-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Duncan family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward energy infrastructure and pipeline wealth. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Duncan family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Duncan family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "lauder-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 22, "name": "Lauder family", "suit": "Coins", "score": 83, "lane": "beauty, diplomacy, art, media and philanthropy", "route": "power-families/lauder-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 83, "networkReach": 84, "updatePriority": 75, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 81, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Lauder family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward beauty, diplomacy, art, media and philanthropy. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 83/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Lauder family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 83, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Lauder family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "cox-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 23, "name": "Cox family", "suit": "Swords", "score": 82, "lane": "media, telecom, automotive services and philanthropy", "route": "power-families/cox-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Cox family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward media, telecom, automotive services and philanthropy. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Cox family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Cox family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "johnson-sc-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 24, "name": "Johnson SC family", "suit": "Masks", "score": 81, "lane": "consumer products, family enterprise and philanthropy", "route": "power-families/johnson-sc-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 81, "networkReach": 82, "updatePriority": 73, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 79, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Johnson SC family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward consumer products, family enterprise and philanthropy. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 81/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Johnson SC family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 81, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Johnson SC family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "mellon-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 25, "name": "Mellon family", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 80, "lane": "banking history, foundations, universities and art institutions", "route": "power-families/mellon-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Mellon family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward banking history, foundations, universities and art institutions. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Mellon family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Mellon family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "oppenheimer-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 26, "name": "Oppenheimer family", "suit": "Coins", "score": 79, "lane": "diamonds, conservation, investment and Africa routes", "route": "power-families/oppenheimer-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 79, "networkReach": 80, "updatePriority": 71, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 77, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Oppenheimer family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward diamonds, conservation, investment and Africa routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 79/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Oppenheimer family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 79, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Oppenheimer family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "rupert-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 27, "name": "Rupert family", "suit": "Swords", "score": 88, "lane": "luxury, banking, South African capital and philanthropy", "route": "power-families/rupert-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 88, "networkReach": 89, "updatePriority": 80, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 86, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Rupert family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward luxury, banking, South African capital and philanthropy. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 88/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Rupert family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 88, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Rupert family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "pinault-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 28, "name": "Pinault family", "suit": "Masks", "score": 87, "lane": "luxury, art, media and European finance", "route": "power-families/pinault-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 87, "networkReach": 88, "updatePriority": 79, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 85, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Pinault family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward luxury, art, media and European finance. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 87/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Pinault family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 87, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Pinault family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "dassault-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 29, "name": "Dassault family", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 86, "lane": "aerospace, media, defence industry and French capital", "route": "power-families/dassault-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 86, "networkReach": 87, "updatePriority": 78, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 84, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Dassault family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward aerospace, media, defence industry and French capital. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 86/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Dassault family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 86, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Dassault family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "dumas-herm-s-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 30, "name": "Dumas-Hermès family", "suit": "Coins", "score": 85, "lane": "luxury, heritage brand control and French capital", "route": "power-families/dumas-herm-s-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 85, "networkReach": 86, "updatePriority": 77, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 83, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Dumas-Hermès family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward luxury, heritage brand control and French capital. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 85/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Dumas-Hermès family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 85, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Dumas-Hermès family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "m-ller-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 31, "name": "Møller family", "suit": "Swords", "score": 84, "lane": "shipping, logistics, ports and foundation ownership", "route": "power-families/m-ller-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Møller family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward shipping, logistics, ports and foundation ownership. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Møller family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Møller family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "rausing-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 32, "name": "Rausing family", "suit": "Masks", "score": 83, "lane": "packaging, food systems and philanthropy", "route": "power-families/rausing-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 83, "networkReach": 84, "updatePriority": 75, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 81, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Rausing family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward packaging, food systems and philanthropy. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 83/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Rausing family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 83, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Rausing family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "ferrero-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 33, "name": "Ferrero family", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 82, "lane": "food brands, private enterprise and global distribution", "route": "power-families/ferrero-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Ferrero family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward food brands, private enterprise and global distribution. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Ferrero family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Ferrero family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "del-vecchio-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 34, "name": "Del Vecchio family", "suit": "Coins", "score": 81, "lane": "eyewear, finance and European corporate ownership", "route": "power-families/del-vecchio-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 81, "networkReach": 82, "updatePriority": 73, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 79, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Del Vecchio family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward eyewear, finance and European corporate ownership. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 81/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Del Vecchio family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 81, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Del Vecchio family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "benetton-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 35, "name": "Benetton family", "suit": "Swords", "score": 80, "lane": "retail, infrastructure and Italian capital", "route": "power-families/benetton-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Benetton family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward retail, infrastructure and Italian capital. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Benetton family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Benetton family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "newhouse-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 36, "name": "Newhouse family", "suit": "Masks", "score": 79, "lane": "media, publishing, cable and information lanes", "route": "power-families/newhouse-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 79, "networkReach": 80, "updatePriority": 71, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 77, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Newhouse family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward media, publishing, cable and information lanes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 79/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Newhouse family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 79, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Newhouse family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "hearst-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 37, "name": "Hearst family", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 78, "lane": "media, magazines, local news and philanthropy", "route": "power-families/hearst-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Hearst family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward media, magazines, local news and philanthropy. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Hearst family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Hearst family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "sulzberger-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 38, "name": "Sulzberger family", "suit": "Coins", "score": 77, "lane": "newspaper governance, media trust and family-control structure", "route": "power-families/sulzberger-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 77, "networkReach": 78, "updatePriority": 69, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 75, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Sulzberger family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward newspaper governance, media trust and family-control structure. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 77/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Sulzberger family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 77, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Sulzberger family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "redstone-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 39, "name": "Redstone family", "suit": "Swords", "score": 76, "lane": "media ownership, entertainment and information channels", "route": "power-families/redstone-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 76, "networkReach": 77, "updatePriority": 68, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 74, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Redstone family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward media ownership, entertainment and information channels. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 76/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Redstone family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 76, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Redstone family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "mohn-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 40, "name": "Mohn family", "suit": "Masks", "score": 85, "lane": "media, publishing, foundation policy and European influence", "route": "power-families/mohn-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 85, "networkReach": 86, "updatePriority": 77, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 83, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Mohn family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward media, publishing, foundation policy and European influence. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 85/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Mohn family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 85, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Mohn family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "albrecht-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 41, "name": "Albrecht family", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 84, "lane": "discount retail, food pricing and European supply chains", "route": "power-families/albrecht-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Albrecht family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward discount retail, food pricing and European supply chains. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Albrecht family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Albrecht family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "schwarz-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 42, "name": "Schwarz family", "suit": "Coins", "score": 83, "lane": "retail, food distribution, education and philanthropy", "route": "power-families/schwarz-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 83, "networkReach": 84, "updatePriority": 75, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 81, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Schwarz family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward retail, food distribution, education and philanthropy. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 83/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Schwarz family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 83, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Schwarz family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "tata-family-and-trusts", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 43, "name": "Tata family and trusts", "suit": "Swords", "score": 82, "lane": "Indian industry, philanthropy, technology and education", "route": "power-families/tata-family-and-trusts.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Tata family and trusts is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward Indian industry, philanthropy, technology and education. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Tata family and trusts unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Tata family and trusts." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "birla-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 44, "name": "Birla family", "suit": "Masks", "score": 81, "lane": "Indian industrial conglomerate and philanthropy", "route": "power-families/birla-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 81, "networkReach": 82, "updatePriority": 73, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 79, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Birla family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward Indian industrial conglomerate and philanthropy. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 81/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Birla family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 81, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Birla family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "soros-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 45, "name": "Soros family", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 80, "lane": "philanthropy, civil society, policy grants and public debate", "route": "power-families/soros-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Soros family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward philanthropy, civil society, policy grants and public debate. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Soros family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Soros family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bloomberg-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 46, "name": "Bloomberg family", "suit": "Coins", "score": 79, "lane": "media data, finance terminals, cities and philanthropy", "route": "power-families/bloomberg-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 79, "networkReach": 80, "updatePriority": 71, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 77, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Bloomberg family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward media data, finance terminals, cities and philanthropy. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 79/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Bloomberg family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 79, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Bloomberg family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "musk-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 47, "name": "Musk family", "suit": "Swords", "score": 78, "lane": "technology, space, social media, energy and public policy debate", "route": "power-families/musk-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Musk family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward technology, space, social media, energy and public policy debate. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Musk family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Musk family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "gates-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 48, "name": "Gates family", "suit": "Masks", "score": 77, "lane": "technology wealth, philanthropy, health and education", "route": "power-families/gates-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 77, "networkReach": 78, "updatePriority": 69, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 75, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Gates family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward technology wealth, philanthropy, health and education. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 77/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Gates family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 77, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Gates family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bezos-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 49, "name": "Bezos family", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 76, "lane": "commerce, cloud infrastructure, media and space", "route": "power-families/bezos-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 76, "networkReach": 77, "updatePriority": 68, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 74, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Bezos family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward commerce, cloud infrastructure, media and space. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 76/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Bezos family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 76, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Bezos family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "zuckerberg-chan-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 50, "name": "Zuckerberg-Chan family", "suit": "Coins", "score": 75, "lane": "social platforms, philanthropy, education and biomedical research", "route": "power-families/zuckerberg-chan-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 75, "networkReach": 76, "updatePriority": 67, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 73, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Zuckerberg-Chan family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward social platforms, philanthropy, education and biomedical research. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 75/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Zuckerberg-Chan family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 75, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Zuckerberg-Chan family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "page-brin-families", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 51, "name": "Page-Brin families", "suit": "Swords", "score": 74, "lane": "search, AI, data infrastructure and technology capital", "route": "power-families/page-brin-families.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 74, "networkReach": 75, "updatePriority": 66, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 72, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Page-Brin families is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward search, AI, data infrastructure and technology capital. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 74/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Page-Brin families unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 74, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Page-Brin families." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "ellison-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 52, "name": "Ellison family", "suit": "Masks", "score": 73, "lane": "cloud, databases, health data and enterprise software", "route": "power-families/ellison-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 73, "networkReach": 74, "updatePriority": 65, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 71, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Ellison family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward cloud, databases, health data and enterprise software. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 73/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Ellison family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 73, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Ellison family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "freemasonry", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 1, "name": "Freemasonry", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 90, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/freemasonry.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 90, "networkReach": 91, "updatePriority": 90, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 88, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Freemasonry is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 90/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Freemasonry unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 90, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Freemasonry." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "scottish-rite-freemasonry", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 2, "name": "Scottish Rite Freemasonry", "suit": "Coins", "score": 89, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/scottish-rite-freemasonry.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 89, "networkReach": 90, "updatePriority": 89, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 87, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Scottish Rite Freemasonry is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 89/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Scottish Rite Freemasonry unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 89, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Scottish Rite Freemasonry." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "york-rite-freemasonry", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 3, "name": "York Rite Freemasonry", "suit": "Swords", "score": 88, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/york-rite-freemasonry.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 88, "networkReach": 89, "updatePriority": 80, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 86, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "York Rite Freemasonry is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 88/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for York Rite Freemasonry unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 88, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to York Rite Freemasonry." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "shriners-international", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 4, "name": "Shriners International", "suit": "Masks", "score": 87, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/shriners-international.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 87, "networkReach": 88, "updatePriority": 79, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 85, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Shriners International is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 87/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Shriners International unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 87, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Shriners International." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "order-of-the-eastern-star", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 5, "name": "Order of the Eastern Star", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 86, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/order-of-the-eastern-star.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 86, "networkReach": 87, "updatePriority": 78, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 84, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Order of the Eastern Star is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 86/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Order of the Eastern Star unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 86, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Order of the Eastern Star." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "sovereign-military-order-of-malta", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 6, "name": "Sovereign Military Order of Malta", "suit": "Coins", "score": 85, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/sovereign-military-order-of-malta.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 85, "networkReach": 86, "updatePriority": 77, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 83, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Sovereign Military Order of Malta is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 85/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Sovereign Military Order of Malta unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 85, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Sovereign Military Order of Malta." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "knights-of-columbus", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 7, "name": "Knights of Columbus", "suit": "Swords", "score": 84, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/knights-of-columbus.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Knights of Columbus is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Knights of Columbus unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Knights of Columbus." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "odd-fellows", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 8, "name": "Odd Fellows", "suit": "Masks", "score": 83, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/odd-fellows.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 83, "networkReach": 84, "updatePriority": 75, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 81, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Odd Fellows is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 83/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Odd Fellows unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 83, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Odd Fellows." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "elks", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 9, "name": "Elks", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 82, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/elks.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Elks is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Elks unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Elks." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "moose-international", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 10, "name": "Moose International", "suit": "Coins", "score": 81, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/moose-international.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 81, "networkReach": 82, "updatePriority": 73, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 79, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Moose International is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 81/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Moose International unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 81, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Moose International." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "orange-order", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 11, "name": "Orange Order", "suit": "Swords", "score": 80, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/orange-order.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Orange Order is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Orange Order unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Orange Order." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "ancient-order-of-hibernians", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 12, "name": "Ancient Order of Hibernians", "suit": "Masks", "score": 79, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/ancient-order-of-hibernians.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 79, "networkReach": 80, "updatePriority": 71, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 77, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Ancient Order of Hibernians is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 79/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Ancient Order of Hibernians unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 79, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Ancient Order of Hibernians." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "rosicrucian-amorc", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 13, "name": "Rosicrucian AMORC", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 78, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/rosicrucian-amorc.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Rosicrucian AMORC is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Rosicrucian AMORC unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Rosicrucian AMORC." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "societas-rosicruciana-in-anglia", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 14, "name": "Societas Rosicruciana in Anglia", "suit": "Coins", "score": 87, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/societas-rosicruciana-in-anglia.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 87, "networkReach": 88, "updatePriority": 79, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 85, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Societas Rosicruciana in Anglia is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 87/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Societas Rosicruciana in Anglia unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 87, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Societas Rosicruciana in Anglia." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "hermetic-order-of-the-golden-dawn", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 15, "name": "Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn", "suit": "Swords", "score": 86, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/hermetic-order-of-the-golden-dawn.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 86, "networkReach": 87, "updatePriority": 78, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 84, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 86/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 86, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "ordo-templi-orientis", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 16, "name": "Ordo Templi Orientis", "suit": "Masks", "score": 85, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/ordo-templi-orientis.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 85, "networkReach": 86, "updatePriority": 77, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 83, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Ordo Templi Orientis is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 85/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Ordo Templi Orientis unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 85, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Ordo Templi Orientis." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "a-a-thelemic-order", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 17, "name": "A∴A∴ Thelemic order", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 84, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/a-a-thelemic-order.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "A∴A∴ Thelemic order is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for A∴A∴ Thelemic order unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to A∴A∴ Thelemic order." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "martinist-order", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 18, "name": "Martinist Order", "suit": "Coins", "score": 83, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/martinist-order.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 83, "networkReach": 84, "updatePriority": 75, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 81, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Martinist Order is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 83/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Martinist Order unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 83, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Martinist Order." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "memphis-misraim-rite", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 19, "name": "Memphis-Misraim Rite", "suit": "Swords", "score": 82, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/memphis-misraim-rite.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Memphis-Misraim Rite is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Memphis-Misraim Rite unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Memphis-Misraim Rite." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bavarian-illuminati-historical-file", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 20, "name": "Bavarian Illuminati historical file", "suit": "Masks", "score": 81, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/bavarian-illuminati-historical-file.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 81, "networkReach": 82, "updatePriority": 73, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 79, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Bavarian Illuminati historical file is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 81/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Bavarian Illuminati historical file unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 81, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Bavarian Illuminati historical file." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "carbonari-historical-network", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 21, "name": "Carbonari historical network", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 80, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/carbonari-historical-network.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Carbonari historical network is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Carbonari historical network unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Carbonari historical network." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "propaganda-due-p2-historical-file", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 22, "name": "Propaganda Due P2 historical file", "suit": "Coins", "score": 79, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/propaganda-due-p2-historical-file.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 79, "networkReach": 80, "updatePriority": 71, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 77, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Propaganda Due P2 historical file is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 79/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Propaganda Due P2 historical file unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 79, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Propaganda Due P2 historical file." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "skull-and-bones", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 23, "name": "Skull and Bones", "suit": "Swords", "score": 78, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/skull-and-bones.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Skull and Bones is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Skull and Bones unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Skull and Bones." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "scroll-and-key", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 24, "name": "Scroll and Key", "suit": "Masks", "score": 77, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/scroll-and-key.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 77, "networkReach": 78, "updatePriority": 69, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 75, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Scroll and Key is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 77/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Scroll and Key unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 77, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Scroll and Key." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "wolf-s-head-society", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 25, "name": "Wolf’s Head Society", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 76, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/wolf-s-head-society.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 76, "networkReach": 77, "updatePriority": 68, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 74, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Wolf’s Head Society is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 76/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Wolf’s Head Society unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 76, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Wolf’s Head Society." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "porcellian-club", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 26, "name": "Porcellian Club", "suit": "Coins", "score": 75, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/porcellian-club.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 75, "networkReach": 76, "updatePriority": 67, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 73, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Porcellian Club is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 75/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Porcellian Club unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 75, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Porcellian Club." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bohemian-club", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 27, "name": "Bohemian Club", "suit": "Swords", "score": 84, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/bohemian-club.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Bohemian Club is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Bohemian Club unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Bohemian Club." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bilderberg-meetings", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 28, "name": "Bilderberg Meetings", "suit": "Masks", "score": 83, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/bilderberg-meetings.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 83, "networkReach": 84, "updatePriority": 75, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 81, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Bilderberg Meetings is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 83/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Bilderberg Meetings unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 83, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Bilderberg Meetings." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "trilateral-commission", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 29, "name": "Trilateral Commission", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 82, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/trilateral-commission.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Trilateral Commission is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Trilateral Commission unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Trilateral Commission." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "pilgrims-society", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 30, "name": "Pilgrims Society", "suit": "Coins", "score": 81, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/pilgrims-society.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 81, "networkReach": 82, "updatePriority": 73, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 79, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Pilgrims Society is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 81/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Pilgrims Society unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 81, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Pilgrims Society." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "round-table-movement", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 31, "name": "Round Table movement", "suit": "Swords", "score": 80, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/round-table-movement.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Round Table movement is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Round Table movement unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Round Table movement." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "le-cercle", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 32, "name": "Le Cercle", "suit": "Masks", "score": 79, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/le-cercle.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 79, "networkReach": 80, "updatePriority": 71, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 77, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Le Cercle is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 79/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Le Cercle unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 79, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Le Cercle." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "club-of-rome", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 33, "name": "Club of Rome", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 78, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/club-of-rome.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Club of Rome is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Club of Rome unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Club of Rome." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "fabian-society", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 34, "name": "Fabian Society", "suit": "Coins", "score": 77, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/fabian-society.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 77, "networkReach": 78, "updatePriority": 69, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 75, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Fabian Society is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 77/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Fabian Society unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 77, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Fabian Society." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "theosophical-society", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 35, "name": "Theosophical Society", "suit": "Swords", "score": 76, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/theosophical-society.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 76, "networkReach": 77, "updatePriority": 68, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 74, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Theosophical Society is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 76/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Theosophical Society unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 76, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Theosophical Society." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "anthroposophical-society", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 36, "name": "Anthroposophical Society", "suit": "Masks", "score": 75, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/anthroposophical-society.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 75, "networkReach": 76, "updatePriority": 67, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 73, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Anthroposophical Society is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 75/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Anthroposophical Society unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 75, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Anthroposophical Society." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "lucis-trust", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 37, "name": "Lucis Trust", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 74, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/lucis-trust.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 74, "networkReach": 75, "updatePriority": 66, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 72, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Lucis Trust is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 74/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Lucis Trust unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 74, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Lucis Trust." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "opus-dei-public-route", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 38, "name": "Opus Dei public route", "suit": "Coins", "score": 73, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/opus-dei-public-route.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 73, "networkReach": 74, "updatePriority": 65, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 71, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Opus Dei public route is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 73/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Opus Dei public route unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 73, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Opus Dei public route." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "jesuit-order-public-route", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 39, "name": "Jesuit order public route", "suit": "Swords", "score": 72, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/jesuit-order-public-route.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 72, "networkReach": 73, "updatePriority": 64, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 70, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Jesuit order public route is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 72/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Jesuit order public route unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 72, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Jesuit order public route." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "order-of-the-holy-sepulchre", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 40, "name": "Order of the Holy Sepulchre", "suit": "Masks", "score": 81, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/order-of-the-holy-sepulchre.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 81, "networkReach": 82, "updatePriority": 73, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 79, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Order of the Holy Sepulchre is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 81/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Order of the Holy Sepulchre unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 81, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Order of the Holy Sepulchre." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "vatican-diplomatic-orders-route", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 41, "name": "Vatican diplomatic orders route", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 80, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/vatican-diplomatic-orders-route.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Vatican diplomatic orders route is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Vatican diplomatic orders route unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Vatican diplomatic orders route." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "ditchley-foundation-network", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 42, "name": "Ditchley Foundation network", "suit": "Coins", "score": 79, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/ditchley-foundation-network.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 79, "networkReach": 80, "updatePriority": 71, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 77, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Ditchley Foundation network is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 79/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Ditchley Foundation network unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 79, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Ditchley Foundation network." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "rhodes-trust-network", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 43, "name": "Rhodes Trust network", "suit": "Swords", "score": 78, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/rhodes-trust-network.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Rhodes Trust network is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Rhodes Trust network unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Rhodes Trust network." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "cecil-rhodes-legacy-route", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 44, "name": "Cecil Rhodes legacy route", "suit": "Masks", "score": 77, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/cecil-rhodes-legacy-route.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 77, "networkReach": 78, "updatePriority": 69, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 75, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Cecil Rhodes legacy route is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 77/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Cecil Rhodes legacy route unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 77, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Cecil Rhodes legacy route." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "rotary-international", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 45, "name": "Rotary International", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 76, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/rotary-international.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 76, "networkReach": 77, "updatePriority": 68, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 74, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Rotary International is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 76/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Rotary International unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 76, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Rotary International." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "lions-clubs-international", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 46, "name": "Lions Clubs International", "suit": "Coins", "score": 75, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/lions-clubs-international.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 75, "networkReach": 76, "updatePriority": 67, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 73, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Lions Clubs International is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 75/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Lions Clubs International unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 75, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Lions Clubs International." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "kiwanis-international", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 47, "name": "Kiwanis International", "suit": "Swords", "score": 74, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/kiwanis-international.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 74, "networkReach": 75, "updatePriority": 66, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 72, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Kiwanis International is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 74/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Kiwanis International unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 74, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Kiwanis International." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "junior-chamber-international", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 48, "name": "Junior Chamber International", "suit": "Masks", "score": 73, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/junior-chamber-international.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 73, "networkReach": 74, "updatePriority": 65, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 71, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Junior Chamber International is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 73/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Junior Chamber International unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 73, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Junior Chamber International." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "mensa-international", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 49, "name": "Mensa International", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 72, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/mensa-international.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 72, "networkReach": 73, "updatePriority": 64, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 70, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Mensa International is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 72/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Mensa International unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 72, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Mensa International." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "world-economic-forum-young-global-leaders", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 50, "name": "World Economic Forum Young Global Leaders", "suit": "Coins", "score": 71, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/world-economic-forum-young-global-leaders.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 71, "networkReach": 72, "updatePriority": 63, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 69, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "World Economic Forum Young Global Leaders is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 71/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for World Economic Forum Young Global Leaders unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 71, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to World Economic Forum Young Global Leaders." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "global-shapers-community", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 51, "name": "Global Shapers Community", "suit": "Swords", "score": 70, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/global-shapers-community.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 70, "networkReach": 71, "updatePriority": 62, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 68, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Global Shapers Community is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 70/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Global Shapers Community unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 70, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Global Shapers Community." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "ted-ted-fellows-network", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 52, "name": "TED / TED Fellows network", "suit": "Masks", "score": 69, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/ted-ted-fellows-network.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 69, "networkReach": 70, "updatePriority": 61, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 67, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "TED / TED Fellows network is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 69/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for TED / TED Fellows network unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 69, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to TED / TED Fellows network." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "un-sustainable-development-goals", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 1, "name": "UN Sustainable Development Goals", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 96, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/un-sustainable-development-goals.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 96, "networkReach": 97, "updatePriority": 96, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 94, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "UN Sustainable Development Goals is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 96/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for UN Sustainable Development Goals unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 96, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to UN Sustainable Development Goals." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "un-pact-for-the-future", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 2, "name": "UN Pact for the Future", "suit": "Coins", "score": 95, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/un-pact-for-the-future.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 95, "networkReach": 96, "updatePriority": 95, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 93, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "UN Pact for the Future is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 95/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for UN Pact for the Future unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 95, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to UN Pact for the Future." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "who-pandemic-agreement", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 3, "name": "WHO Pandemic Agreement", "suit": "Swords", "score": 94, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/who-pandemic-agreement.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 94, "networkReach": 95, "updatePriority": 94, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 92, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "WHO Pandemic Agreement is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 94/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for WHO Pandemic Agreement unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 94, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to WHO Pandemic Agreement." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "international-health-regulations-amendments", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 4, "name": "International Health Regulations amendments", "suit": "Masks", "score": 93, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/international-health-regulations-amendments.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 93, "networkReach": 94, "updatePriority": 93, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 91, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "International Health Regulations amendments is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 93/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for International Health Regulations amendments unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 93, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to International Health Regulations amendments." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "pathogen-access-and-benefit-sharing-pabs-annex", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 5, "name": "Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing PABS annex", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 92, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/pathogen-access-and-benefit-sharing-pabs-annex.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 92, "networkReach": 93, "updatePriority": 92, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 90, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing PABS annex is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 92/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing PABS annex unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 92, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing PABS annex." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "eidas-2-european-digital-identity-wallet", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 6, "name": "eIDAS 2 / European Digital Identity Wallet", "suit": "Coins", "score": 91, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/eidas-2-european-digital-identity-wallet.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 91, "networkReach": 92, "updatePriority": 91, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 89, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "eIDAS 2 / European Digital Identity Wallet is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 91/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for eIDAS 2 / European Digital Identity Wallet unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 91, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to eIDAS 2 / European Digital Identity Wallet." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "eu-digital-services-act", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 7, "name": "EU Digital Services Act", "suit": "Swords", "score": 90, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/eu-digital-services-act.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 90, "networkReach": 91, "updatePriority": 90, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 88, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "EU Digital Services Act is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 90/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for EU Digital Services Act unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 90, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to EU Digital Services Act." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "eu-digital-markets-act", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 8, "name": "EU Digital Markets Act", "suit": "Masks", "score": 89, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/eu-digital-markets-act.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 89, "networkReach": 90, "updatePriority": 89, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 87, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "EU Digital Markets Act is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 89/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for EU Digital Markets Act unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 89, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to EU Digital Markets Act." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "eu-ai-act", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 9, "name": "EU AI Act", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 88, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/eu-ai-act.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 88, "networkReach": 89, "updatePriority": 80, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 86, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "EU AI Act is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 88/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for EU AI Act unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 88, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to EU AI Act." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "uk-online-safety-act", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 10, "name": "UK Online Safety Act", "suit": "Coins", "score": 87, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/uk-online-safety-act.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 87, "networkReach": 88, "updatePriority": 79, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 85, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "UK Online Safety Act is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 87/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for UK Online Safety Act unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 87, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to UK Online Safety Act." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "digital-euro-legislative-package", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 11, "name": "Digital euro legislative package", "suit": "Swords", "score": 86, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/digital-euro-legislative-package.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 86, "networkReach": 87, "updatePriority": 78, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 84, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Digital euro legislative package is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 86/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Digital euro legislative package unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 86, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Digital euro legislative package." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "g20-cross-border-payments-roadmap", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 12, "name": "G20 cross-border payments roadmap", "suit": "Masks", "score": 85, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/g20-cross-border-payments-roadmap.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 85, "networkReach": 86, "updatePriority": 77, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 83, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "G20 cross-border payments roadmap is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 85/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for G20 cross-border payments roadmap unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 85, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to G20 cross-border payments roadmap." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bis-project-mbridge-multi-cbdc-bridge", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 13, "name": "BIS Project mBridge / multi-CBDC bridge", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 84, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/bis-project-mbridge-multi-cbdc-bridge.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "BIS Project mBridge / multi-CBDC bridge is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for BIS Project mBridge / multi-CBDC bridge unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to BIS Project mBridge / multi-CBDC bridge." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "fatf-travel-rule-for-virtual-assets", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 14, "name": "FATF Travel Rule for virtual assets", "suit": "Coins", "score": 93, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/fatf-travel-rule-for-virtual-assets.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 93, "networkReach": 94, "updatePriority": 93, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 91, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "FATF Travel Rule for virtual assets is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 93/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for FATF Travel Rule for virtual assets unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 93, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to FATF Travel Rule for virtual assets." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "oecd-common-reporting-standard", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 15, "name": "OECD Common Reporting Standard", "suit": "Swords", "score": 92, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/oecd-common-reporting-standard.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 92, "networkReach": 93, "updatePriority": 92, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 90, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "OECD Common Reporting Standard is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 92/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for OECD Common Reporting Standard unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 92, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to OECD Common Reporting Standard." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "oecd-crypto-asset-reporting-framework", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 16, "name": "OECD Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework", "suit": "Masks", "score": 91, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/oecd-crypto-asset-reporting-framework.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 91, "networkReach": 92, "updatePriority": 91, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 89, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "OECD Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 91/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for OECD Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 91, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to OECD Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "issb-global-sustainability-disclosure-standards", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 17, "name": "ISSB global sustainability disclosure standards", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 90, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/issb-global-sustainability-disclosure-standards.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 90, "networkReach": 91, "updatePriority": 90, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 88, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "ISSB global sustainability disclosure standards is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 90/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for ISSB global sustainability disclosure standards unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 90, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to ISSB global sustainability disclosure standards." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "eu-corporate-sustainability-reporting-directive", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 18, "name": "EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive", "suit": "Coins", "score": 89, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/eu-corporate-sustainability-reporting-directive.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 89, "networkReach": 90, "updatePriority": 89, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 87, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 89/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 89, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "eu-corporate-sustainability-due-diligence-directive", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 19, "name": "EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive", "suit": "Swords", "score": 88, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/eu-corporate-sustainability-due-diligence-directive.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 88, "networkReach": 89, "updatePriority": 80, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 86, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 88/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 88, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "eu-carbon-border-adjustment-mechanism", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 20, "name": "EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism", "suit": "Masks", "score": 87, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/eu-carbon-border-adjustment-mechanism.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 87, "networkReach": 88, "updatePriority": 79, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 85, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 87/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 87, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "eu-emissions-trading-system-expansion", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 21, "name": "EU Emissions Trading System expansion", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 86, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/eu-emissions-trading-system-expansion.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 86, "networkReach": 87, "updatePriority": 78, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 84, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "EU Emissions Trading System expansion is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 86/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for EU Emissions Trading System expansion unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 86, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to EU Emissions Trading System expansion." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "net-zero-national-commitments", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 22, "name": "Net Zero national commitments", "suit": "Coins", "score": 85, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/net-zero-national-commitments.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 85, "networkReach": 86, "updatePriority": 77, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 83, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Net Zero national commitments is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 85/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Net Zero national commitments unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 85, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Net Zero national commitments." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "nationally-determined-contributions-under-paris-agreement", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 23, "name": "Nationally Determined Contributions under Paris Agreement", "suit": "Swords", "score": 84, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/nationally-determined-contributions-under-paris-agreement.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Nationally Determined Contributions under Paris Agreement is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Nationally Determined Contributions under Paris Agreement unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Nationally Determined Contributions under Paris Agreement." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "global-methane-pledge", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 24, "name": "Global Methane Pledge", "suit": "Masks", "score": 83, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/global-methane-pledge.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 83, "networkReach": 84, "updatePriority": 75, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 81, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Global Methane Pledge is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 83/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Global Methane Pledge unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 83, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Global Methane Pledge." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "corsia-aviation-emissions-scheme", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 25, "name": "CORSIA aviation emissions scheme", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 82, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/corsia-aviation-emissions-scheme.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "CORSIA aviation emissions scheme is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for CORSIA aviation emissions scheme unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to CORSIA aviation emissions scheme." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "smart-city-digital-infrastructure-strategies", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 26, "name": "Smart city digital infrastructure strategies", "suit": "Coins", "score": 81, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/smart-city-digital-infrastructure-strategies.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 81, "networkReach": 82, "updatePriority": 73, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 79, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Smart city digital infrastructure strategies is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 81/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Smart city digital infrastructure strategies unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 81, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Smart city digital infrastructure strategies." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "un-global-compact-for-migration", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 27, "name": "UN Global Compact for Migration", "suit": "Swords", "score": 90, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/un-global-compact-for-migration.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 90, "networkReach": 91, "updatePriority": 90, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 88, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "UN Global Compact for Migration is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 90/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for UN Global Compact for Migration unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 90, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to UN Global Compact for Migration." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "eu-migration-and-asylum-pact", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 28, "name": "EU Migration and Asylum Pact", "suit": "Masks", "score": 89, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/eu-migration-and-asylum-pact.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 89, "networkReach": 90, "updatePriority": 89, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 87, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "EU Migration and Asylum Pact is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 89/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for EU Migration and Asylum Pact unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 89, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to EU Migration and Asylum Pact." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "entry-exit-system-ees", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 29, "name": "Entry/Exit System EES", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 88, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/entry-exit-system-ees.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 88, "networkReach": 89, "updatePriority": 80, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 86, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Entry/Exit System EES is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 88/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Entry/Exit System EES unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 88, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Entry/Exit System EES." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "etias-travel-authorisation", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 30, "name": "ETIAS travel authorisation", "suit": "Coins", "score": 87, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/etias-travel-authorisation.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 87, "networkReach": 88, "updatePriority": 79, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 85, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "ETIAS travel authorisation is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 87/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for ETIAS travel authorisation unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 87, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to ETIAS travel authorisation." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "icao-digital-travel-credential-standards", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 31, "name": "ICAO digital travel credential standards", "suit": "Swords", "score": 86, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/icao-digital-travel-credential-standards.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 86, "networkReach": 87, "updatePriority": 78, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 84, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "ICAO digital travel credential standards is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 86/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for ICAO digital travel credential standards unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 86, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to ICAO digital travel credential standards." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "biometric-border-systems", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 32, "name": "Biometric border systems", "suit": "Masks", "score": 85, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/biometric-border-systems.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 85, "networkReach": 86, "updatePriority": 77, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 83, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Biometric border systems is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 85/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Biometric border systems unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 85, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Biometric border systems." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "digital-health-certificate-frameworks", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 33, "name": "Digital health certificate frameworks", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 84, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/digital-health-certificate-frameworks.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Digital health certificate frameworks is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Digital health certificate frameworks unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Digital health certificate frameworks." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "national-digital-health-records-strategies", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 34, "name": "National digital health records strategies", "suit": "Coins", "score": 83, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/national-digital-health-records-strategies.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 83, "networkReach": 84, "updatePriority": 75, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 81, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "National digital health records strategies is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 83/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for National digital health records strategies unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 83, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to National digital health records strategies." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "electronic-invoicing-mandates", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 35, "name": "Electronic invoicing mandates", "suit": "Swords", "score": 82, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/electronic-invoicing-mandates.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Electronic invoicing mandates is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Electronic invoicing mandates unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Electronic invoicing mandates." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "real-time-tax-reporting-systems", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 36, "name": "Real-time tax reporting systems", "suit": "Masks", "score": 81, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/real-time-tax-reporting-systems.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 81, "networkReach": 82, "updatePriority": 73, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 79, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Real-time tax reporting systems is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 81/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Real-time tax reporting systems unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 81, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Real-time tax reporting systems." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "open-banking-and-digital-finance-rules", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 37, "name": "Open banking and digital finance rules", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 80, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/open-banking-and-digital-finance-rules.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Open banking and digital finance rules is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Open banking and digital finance rules unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Open banking and digital finance rules." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "stablecoin-regulation-frameworks", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 38, "name": "Stablecoin regulation frameworks", "suit": "Coins", "score": 79, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/stablecoin-regulation-frameworks.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 79, "networkReach": 80, "updatePriority": 71, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 77, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Stablecoin regulation frameworks is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 79/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Stablecoin regulation frameworks unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 79, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Stablecoin regulation frameworks." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "mica-crypto-asset-regulation", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 39, "name": "MiCA crypto-asset regulation", "suit": "Swords", "score": 78, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/mica-crypto-asset-regulation.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "MiCA crypto-asset regulation is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for MiCA crypto-asset regulation unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to MiCA crypto-asset regulation." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "central-bank-instant-payment-systems", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 40, "name": "Central bank instant payment systems", "suit": "Masks", "score": 87, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/central-bank-instant-payment-systems.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 87, "networkReach": 88, "updatePriority": 79, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 85, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Central bank instant payment systems is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 87/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Central bank instant payment systems unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 87, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Central bank instant payment systems." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "age-verification-online-access-laws", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 41, "name": "Age verification / online access laws", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 86, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/age-verification-online-access-laws.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 86, "networkReach": 87, "updatePriority": 78, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 84, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Age verification / online access laws is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 86/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Age verification / online access laws unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 86, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Age verification / online access laws." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "platform-transparency-reporting-laws", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 42, "name": "Platform transparency reporting laws", "suit": "Coins", "score": 85, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/platform-transparency-reporting-laws.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 85, "networkReach": 86, "updatePriority": 77, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 83, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Platform transparency reporting laws is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 85/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Platform transparency reporting laws unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 85, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Platform transparency reporting laws." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "trusted-flagger-and-illegal-content-notice-systems", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 43, "name": "Trusted flagger and illegal-content notice systems", "suit": "Swords", "score": 84, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/trusted-flagger-and-illegal-content-notice-systems.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Trusted flagger and illegal-content notice systems is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Trusted flagger and illegal-content notice systems unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Trusted flagger and illegal-content notice systems." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "cyber-resilience-legislation", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 44, "name": "Cyber resilience legislation", "suit": "Masks", "score": 83, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/cyber-resilience-legislation.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 83, "networkReach": 84, "updatePriority": 75, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 81, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Cyber resilience legislation is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 83/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Cyber resilience legislation unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 83, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Cyber resilience legislation." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "nis2-cybersecurity-directive", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 45, "name": "NIS2 cybersecurity directive", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 82, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/nis2-cybersecurity-directive.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "NIS2 cybersecurity directive is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for NIS2 cybersecurity directive unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to NIS2 cybersecurity directive." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "critical-entities-resilience-directive", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 46, "name": "Critical Entities Resilience directive", "suit": "Coins", "score": 81, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/critical-entities-resilience-directive.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 81, "networkReach": 82, "updatePriority": 73, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 79, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Critical Entities Resilience directive is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 81/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Critical Entities Resilience directive unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 81, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Critical Entities Resilience directive." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "digital-public-infrastructure-policies", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 47, "name": "Digital public infrastructure policies", "suit": "Swords", "score": 80, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/digital-public-infrastructure-policies.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Digital public infrastructure policies is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Digital public infrastructure policies unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Digital public infrastructure policies." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "india-stack-dpi-export-model", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 48, "name": "India Stack / DPI export model", "suit": "Masks", "score": 79, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/india-stack-dpi-export-model.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 79, "networkReach": 80, "updatePriority": 71, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 77, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "India Stack / DPI export model is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 79/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for India Stack / DPI export model unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 79, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to India Stack / DPI export model." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "world-bank-id4d-identity-programmes", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 49, "name": "World Bank ID4D identity programmes", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 78, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/world-bank-id4d-identity-programmes.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "World Bank ID4D identity programmes is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for World Bank ID4D identity programmes unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to World Bank ID4D identity programmes." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "govtech-digital-service-mandates", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 50, "name": "GovTech digital service mandates", "suit": "Coins", "score": 77, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/govtech-digital-service-mandates.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 77, "networkReach": 78, "updatePriority": 69, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 75, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "GovTech digital service mandates is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 77/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for GovTech digital service mandates unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 77, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to GovTech digital service mandates." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "cbdc-offline-wallet-design-rules", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 51, "name": "CBDC offline wallet design rules", "suit": "Swords", "score": 76, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/cbdc-offline-wallet-design-rules.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 76, "networkReach": 77, "updatePriority": 68, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 74, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "CBDC offline wallet design rules is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 76/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for CBDC offline wallet design rules unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 76, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to CBDC offline wallet design rules." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "programmable-compliance-in-payments", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 52, "name": "Programmable compliance in payments", "suit": "Masks", "score": 75, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/programmable-compliance-in-payments.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 75, "networkReach": 76, "updatePriority": 67, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 73, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Programmable compliance in payments is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 75/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Programmable compliance in payments unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 75, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Programmable compliance in payments." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "council-on-foreign-relations", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 1, "name": "Council on Foreign Relations", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 93, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/council-on-foreign-relations.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 93, "networkReach": 94, "updatePriority": 93, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 91, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Council on Foreign Relations is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 93/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Council on Foreign Relations unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 93, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Council on Foreign Relations." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "brookings-institution", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 2, "name": "Brookings Institution", "suit": "Coins", "score": 92, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/brookings-institution.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 92, "networkReach": 93, "updatePriority": 92, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 90, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Brookings Institution is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 92/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Brookings Institution unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 92, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Brookings Institution." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "chatham-house", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 3, "name": "Chatham House", "suit": "Swords", "score": 91, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/chatham-house.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 91, "networkReach": 92, "updatePriority": 91, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 89, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Chatham House is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 91/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Chatham House unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 91, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Chatham House." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "rand-corporation", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 4, "name": "RAND Corporation", "suit": "Masks", "score": 90, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/rand-corporation.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 90, "networkReach": 91, "updatePriority": 90, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 88, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "RAND Corporation is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 90/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for RAND Corporation unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 90, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to RAND Corporation." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "center-for-strategic-and-international-studies", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 5, "name": "Center for Strategic and International Studies", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 89, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/center-for-strategic-and-international-studies.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 89, "networkReach": 90, "updatePriority": 89, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 87, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Center for Strategic and International Studies is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 89/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Center for Strategic and International Studies unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 89, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Center for Strategic and International Studies." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "atlantic-council", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 6, "name": "Atlantic Council", "suit": "Coins", "score": 88, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/atlantic-council.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 88, "networkReach": 89, "updatePriority": 80, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 86, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Atlantic Council is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 88/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Atlantic Council unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 88, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Atlantic Council." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "carnegie-endowment-for-international-peace", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 7, "name": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace", "suit": "Swords", "score": 87, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/carnegie-endowment-for-international-peace.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 87, "networkReach": 88, "updatePriority": 79, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 85, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 87/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Carnegie Endowment for International Peace unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 87, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Carnegie Endowment for International Peace." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "heritage-foundation", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 8, "name": "Heritage Foundation", "suit": "Masks", "score": 86, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/heritage-foundation.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 86, "networkReach": 87, "updatePriority": 78, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 84, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Heritage Foundation is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 86/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Heritage Foundation unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 86, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Heritage Foundation." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "american-enterprise-institute", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 9, "name": "American Enterprise Institute", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 85, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/american-enterprise-institute.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 85, "networkReach": 86, "updatePriority": 77, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 83, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "American Enterprise Institute is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 85/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for American Enterprise Institute unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 85, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to American Enterprise Institute." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "cato-institute", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 10, "name": "Cato Institute", "suit": "Coins", "score": 84, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/cato-institute.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Cato Institute is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Cato Institute unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Cato Institute." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "aspen-institute", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 11, "name": "Aspen Institute", "suit": "Swords", "score": 83, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/aspen-institute.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 83, "networkReach": 84, "updatePriority": 75, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 81, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Aspen Institute is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 83/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Aspen Institute unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 83, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Aspen Institute." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "wilson-center", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 12, "name": "Wilson Center", "suit": "Masks", "score": 82, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/wilson-center.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Wilson Center is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Wilson Center unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Wilson Center." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "hoover-institution", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 13, "name": "Hoover Institution", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 81, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/hoover-institution.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 81, "networkReach": 82, "updatePriority": 73, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 79, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Hoover Institution is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 81/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Hoover Institution unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 81, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Hoover Institution." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "belfer-center", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 14, "name": "Belfer Center", "suit": "Coins", "score": 90, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/belfer-center.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 90, "networkReach": 91, "updatePriority": 90, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 88, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Belfer Center is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 90/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Belfer Center unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 90, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Belfer Center." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "peterson-institute-for-international-economics", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 15, "name": "Peterson Institute for International Economics", "suit": "Swords", "score": 89, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/peterson-institute-for-international-economics.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 89, "networkReach": 90, "updatePriority": 89, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 87, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Peterson Institute for International Economics is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 89/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Peterson Institute for International Economics unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 89, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Peterson Institute for International Economics." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "center-for-a-new-american-security", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 16, "name": "Center for a New American Security", "suit": "Masks", "score": 88, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/center-for-a-new-american-security.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 88, "networkReach": 89, "updatePriority": 80, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 86, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Center for a New American Security is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 88/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Center for a New American Security unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 88, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Center for a New American Security." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "new-america", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 17, "name": "New America", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 87, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/new-america.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 87, "networkReach": 88, "updatePriority": 79, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 85, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "New America is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 87/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for New America unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 87, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to New America." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "center-for-american-progress", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 18, "name": "Center for American Progress", "suit": "Coins", "score": 86, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/center-for-american-progress.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 86, "networkReach": 87, "updatePriority": 78, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 84, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Center for American Progress is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 86/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Center for American Progress unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 86, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Center for American Progress." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "hudson-institute", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 19, "name": "Hudson Institute", "suit": "Swords", "score": 85, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/hudson-institute.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 85, "networkReach": 86, "updatePriority": 77, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 83, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Hudson Institute is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 85/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Hudson Institute unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 85, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Hudson Institute." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "manhattan-institute", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 20, "name": "Manhattan Institute", "suit": "Masks", "score": 84, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/manhattan-institute.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Manhattan Institute is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Manhattan Institute unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Manhattan Institute." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "mercatus-center", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 21, "name": "Mercatus Center", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 83, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/mercatus-center.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 83, "networkReach": 84, "updatePriority": 75, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 81, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Mercatus Center is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 83/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Mercatus Center unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 83, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Mercatus Center." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "urban-institute", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 22, "name": "Urban Institute", "suit": "Coins", "score": 82, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/urban-institute.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Urban Institute is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Urban Institute unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Urban Institute." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "world-resources-institute", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 23, "name": "World Resources Institute", "suit": "Swords", "score": 81, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/world-resources-institute.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 81, "networkReach": 82, "updatePriority": 73, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 79, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "World Resources Institute is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 81/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for World Resources Institute unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 81, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to World Resources Institute." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "international-institute-for-sustainable-development", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 24, "name": "International Institute for Sustainable Development", "suit": "Masks", "score": 80, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/international-institute-for-sustainable-development.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "International Institute for Sustainable Development is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for International Institute for Sustainable Development unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to International Institute for Sustainable Development." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "overseas-development-institute", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 25, "name": "Overseas Development Institute", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 79, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/overseas-development-institute.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 79, "networkReach": 80, "updatePriority": 71, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 77, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Overseas Development Institute is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 79/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Overseas Development Institute unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 79, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Overseas Development Institute." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "international-institute-for-strategic-studies", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 26, "name": "International Institute for Strategic Studies", "suit": "Coins", "score": 78, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/international-institute-for-strategic-studies.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "International Institute for Strategic Studies is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for International Institute for Strategic Studies unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to International Institute for Strategic Studies." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "royal-united-services-institute", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 27, "name": "Royal United Services Institute", "suit": "Swords", "score": 87, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/royal-united-services-institute.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 87, "networkReach": 88, "updatePriority": 79, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 85, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Royal United Services Institute is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 87/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Royal United Services Institute unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 87, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Royal United Services Institute." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "sipri", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 28, "name": "SIPRI", "suit": "Masks", "score": 86, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/sipri.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 86, "networkReach": 87, "updatePriority": 78, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 84, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "SIPRI is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 86/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for SIPRI unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 86, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to SIPRI." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "german-marshall-fund", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 29, "name": "German Marshall Fund", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 85, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/german-marshall-fund.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 85, "networkReach": 86, "updatePriority": 77, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 83, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "German Marshall Fund is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 85/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for German Marshall Fund unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 85, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to German Marshall Fund." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bruegel", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 30, "name": "Bruegel", "suit": "Coins", "score": 84, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/bruegel.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Bruegel is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Bruegel unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Bruegel." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "centre-for-european-policy-studies", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 31, "name": "Centre for European Policy Studies", "suit": "Swords", "score": 83, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/centre-for-european-policy-studies.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 83, "networkReach": 84, "updatePriority": 75, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 81, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Centre for European Policy Studies is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 83/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Centre for European Policy Studies unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 83, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Centre for European Policy Studies." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "european-council-on-foreign-relations", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 32, "name": "European Council on Foreign Relations", "suit": "Masks", "score": 82, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/european-council-on-foreign-relations.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "European Council on Foreign Relations is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for European Council on Foreign Relations unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to European Council on Foreign Relations." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "swp-berlin", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 33, "name": "SWP Berlin", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 81, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/swp-berlin.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 81, "networkReach": 82, "updatePriority": 73, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 79, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "SWP Berlin is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 81/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for SWP Berlin unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 81, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to SWP Berlin." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "institut-fran-ais-des-relations-internationales", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 34, "name": "Institut français des relations internationales", "suit": "Coins", "score": 80, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/institut-fran-ais-des-relations-internationales.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Institut français des relations internationales is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Institut français des relations internationales unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Institut français des relations internationales." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "institut-montaigne", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 35, "name": "Institut Montaigne", "suit": "Swords", "score": 79, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/institut-montaigne.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 79, "networkReach": 80, "updatePriority": 71, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 77, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Institut Montaigne is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 79/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Institut Montaigne unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 79, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Institut Montaigne." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "clingendael-institute", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 36, "name": "Clingendael Institute", "suit": "Masks", "score": 78, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/clingendael-institute.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Clingendael Institute is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Clingendael Institute unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Clingendael Institute." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "lowy-institute", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 37, "name": "Lowy Institute", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 77, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/lowy-institute.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 77, "networkReach": 78, "updatePriority": 69, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 75, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Lowy Institute is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 77/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Lowy Institute unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 77, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Lowy Institute." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "australian-strategic-policy-institute", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 38, "name": "Australian Strategic Policy Institute", "suit": "Coins", "score": 76, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/australian-strategic-policy-institute.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 76, "networkReach": 77, "updatePriority": 68, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 74, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Australian Strategic Policy Institute is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 76/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Australian Strategic Policy Institute unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 76, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Australian Strategic Policy Institute." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "observer-research-foundation", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 39, "name": "Observer Research Foundation", "suit": "Swords", "score": 75, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/observer-research-foundation.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 75, "networkReach": 76, "updatePriority": 67, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 73, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Observer Research Foundation is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 75/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Observer Research Foundation unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 75, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Observer Research Foundation." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "institute-for-defence-studies-and-analyses", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 40, "name": "Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses", "suit": "Masks", "score": 84, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/institute-for-defence-studies-and-analyses.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "japan-institute-of-international-affairs", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 41, "name": "Japan Institute of International Affairs", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 83, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/japan-institute-of-international-affairs.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 83, "networkReach": 84, "updatePriority": 75, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 81, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Japan Institute of International Affairs is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 83/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Japan Institute of International Affairs unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 83, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Japan Institute of International Affairs." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "korea-institute-for-national-unification", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 42, "name": "Korea Institute for National Unification", "suit": "Coins", "score": 82, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/korea-institute-for-national-unification.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Korea Institute for National Unification is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Korea Institute for National Unification unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Korea Institute for National Unification." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "china-institutes-of-contemporary-international-relations", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 43, "name": "China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations", "suit": "Swords", "score": 81, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/china-institutes-of-contemporary-international-relations.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 81, "networkReach": 82, "updatePriority": 73, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 79, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 81/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 81, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "chinese-academy-of-social-sciences", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 44, "name": "Chinese Academy of Social Sciences", "suit": "Masks", "score": 80, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/chinese-academy-of-social-sciences.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Chinese Academy of Social Sciences is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Chinese Academy of Social Sciences unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Chinese Academy of Social Sciences." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "carnegie-china-route", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 45, "name": "Carnegie China route", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 79, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/carnegie-china-route.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 79, "networkReach": 80, "updatePriority": 71, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 77, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Carnegie China route is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 79/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Carnegie China route unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 79, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Carnegie China route." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "kiel-institute-for-the-world-economy", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 46, "name": "Kiel Institute for the World Economy", "suit": "Coins", "score": 78, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/kiel-institute-for-the-world-economy.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Kiel Institute for the World Economy is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Kiel Institute for the World Economy unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Kiel Institute for the World Economy." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "ifo-institute", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 47, "name": "Ifo Institute", "suit": "Swords", "score": 77, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/ifo-institute.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 77, "networkReach": 78, "updatePriority": 69, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 75, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Ifo Institute is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 77/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Ifo Institute unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 77, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Ifo Institute." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "club-of-rome", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 48, "name": "Club of Rome", "suit": "Masks", "score": 76, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/club-of-rome.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 76, "networkReach": 77, "updatePriority": 68, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 74, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Club of Rome is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 76/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Club of Rome unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 76, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Club of Rome." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "world-economic-forum-policy-platform", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 49, "name": "World Economic Forum policy platform", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 75, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/world-economic-forum-policy-platform.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 75, "networkReach": 76, "updatePriority": 67, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 73, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "World Economic Forum policy platform is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 75/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for World Economic Forum policy platform unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 75, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to World Economic Forum policy platform." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bis-research-route", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 50, "name": "BIS research route", "suit": "Coins", "score": 74, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/bis-research-route.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 74, "networkReach": 75, "updatePriority": 66, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 72, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "BIS research route is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 74/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for BIS research route unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 74, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to BIS research route." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "imf-policy-research-route", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 51, "name": "IMF policy research route", "suit": "Swords", "score": 73, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/imf-policy-research-route.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 73, "networkReach": 74, "updatePriority": 65, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 71, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "IMF policy research route is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 73/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for IMF policy research route unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 73, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to IMF policy research route." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "oecd-policy-research-route", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 52, "name": "OECD policy research route", "suit": "Masks", "score": 72, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/oecd-policy-research-route.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 72, "networkReach": 73, "updatePriority": 64, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 70, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "OECD policy research route is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 72/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for OECD policy research route unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 72, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to OECD policy research route." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "orsini", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 1, "name": "Orsini", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 94, "lane": "Roman / papal nobility", "route": "black-nobility/orsini.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 94, "networkReach": 95, "updatePriority": 94, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 92, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Orsini is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward Roman / papal nobility. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 94/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Orsini unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 94, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Orsini." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "colonna", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 2, "name": "Colonna", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 93, "lane": "Roman / papal nobility", "route": "black-nobility/colonna.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 93, "networkReach": 94, "updatePriority": 93, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 91, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Colonna is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward Roman / papal nobility. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 93/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Colonna unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 93, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Colonna." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "borghese", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 3, "name": "Borghese", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 92, "lane": "Roman / papal nobility", "route": "black-nobility/borghese.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 92, "networkReach": 93, "updatePriority": 92, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 90, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Borghese is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward Roman / papal nobility. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 92/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Borghese unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 92, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Borghese." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "barberini", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 4, "name": "Barberini", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 91, "lane": "Roman / papal nobility", "route": "black-nobility/barberini.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 91, "networkReach": 92, "updatePriority": 91, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 89, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Barberini is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward Roman / papal nobility. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 91/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Barberini unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 91, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Barberini." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "chigi", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 5, "name": "Chigi", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 90, "lane": "Roman / papal nobility", "route": "black-nobility/chigi.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 90, "networkReach": 91, "updatePriority": 90, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 88, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Chigi is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward Roman / papal nobility. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 90/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Chigi unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 90, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Chigi." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "aldobrandini", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 6, "name": "Aldobrandini", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 89, "lane": "Roman / papal nobility", "route": "black-nobility/aldobrandini.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 89, "networkReach": 90, "updatePriority": 89, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 87, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Aldobrandini is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward Roman / papal nobility. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 89/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Aldobrandini unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 89, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Aldobrandini." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "pamphilj", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 7, "name": "Pamphilj", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 88, "lane": "Roman / papal nobility", "route": "black-nobility/pamphilj.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 88, "networkReach": 89, "updatePriority": 80, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 86, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Pamphilj is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward Roman / papal nobility. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 88/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Pamphilj unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 88, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Pamphilj." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "odescalchi", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 8, "name": "Odescalchi", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 87, "lane": "Roman / papal nobility", "route": "black-nobility/odescalchi.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 87, "networkReach": 88, "updatePriority": 79, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 85, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Odescalchi is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward Roman / papal nobility. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 87/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Odescalchi unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 87, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Odescalchi." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "massimo", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 9, "name": "Massimo", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 86, "lane": "Roman / papal nobility", "route": "black-nobility/massimo.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 86, "networkReach": 87, "updatePriority": 78, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 84, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Massimo is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward Roman / papal nobility. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 86/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Massimo unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 86, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Massimo." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "ruspoli", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 10, "name": "Ruspoli", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 85, "lane": "Roman / papal nobility", "route": "black-nobility/ruspoli.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 85, "networkReach": 86, "updatePriority": 77, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 83, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Ruspoli is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward Roman / papal nobility. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 85/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Ruspoli unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 85, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Ruspoli." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "torlonia", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 11, "name": "Torlonia", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 84, "lane": "Roman / papal nobility", "route": "black-nobility/torlonia.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Torlonia is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward Roman / papal nobility. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Torlonia unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Torlonia." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "caetani", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 12, "name": "Caetani", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 83, "lane": "Roman / papal nobility", "route": "black-nobility/caetani.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 83, "networkReach": 84, "updatePriority": 75, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 81, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Caetani is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward Roman / papal nobility. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 83/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Caetani unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 83, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Caetani." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "boncompagni-ludovisi", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 13, "name": "Boncompagni Ludovisi", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 82, "lane": "Roman / papal nobility", "route": "black-nobility/boncompagni-ludovisi.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Boncompagni Ludovisi is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward Roman / papal nobility. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Boncompagni Ludovisi unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Boncompagni Ludovisi." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "doria", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 14, "name": "Doria", "suit": "Coins", "score": 88, "lane": "merchant, banking and maritime nobility", "route": "black-nobility/doria.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 88, "networkReach": 89, "updatePriority": 80, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 86, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Doria is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward merchant, banking and maritime nobility. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 88/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Doria unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 88, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Doria." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "spinola", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 15, "name": "Spinola", "suit": "Coins", "score": 87, "lane": "merchant, banking and maritime nobility", "route": "black-nobility/spinola.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 87, "networkReach": 88, "updatePriority": 79, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 85, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Spinola is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward merchant, banking and maritime nobility. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 87/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Spinola unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 87, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Spinola." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "giustiniani", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 16, "name": "Giustiniani", "suit": "Coins", "score": 86, "lane": "merchant, banking and maritime nobility", "route": "black-nobility/giustiniani.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 86, "networkReach": 87, "updatePriority": 78, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 84, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Giustiniani is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward merchant, banking and maritime nobility. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 86/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Giustiniani unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 86, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Giustiniani." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "contarini", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 17, "name": "Contarini", "suit": "Coins", "score": 85, "lane": "merchant, banking and maritime nobility", "route": "black-nobility/contarini.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 85, "networkReach": 86, "updatePriority": 77, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 83, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Contarini is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward merchant, banking and maritime nobility. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 85/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Contarini unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 85, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Contarini." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "mocenigo", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 18, "name": "Mocenigo", "suit": "Coins", "score": 84, "lane": "merchant, banking and maritime nobility", "route": "black-nobility/mocenigo.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Mocenigo is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward merchant, banking and maritime nobility. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Mocenigo unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Mocenigo." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "cornaro", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 19, "name": "Cornaro", "suit": "Coins", "score": 83, "lane": "merchant, banking and maritime nobility", "route": "black-nobility/cornaro.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 83, "networkReach": 84, "updatePriority": 75, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 81, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Cornaro is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward merchant, banking and maritime nobility. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 83/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Cornaro unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 83, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Cornaro." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "morosini", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 20, "name": "Morosini", "suit": "Coins", "score": 82, "lane": "merchant, banking and maritime nobility", "route": "black-nobility/morosini.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Morosini is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward merchant, banking and maritime nobility. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Morosini unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Morosini." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "loredan", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 21, "name": "Loredan", "suit": "Coins", "score": 81, "lane": "merchant, banking and maritime nobility", "route": "black-nobility/loredan.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 81, "networkReach": 82, "updatePriority": 73, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 79, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Loredan is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward merchant, banking and maritime nobility. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 81/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Loredan unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 81, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Loredan." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "gritti", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 22, "name": "Gritti", "suit": "Coins", "score": 80, "lane": "merchant, banking and maritime nobility", "route": "black-nobility/gritti.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Gritti is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward merchant, banking and maritime nobility. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Gritti unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Gritti." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "vendramin", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 23, "name": "Vendramin", "suit": "Coins", "score": 79, "lane": "merchant, banking and maritime nobility", "route": "black-nobility/vendramin.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 79, "networkReach": 80, "updatePriority": 71, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 77, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Vendramin is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward merchant, banking and maritime nobility. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 79/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Vendramin unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 79, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Vendramin." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bragadin", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 24, "name": "Bragadin", "suit": "Coins", "score": 78, "lane": "merchant, banking and maritime nobility", "route": "black-nobility/bragadin.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Bragadin is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward merchant, banking and maritime nobility. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Bragadin unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Bragadin." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "querini", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 25, "name": "Querini", "suit": "Coins", "score": 77, "lane": "merchant, banking and maritime nobility", "route": "black-nobility/querini.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 77, "networkReach": 78, "updatePriority": 69, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 75, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Querini is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward merchant, banking and maritime nobility. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 77/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Querini unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 77, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Querini." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "pisani", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 26, "name": "Pisani", "suit": "Coins", "score": 76, "lane": "merchant, banking and maritime nobility", "route": "black-nobility/pisani.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 76, "networkReach": 77, "updatePriority": 68, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 74, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Pisani is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward merchant, banking and maritime nobility. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 76/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Pisani unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 76, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Pisani." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "medici", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 27, "name": "Medici", "suit": "Swords", "score": 84, "lane": "territorial, princely and martial houses", "route": "black-nobility/medici.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Medici is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward territorial, princely and martial houses. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Medici unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Medici." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "este", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 28, "name": "Este", "suit": "Swords", "score": 83, "lane": "territorial, princely and martial houses", "route": "black-nobility/este.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 83, "networkReach": 84, "updatePriority": 75, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 81, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Este is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward territorial, princely and martial houses. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 83/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Este unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 83, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Este." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "gonzaga", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 29, "name": "Gonzaga", "suit": "Swords", "score": 82, "lane": "territorial, princely and martial houses", "route": "black-nobility/gonzaga.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Gonzaga is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward territorial, princely and martial houses. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Gonzaga unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Gonzaga." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "sforza", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 30, "name": "Sforza", "suit": "Swords", "score": 81, "lane": "territorial, princely and martial houses", "route": "black-nobility/sforza.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 81, "networkReach": 82, "updatePriority": 73, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 79, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Sforza is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward territorial, princely and martial houses. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 81/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Sforza unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 81, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Sforza." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "visconti", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 31, "name": "Visconti", "suit": "Swords", "score": 80, "lane": "territorial, princely and martial houses", "route": "black-nobility/visconti.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Visconti is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward territorial, princely and martial houses. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Visconti unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Visconti." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "farnese", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 32, "name": "Farnese", "suit": "Swords", "score": 79, "lane": "territorial, princely and martial houses", "route": "black-nobility/farnese.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 79, "networkReach": 80, "updatePriority": 71, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 77, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Farnese is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward territorial, princely and martial houses. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 79/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Farnese unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 79, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Farnese." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "savoy", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 33, "name": "Savoy", "suit": "Swords", "score": 78, "lane": "territorial, princely and martial houses", "route": "black-nobility/savoy.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Savoy is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward territorial, princely and martial houses. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Savoy unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Savoy." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "grimaldi", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 34, "name": "Grimaldi", "suit": "Swords", "score": 77, "lane": "territorial, princely and martial houses", "route": "black-nobility/grimaldi.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 77, "networkReach": 78, "updatePriority": 69, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 75, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Grimaldi is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward territorial, princely and martial houses. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 77/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Grimaldi unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 77, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Grimaldi." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "pallavicini", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 35, "name": "Pallavicini", "suit": "Swords", "score": 76, "lane": "territorial, princely and martial houses", "route": "black-nobility/pallavicini.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 76, "networkReach": 77, "updatePriority": 68, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 74, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Pallavicini is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward territorial, princely and martial houses. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 76/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Pallavicini unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 76, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Pallavicini." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "malaspina", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 36, "name": "Malaspina", "suit": "Swords", "score": 75, "lane": "territorial, princely and martial houses", "route": "black-nobility/malaspina.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 75, "networkReach": 76, "updatePriority": 67, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 73, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Malaspina is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward territorial, princely and martial houses. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 75/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Malaspina unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 75, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Malaspina." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bentivoglio", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 37, "name": "Bentivoglio", "suit": "Swords", "score": 74, "lane": "territorial, princely and martial houses", "route": "black-nobility/bentivoglio.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 74, "networkReach": 75, "updatePriority": 66, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 72, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Bentivoglio is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward territorial, princely and martial houses. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 74/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Bentivoglio unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 74, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Bentivoglio." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "montefeltro", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 38, "name": "Montefeltro", "suit": "Swords", "score": 73, "lane": "territorial, princely and martial houses", "route": "black-nobility/montefeltro.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 73, "networkReach": 74, "updatePriority": 65, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 71, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Montefeltro is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward territorial, princely and martial houses. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 73/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Montefeltro unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 73, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Montefeltro." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "della-rovere", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 39, "name": "della Rovere", "suit": "Swords", "score": 72, "lane": "territorial, princely and martial houses", "route": "black-nobility/della-rovere.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 72, "networkReach": 73, "updatePriority": 64, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 70, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "della Rovere is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward territorial, princely and martial houses. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 72/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for della Rovere unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 72, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to della Rovere." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "habsburg-lorraine", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 40, "name": "Habsburg-Lorraine", "suit": "Masks", "score": 80, "lane": "allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks", "route": "black-nobility/habsburg-lorraine.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Habsburg-Lorraine is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Habsburg-Lorraine unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Habsburg-Lorraine." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bourbon-two-sicilies", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 41, "name": "Bourbon-Two Sicilies", "suit": "Masks", "score": 79, "lane": "allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks", "route": "black-nobility/bourbon-two-sicilies.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 79, "networkReach": 80, "updatePriority": 71, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 77, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Bourbon-Two Sicilies is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 79/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Bourbon-Two Sicilies unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 79, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Bourbon-Two Sicilies." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bourbon-parma", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 42, "name": "Bourbon-Parma", "suit": "Masks", "score": 78, "lane": "allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks", "route": "black-nobility/bourbon-parma.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Bourbon-Parma is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Bourbon-Parma unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Bourbon-Parma." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "liechtenstein", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 43, "name": "Liechtenstein", "suit": "Masks", "score": 77, "lane": "allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks", "route": "black-nobility/liechtenstein.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 77, "networkReach": 78, "updatePriority": 69, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 75, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Liechtenstein is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 77/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Liechtenstein unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 77, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Liechtenstein." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "schwarzenberg", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 44, "name": "Schwarzenberg", "suit": "Masks", "score": 76, "lane": "allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks", "route": "black-nobility/schwarzenberg.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 76, "networkReach": 77, "updatePriority": 68, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 74, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Schwarzenberg is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 76/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Schwarzenberg unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 76, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Schwarzenberg." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "lobkowicz", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 45, "name": "Lobkowicz", "suit": "Masks", "score": 75, "lane": "allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks", "route": "black-nobility/lobkowicz.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 75, "networkReach": 76, "updatePriority": 67, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 73, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Lobkowicz is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 75/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Lobkowicz unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 75, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Lobkowicz." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "thurn-und-taxis", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 46, "name": "Thurn und Taxis", "suit": "Masks", "score": 74, "lane": "allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks", "route": "black-nobility/thurn-und-taxis.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 74, "networkReach": 75, "updatePriority": 66, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 72, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Thurn und Taxis is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 74/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Thurn und Taxis unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 74, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Thurn und Taxis." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "braganza", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 47, "name": "Braganza", "suit": "Masks", "score": 73, "lane": "allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks", "route": "black-nobility/braganza.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 73, "networkReach": 74, "updatePriority": 65, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 71, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Braganza is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 73/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Braganza unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 73, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Braganza." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "wittelsbach", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 48, "name": "Wittelsbach", "suit": "Masks", "score": 72, "lane": "allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks", "route": "black-nobility/wittelsbach.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 72, "networkReach": 73, "updatePriority": 64, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 70, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Wittelsbach is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 72/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Wittelsbach unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 72, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Wittelsbach." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "hohenzollern-sigmaringen", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 49, "name": "Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen", "suit": "Masks", "score": 71, "lane": "allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks", "route": "black-nobility/hohenzollern-sigmaringen.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 71, "networkReach": 72, "updatePriority": 63, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 69, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 71/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 71, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "orange-nassau", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 50, "name": "Orange-Nassau", "suit": "Masks", "score": 70, "lane": "allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks", "route": "black-nobility/orange-nassau.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 70, "networkReach": 71, "updatePriority": 62, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 68, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Orange-Nassau is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 70/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Orange-Nassau unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 70, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Orange-Nassau." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "oldenburg", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 51, "name": "Oldenburg", "suit": "Masks", "score": 69, "lane": "allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks", "route": "black-nobility/oldenburg.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 69, "networkReach": 70, "updatePriority": 61, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 67, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Oldenburg is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 69/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Oldenburg unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 69, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Oldenburg." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "arenberg", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 52, "name": "Arenberg", "suit": "Masks", "score": 68, "lane": "allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks", "route": "black-nobility/arenberg.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 68, "networkReach": 69, "updatePriority": 60, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 66, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Arenberg is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 68/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Arenberg unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 68, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Arenberg." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "vatican-city-holy-see", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 1, "name": "Vatican City / Holy See", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 98, "lane": "sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/vatican-city-holy-see.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 98, "networkReach": 99, "updatePriority": 98, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 96, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Vatican City / Holy See is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 98/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Vatican City / Holy See unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 98, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Vatican City / Holy See." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "city-of-london", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 2, "name": "City of London", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 97, "lane": "sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/city-of-london.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 97, "networkReach": 98, "updatePriority": 97, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 95, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "City of London is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 97/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for City of London unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 97, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to City of London." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "washington-d-c", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 3, "name": "Washington, D.C.", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 96, "lane": "sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/washington-d-c.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 96, "networkReach": 97, "updatePriority": 96, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 94, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Washington, D.C. is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 96/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Washington, D.C. unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 96, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Washington, D.C.." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "brussels-eu-quarter", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 4, "name": "Brussels / EU Quarter", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 95, "lane": "sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/brussels-eu-quarter.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 95, "networkReach": 96, "updatePriority": 95, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 93, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Brussels / EU Quarter is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 95/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Brussels / EU Quarter unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 95, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Brussels / EU Quarter." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "geneva", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 5, "name": "Geneva", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 94, "lane": "sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/geneva.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 94, "networkReach": 95, "updatePriority": 94, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 92, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Geneva is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 94/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Geneva unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 94, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Geneva." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "new-york-city", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 6, "name": "New York City", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 93, "lane": "sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/new-york-city.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 93, "networkReach": 94, "updatePriority": 93, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 91, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "New York City is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 93/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for New York City unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 93, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to New York City." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "basel", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 7, "name": "Basel", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 92, "lane": "sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/basel.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 92, "networkReach": 93, "updatePriority": 92, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 90, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Basel is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 92/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Basel unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 92, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Basel." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "frankfurt", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 8, "name": "Frankfurt", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 91, "lane": "sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/frankfurt.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 91, "networkReach": 92, "updatePriority": 91, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 89, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Frankfurt is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 91/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Frankfurt unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 91, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Frankfurt." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "the-hague", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 9, "name": "The Hague", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 90, "lane": "sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/the-hague.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 90, "networkReach": 91, "updatePriority": 90, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 88, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "The Hague is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 90/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for The Hague unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 90, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to The Hague." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "paris-oecd-fatf-route", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 10, "name": "Paris / OECD-FATF Route", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 89, "lane": "sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/paris-oecd-fatf-route.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 89, "networkReach": 90, "updatePriority": 89, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 87, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Paris / OECD-FATF Route is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 89/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Paris / OECD-FATF Route unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 89, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Paris / OECD-FATF Route." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "beijing", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 11, "name": "Beijing", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 88, "lane": "sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/beijing.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 88, "networkReach": 89, "updatePriority": 80, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 86, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Beijing is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 88/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Beijing unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 88, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Beijing." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "moscow", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 12, "name": "Moscow", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 87, "lane": "sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/moscow.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 87, "networkReach": 88, "updatePriority": 79, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 85, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Moscow is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 87/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Moscow unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 87, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Moscow." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "riyadh", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 13, "name": "Riyadh", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 86, "lane": "sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/riyadh.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 86, "networkReach": 87, "updatePriority": 78, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 84, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Riyadh is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 86/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Riyadh unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 86, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Riyadh." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "cayman-islands", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 14, "name": "Cayman Islands", "suit": "Coins", "score": 91, "lane": "financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/cayman-islands.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 91, "networkReach": 92, "updatePriority": 91, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 89, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Cayman Islands is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 91/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Cayman Islands unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 91, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Cayman Islands." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "british-virgin-islands", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 15, "name": "British Virgin Islands", "suit": "Coins", "score": 90, "lane": "financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/british-virgin-islands.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 90, "networkReach": 91, "updatePriority": 90, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 88, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "British Virgin Islands is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 90/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for British Virgin Islands unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 90, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to British Virgin Islands." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bermuda", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 16, "name": "Bermuda", "suit": "Coins", "score": 89, "lane": "financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/bermuda.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 89, "networkReach": 90, "updatePriority": 89, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 87, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Bermuda is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 89/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Bermuda unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 89, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Bermuda." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "luxembourg", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 17, "name": "Luxembourg", "suit": "Coins", "score": 88, "lane": "financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/luxembourg.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 88, "networkReach": 89, "updatePriority": 80, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 86, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Luxembourg is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 88/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Luxembourg unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 88, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Luxembourg." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "switzerland", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 18, "name": "Switzerland", "suit": "Coins", "score": 87, "lane": "financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/switzerland.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 87, "networkReach": 88, "updatePriority": 79, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 85, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Switzerland is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 87/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Switzerland unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 87, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Switzerland." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "singapore", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 19, "name": "Singapore", "suit": "Coins", "score": 86, "lane": "financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/singapore.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 86, "networkReach": 87, "updatePriority": 78, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 84, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Singapore is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 86/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Singapore unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 86, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Singapore." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "hong-kong", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 20, "name": "Hong Kong", "suit": "Coins", "score": 85, "lane": "financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/hong-kong.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 85, "networkReach": 86, "updatePriority": 77, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 83, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Hong Kong is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 85/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Hong Kong unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 85, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Hong Kong." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "netherlands", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 21, "name": "Netherlands", "suit": "Coins", "score": 84, "lane": "financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/netherlands.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Netherlands is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Netherlands unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Netherlands." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "ireland", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 22, "name": "Ireland", "suit": "Coins", "score": 83, "lane": "financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/ireland.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 83, "networkReach": 84, "updatePriority": 75, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 81, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Ireland is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 83/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Ireland unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 83, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Ireland." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "delaware", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 23, "name": "Delaware", "suit": "Coins", "score": 82, "lane": "financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/delaware.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Delaware is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Delaware unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Delaware." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "jersey", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 24, "name": "Jersey", "suit": "Coins", "score": 81, "lane": "financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/jersey.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 81, "networkReach": 82, "updatePriority": 73, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 79, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Jersey is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 81/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Jersey unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 81, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Jersey." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "guernsey", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 25, "name": "Guernsey", "suit": "Coins", "score": 80, "lane": "financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/guernsey.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Guernsey is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Guernsey unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Guernsey." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "isle-of-man", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 26, "name": "Isle of Man", "suit": "Coins", "score": 79, "lane": "financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/isle-of-man.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 79, "networkReach": 80, "updatePriority": 71, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 77, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Isle of Man is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 79/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Isle of Man unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 79, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Isle of Man." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "dubai-difc", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 27, "name": "Dubai / DIFC", "suit": "Courts", "score": 84, "lane": "legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/dubai-difc.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Dubai / DIFC is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues. The Courts suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Dubai / DIFC unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Dubai / DIFC." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "abu-dhabi-adgm", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 28, "name": "Abu Dhabi / ADGM", "suit": "Courts", "score": 83, "lane": "legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/abu-dhabi-adgm.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 83, "networkReach": 84, "updatePriority": 75, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 81, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Abu Dhabi / ADGM is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues. The Courts suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 83/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Abu Dhabi / ADGM unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 83, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Abu Dhabi / ADGM." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "monaco", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 29, "name": "Monaco", "suit": "Courts", "score": 82, "lane": "legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/monaco.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Monaco is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues. The Courts suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Monaco unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Monaco." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "liechtenstein", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 30, "name": "Liechtenstein", "suit": "Courts", "score": 81, "lane": "legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/liechtenstein.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 81, "networkReach": 82, "updatePriority": 73, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 79, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Liechtenstein is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues. The Courts suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 81/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Liechtenstein unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 81, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Liechtenstein." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "panama", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 31, "name": "Panama", "suit": "Courts", "score": 80, "lane": "legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/panama.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Panama is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues. The Courts suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Panama unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Panama." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bahamas", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 32, "name": "Bahamas", "suit": "Courts", "score": 79, "lane": "legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/bahamas.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 79, "networkReach": 80, "updatePriority": 71, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 77, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Bahamas is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues. The Courts suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 79/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Bahamas unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 79, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Bahamas." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "malta", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 33, "name": "Malta", "suit": "Courts", "score": 78, "lane": "legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/malta.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Malta is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues. The Courts suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Malta unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Malta." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "cyprus", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 34, "name": "Cyprus", "suit": "Courts", "score": 77, "lane": "legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/cyprus.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 77, "networkReach": 78, "updatePriority": 69, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 75, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Cyprus is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues. The Courts suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 77/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Cyprus unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 77, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Cyprus." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "mauritius", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 35, "name": "Mauritius", "suit": "Courts", "score": 76, "lane": "legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/mauritius.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 76, "networkReach": 77, "updatePriority": 68, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 74, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Mauritius is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues. The Courts suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 76/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Mauritius unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 76, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Mauritius." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "seychelles", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 36, "name": "Seychelles", "suit": "Courts", "score": 75, "lane": "legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/seychelles.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 75, "networkReach": 76, "updatePriority": 67, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 73, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Seychelles is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues. The Courts suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 75/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Seychelles unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 75, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Seychelles." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "belize", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 37, "name": "Belize", "suit": "Courts", "score": 74, "lane": "legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/belize.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 74, "networkReach": 75, "updatePriority": 66, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 72, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Belize is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues. The Courts suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 74/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Belize unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 74, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Belize." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "gibraltar", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 38, "name": "Gibraltar", "suit": "Courts", "score": 73, "lane": "legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/gibraltar.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 73, "networkReach": 74, "updatePriority": 65, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 71, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Gibraltar is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues. The Courts suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 73/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Gibraltar unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 73, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Gibraltar." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "andorra", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 39, "name": "Andorra", "suit": "Courts", "score": 72, "lane": "legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/andorra.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 72, "networkReach": 73, "updatePriority": 64, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 70, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Andorra is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues. The Courts suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 72/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Andorra unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 72, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Andorra." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "san-marino", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 40, "name": "San Marino", "suit": "Courts", "score": 82, "lane": "legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/san-marino.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "San Marino is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues. The Courts suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for San Marino unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to San Marino." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "macau", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 41, "name": "Macau", "suit": "Masks", "score": 77, "lane": "special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/macau.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 77, "networkReach": 78, "updatePriority": 69, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 75, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Macau is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 77/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Macau unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 77, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Macau." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "labuan", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 42, "name": "Labuan", "suit": "Masks", "score": 76, "lane": "special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/labuan.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 76, "networkReach": 77, "updatePriority": 68, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 74, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Labuan is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 76/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Labuan unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 76, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Labuan." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "cook-islands", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 43, "name": "Cook Islands", "suit": "Masks", "score": 75, "lane": "special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/cook-islands.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 75, "networkReach": 76, "updatePriority": 67, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 73, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Cook Islands is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 75/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Cook Islands unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 75, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Cook Islands." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "marshall-islands", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 44, "name": "Marshall Islands", "suit": "Masks", "score": 74, "lane": "special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/marshall-islands.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 74, "networkReach": 75, "updatePriority": 66, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 72, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Marshall Islands is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 74/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Marshall Islands unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 74, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Marshall Islands." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "st-kitts-and-nevis", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 45, "name": "St Kitts and Nevis", "suit": "Masks", "score": 73, "lane": "special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/st-kitts-and-nevis.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 73, "networkReach": 74, "updatePriority": 65, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 71, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "St Kitts and Nevis is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 73/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for St Kitts and Nevis unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 73, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to St Kitts and Nevis." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "turks-and-caicos-islands", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 46, "name": "Turks and Caicos Islands", "suit": "Masks", "score": 72, "lane": "special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/turks-and-caicos-islands.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 72, "networkReach": 73, "updatePriority": 64, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 70, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Turks and Caicos Islands is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 72/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Turks and Caicos Islands unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 72, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Turks and Caicos Islands." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "anguilla", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 47, "name": "Anguilla", "suit": "Masks", "score": 71, "lane": "special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/anguilla.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 71, "networkReach": 72, "updatePriority": 63, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 69, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Anguilla is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 71/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Anguilla unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 71, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Anguilla." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "samoa", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 48, "name": "Samoa", "suit": "Masks", "score": 70, "lane": "special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/samoa.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 70, "networkReach": 71, "updatePriority": 62, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 68, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Samoa is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 70/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Samoa unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 70, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Samoa." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "vanuatu", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 49, "name": "Vanuatu", "suit": "Masks", "score": 69, "lane": "special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/vanuatu.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 69, "networkReach": 70, "updatePriority": 61, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 67, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Vanuatu is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 69/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Vanuatu unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 69, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Vanuatu." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bahrain", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 50, "name": "Bahrain", "suit": "Masks", "score": 68, "lane": "special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/bahrain.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 68, "networkReach": 69, "updatePriority": 60, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 66, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Bahrain is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 68/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Bahrain unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 68, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Bahrain." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "qatar-financial-centre", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 51, "name": "Qatar Financial Centre", "suit": "Masks", "score": 67, "lane": "special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/qatar-financial-centre.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 67, "networkReach": 68, "updatePriority": 59, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 65, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Qatar Financial Centre is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 67/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Qatar Financial Centre unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 67, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Qatar Financial Centre." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "astana-international-financial-centre", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 52, "name": "Astana International Financial Centre", "suit": "Masks", "score": 66, "lane": "special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/astana-international-financial-centre.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 66, "networkReach": 67, "updatePriority": 58, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 64, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Astana International Financial Centre is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 66/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Astana International Financial Centre unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 66, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Astana International Financial Centre." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] } ], "byDeck": { "people-of-interest": [ { "id": "elon-musk", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 1, "name": "Elon Musk", "suit": "Coins", "score": 100, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/elon-musk.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 100, "networkReach": 100, "updatePriority": 100, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 98, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Elon Musk is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 100/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Elon Musk unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 100, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Elon Musk." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "jeff-bezos", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 2, "name": "Jeff Bezos", "suit": "Coins", "score": 100, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/jeff-bezos.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 100, "networkReach": 100, "updatePriority": 100, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 98, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Jeff Bezos is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 100/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Jeff Bezos unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 100, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Jeff Bezos." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "world-health-organization", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 3, "name": "World Health Organization", "suit": "Masks", "score": 100, "lane": "narrative / belief power", "route": "people-of-interest/world-health-organization.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 100, "networkReach": 100, "updatePriority": 100, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 98, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "World Health Organization is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward narrative / belief power. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 100/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for World Health Organization unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 100, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to World Health Organization." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "federal-reserve", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 4, "name": "Federal Reserve", "suit": "Masks", "score": 100, "lane": "narrative / belief power", "route": "people-of-interest/federal-reserve.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 100, "networkReach": 100, "updatePriority": 100, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 98, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Federal Reserve is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward narrative / belief power. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 100/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Federal Reserve unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 100, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Federal Reserve." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "caci-international", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 5, "name": "CACI International", "suit": "Masks", "score": 100, "lane": "narrative / belief power", "route": "people-of-interest/caci-international.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 100, "networkReach": 100, "updatePriority": 100, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 98, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "CACI International is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward narrative / belief power. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 100/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for CACI International unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 100, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to CACI International." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "booz-allen-hamilton", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 6, "name": "Booz Allen Hamilton", "suit": "Masks", "score": 100, "lane": "narrative / belief power", "route": "people-of-interest/booz-allen-hamilton.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 100, "networkReach": 100, "updatePriority": 100, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 98, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Booz Allen Hamilton is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward narrative / belief power. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 100/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Booz Allen Hamilton unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 100, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Booz Allen Hamilton." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "larry-fink", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 7, "name": "Larry Fink", "suit": "Coins", "score": 98, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/larry-fink.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 98, "networkReach": 99, "updatePriority": 98, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 96, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Larry Fink is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 98/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Larry Fink unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 98, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Larry Fink." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "klaus-schwab", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 8, "name": "Klaus Schwab", "suit": "Masks", "score": 94, "lane": "narrative / belief power", "route": "people-of-interest/klaus-schwab.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 94, "networkReach": 95, "updatePriority": 94, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 92, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Klaus Schwab is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward narrative / belief power. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 94/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Klaus Schwab unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 94, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Klaus Schwab." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "emmanuel-macron", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 9, "name": "Emmanuel Macron", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 90, "lane": "governance / state power", "route": "people-of-interest/emmanuel-macron.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 90, "networkReach": 91, "updatePriority": 90, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 88, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Emmanuel Macron is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward governance / state power. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 90/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Emmanuel Macron unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 90, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Emmanuel Macron." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "tony-blair", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 10, "name": "Tony Blair", "suit": "Masks", "score": 88, "lane": "narrative / belief power", "route": "people-of-interest/tony-blair.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 88, "networkReach": 89, "updatePriority": 80, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 86, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Tony Blair is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward narrative / belief power. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 88/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Tony Blair unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 88, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Tony Blair." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "jamie-dimon", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 11, "name": "Jamie Dimon", "suit": "Coins", "score": 85, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/jamie-dimon.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 85, "networkReach": 86, "updatePriority": 77, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 83, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Jamie Dimon is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 85/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Jamie Dimon unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 85, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Jamie Dimon." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "jerome-powell", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 12, "name": "Jerome Powell", "suit": "Coins", "score": 84, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/jerome-powell.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Jerome Powell is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Jerome Powell unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Jerome Powell." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "jensen-huang", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 13, "name": "Jensen Huang", "suit": "Coins", "score": 83, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/jensen-huang.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 83, "networkReach": 84, "updatePriority": 75, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 81, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Jensen Huang is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 83/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Jensen Huang unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 83, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Jensen Huang." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "christine-lagarde", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 14, "name": "Christine Lagarde", "suit": "Coins", "score": 83, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/christine-lagarde.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 83, "networkReach": 84, "updatePriority": 75, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 81, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Christine Lagarde is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 83/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Christine Lagarde unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 83, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Christine Lagarde." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "pope-francis", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 15, "name": "Pope Francis", "suit": "Masks", "score": 82, "lane": "narrative / belief power", "route": "people-of-interest/pope-francis.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Pope Francis is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward narrative / belief power. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Pope Francis unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Pope Francis." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "king-charles-iii", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 16, "name": "King Charles III", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 82, "lane": "governance / state power", "route": "people-of-interest/king-charles-iii.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "King Charles III is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward governance / state power. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for King Charles III unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to King Charles III." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "erik-prince", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 17, "name": "Erik Prince", "suit": "Swords", "score": 81, "lane": "security / contractor power", "route": "people-of-interest/erik-prince.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 81, "networkReach": 82, "updatePriority": 73, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 79, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Erik Prince is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward security / contractor power. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 81/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Erik Prince unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 81, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Erik Prince." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bill-gates", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 18, "name": "Bill Gates", "suit": "Coins", "score": 80, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/bill-gates.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Bill Gates is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Bill Gates unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Bill Gates." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "sam-altman", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 19, "name": "Sam Altman", "suit": "Masks", "score": 80, "lane": "narrative / belief power", "route": "people-of-interest/sam-altman.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Sam Altman is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward narrative / belief power. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Sam Altman unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Sam Altman." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "sundar-pichai", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 20, "name": "Sundar Pichai", "suit": "Masks", "score": 79, "lane": "narrative / belief power", "route": "people-of-interest/sundar-pichai.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 79, "networkReach": 80, "updatePriority": 71, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 77, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Sundar Pichai is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward narrative / belief power. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 79/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Sundar Pichai unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 79, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Sundar Pichai." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "satya-nadella", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 21, "name": "Satya Nadella", "suit": "Masks", "score": 78, "lane": "narrative / belief power", "route": "people-of-interest/satya-nadella.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Satya Nadella is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward narrative / belief power. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Satya Nadella unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Satya Nadella." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "tim-cook", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 22, "name": "Tim Cook", "suit": "Coins", "score": 77, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/tim-cook.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 77, "networkReach": 78, "updatePriority": 69, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 75, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Tim Cook is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 77/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Tim Cook unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 77, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Tim Cook." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "george-soros", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 23, "name": "George Soros", "suit": "Masks", "score": 74, "lane": "narrative / belief power", "route": "people-of-interest/george-soros.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 74, "networkReach": 75, "updatePriority": 66, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 72, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "George Soros is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward narrative / belief power. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 74/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for George Soros unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 74, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to George Soros." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "mukesh-ambani", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 24, "name": "Mukesh Ambani", "suit": "Coins", "score": 72, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/mukesh-ambani.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 72, "networkReach": 73, "updatePriority": 64, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 70, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Mukesh Ambani is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 72/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Mukesh Ambani unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 72, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Mukesh Ambani." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "xi-jinping", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 25, "name": "Xi Jinping", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 72, "lane": "governance / state power", "route": "people-of-interest/xi-jinping.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 72, "networkReach": 73, "updatePriority": 64, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 70, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Xi Jinping is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward governance / state power. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 72/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Xi Jinping unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 72, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Xi Jinping." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "narendra-modi", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 26, "name": "Narendra Modi", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 71, "lane": "governance / state power", "route": "people-of-interest/narendra-modi.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 71, "networkReach": 72, "updatePriority": 63, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 69, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Narendra Modi is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward governance / state power. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 71/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Narendra Modi unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 71, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Narendra Modi." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "vladimir-putin", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 27, "name": "Vladimir Putin", "suit": "Swords", "score": 71, "lane": "security / contractor power", "route": "people-of-interest/vladimir-putin.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 71, "networkReach": 72, "updatePriority": 63, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 69, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Vladimir Putin is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward security / contractor power. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 71/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Vladimir Putin unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 71, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Vladimir Putin." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "benjamin-netanyahu", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 28, "name": "Benjamin Netanyahu", "suit": "Swords", "score": 70, "lane": "security / contractor power", "route": "people-of-interest/benjamin-netanyahu.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 70, "networkReach": 71, "updatePriority": 62, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 68, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Benjamin Netanyahu is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward security / contractor power. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 70/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Benjamin Netanyahu unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 70, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Benjamin Netanyahu." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "volodymyr-zelenskyy", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 29, "name": "Volodymyr Zelenskyy", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 69, "lane": "governance / state power", "route": "people-of-interest/volodymyr-zelenskyy.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 69, "networkReach": 70, "updatePriority": 61, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 67, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Volodymyr Zelenskyy is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward governance / state power. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 69/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Volodymyr Zelenskyy unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 69, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Volodymyr Zelenskyy." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "giorgia-meloni", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 30, "name": "Giorgia Meloni", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 68, "lane": "governance / state power", "route": "people-of-interest/giorgia-meloni.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 68, "networkReach": 69, "updatePriority": 60, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 66, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Giorgia Meloni is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward governance / state power. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 68/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Giorgia Meloni unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 68, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Giorgia Meloni." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "gautam-adani", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 31, "name": "Gautam Adani", "suit": "Coins", "score": 67, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/gautam-adani.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 67, "networkReach": 68, "updatePriority": 59, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 65, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Gautam Adani is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 67/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Gautam Adani unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 67, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Gautam Adani." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "ray-dalio", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 32, "name": "Ray Dalio", "suit": "Coins", "score": 66, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/ray-dalio.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 66, "networkReach": 67, "updatePriority": 58, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 64, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Ray Dalio is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 66/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Ray Dalio unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 66, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Ray Dalio." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "brian-moynihan", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 33, "name": "Brian Moynihan", "suit": "Coins", "score": 65, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/brian-moynihan.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 65, "networkReach": 66, "updatePriority": 57, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 63, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Brian Moynihan is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 65/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Brian Moynihan unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 65, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Brian Moynihan." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "david-solomon", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 34, "name": "David Solomon", "suit": "Coins", "score": 65, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/david-solomon.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 65, "networkReach": 66, "updatePriority": 57, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 63, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "David Solomon is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 65/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for David Solomon unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 65, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to David Solomon." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "jane-fraser", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 35, "name": "Jane Fraser", "suit": "Coins", "score": 65, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/jane-fraser.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 65, "networkReach": 66, "updatePriority": 57, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 63, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Jane Fraser is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 65/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Jane Fraser unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 65, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Jane Fraser." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "ajay-banga", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 36, "name": "Ajay Banga", "suit": "Coins", "score": 65, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/ajay-banga.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 65, "networkReach": 66, "updatePriority": 57, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 63, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Ajay Banga is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 65/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Ajay Banga unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 65, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Ajay Banga." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "kristalina-georgieva", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 37, "name": "Kristalina Georgieva", "suit": "Coins", "score": 65, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/kristalina-georgieva.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 65, "networkReach": 66, "updatePriority": 57, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 63, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Kristalina Georgieva is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 65/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Kristalina Georgieva unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 65, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Kristalina Georgieva." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "tedros-adhanom-ghebreyesus", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 38, "name": "Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus", "suit": "Masks", "score": 65, "lane": "narrative / belief power", "route": "people-of-interest/tedros-adhanom-ghebreyesus.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 65, "networkReach": 66, "updatePriority": 57, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 63, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward narrative / belief power. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 65/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 65, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "ant-nio-guterres", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 39, "name": "António Guterres", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 65, "lane": "governance / state power", "route": "people-of-interest/ant-nio-guterres.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 65, "networkReach": 66, "updatePriority": 57, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 63, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "António Guterres is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward governance / state power. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 65/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for António Guterres unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 65, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to António Guterres." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "mark-rutte", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 40, "name": "Mark Rutte", "suit": "Swords", "score": 64, "lane": "security / contractor power", "route": "people-of-interest/mark-rutte.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 64, "networkReach": 65, "updatePriority": 56, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 62, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Mark Rutte is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward security / contractor power. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 64/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Mark Rutte unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 64, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Mark Rutte." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "jens-stoltenberg", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 41, "name": "Jens Stoltenberg", "suit": "Swords", "score": 63, "lane": "security / contractor power", "route": "people-of-interest/jens-stoltenberg.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 63, "networkReach": 64, "updatePriority": 55, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 61, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Jens Stoltenberg is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward security / contractor power. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 63/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Jens Stoltenberg unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 63, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Jens Stoltenberg." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "alex-karp", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 42, "name": "Alex Karp", "suit": "Swords", "score": 63, "lane": "security / contractor power", "route": "people-of-interest/alex-karp.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 63, "networkReach": 64, "updatePriority": 55, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 61, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Alex Karp is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward security / contractor power. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 63/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Alex Karp unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 63, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Alex Karp." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "miriam-adelson", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 43, "name": "Miriam Adelson", "suit": "Coins", "score": 62, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/miriam-adelson.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 62, "networkReach": 63, "updatePriority": 54, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 60, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Miriam Adelson is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 62/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Miriam Adelson unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 62, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Miriam Adelson." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "rupert-murdoch", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 44, "name": "Rupert Murdoch", "suit": "Masks", "score": 62, "lane": "narrative / belief power", "route": "people-of-interest/rupert-murdoch.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 62, "networkReach": 63, "updatePriority": 54, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 60, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Rupert Murdoch is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward narrative / belief power. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 62/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Rupert Murdoch unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 62, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Rupert Murdoch." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "laurene-powell-jobs", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 45, "name": "Laurene Powell Jobs", "suit": "Masks", "score": 61, "lane": "narrative / belief power", "route": "people-of-interest/laurene-powell-jobs.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 61, "networkReach": 62, "updatePriority": 53, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 59, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Laurene Powell Jobs is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward narrative / belief power. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 61/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Laurene Powell Jobs unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 61, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Laurene Powell Jobs." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "mark-zuckerberg", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 46, "name": "Mark Zuckerberg", "suit": "Coins", "score": 60, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/mark-zuckerberg.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 60, "networkReach": 61, "updatePriority": 52, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 58, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Mark Zuckerberg is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 60/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Mark Zuckerberg unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 60, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Mark Zuckerberg." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "larry-ellison", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 47, "name": "Larry Ellison", "suit": "Coins", "score": 60, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/larry-ellison.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 60, "networkReach": 61, "updatePriority": 52, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 58, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Larry Ellison is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 60/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Larry Ellison unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 60, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Larry Ellison." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "peter-thiel", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 48, "name": "Peter Thiel", "suit": "Coins", "score": 60, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/peter-thiel.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 60, "networkReach": 61, "updatePriority": 52, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 58, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Peter Thiel is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 60/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Peter Thiel unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 60, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Peter Thiel." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "michael-bloomberg", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 49, "name": "Michael Bloomberg", "suit": "Coins", "score": 60, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/michael-bloomberg.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 60, "networkReach": 61, "updatePriority": 52, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 58, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Michael Bloomberg is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 60/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Michael Bloomberg unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 60, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Michael Bloomberg." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "warren-buffett", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 50, "name": "Warren Buffett", "suit": "Coins", "score": 60, "lane": "money / ownership power", "route": "people-of-interest/warren-buffett.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 60, "networkReach": 61, "updatePriority": 52, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 58, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Warren Buffett is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward money / ownership power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 60/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Warren Buffett unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 60, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Warren Buffett." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "mackenzie-scott", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 51, "name": "MacKenzie Scott", "suit": "Masks", "score": 60, "lane": "narrative / belief power", "route": "people-of-interest/mackenzie-scott.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 60, "networkReach": 61, "updatePriority": 52, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 58, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "MacKenzie Scott is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward narrative / belief power. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 60/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for MacKenzie Scott unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 60, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to MacKenzie Scott." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "priscilla-chan", "deckId": "people-of-interest", "deckTitle": "Top 52 Persons of Interest", "rank": 52, "name": "Priscilla Chan", "suit": "Masks", "score": 60, "lane": "narrative / belief power", "route": "people-of-interest/priscilla-chan.html", "sourceFile": "data/top-52-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 60, "networkReach": 61, "updatePriority": 52, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 58, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Priscilla Chan is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the people-of-interest deck. The card points readers toward narrative / belief power. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 60/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Priscilla Chan unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 60, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Priscilla Chan." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] } ], "controlled-opposition": [ { "id": "alex-jones", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 1, "name": "Alex Jones", "suit": "Masks", "score": 96, "lane": "conspiracy media / outrage engine", "route": "controlled-opposition/alex-jones.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 96, "networkReach": 97, "updatePriority": 96, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 94, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Alex Jones is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward conspiracy media / outrage engine. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 96/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Alex Jones unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 96, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Alex Jones." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "andrew-tate", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 2, "name": "Andrew Tate", "suit": "Coins", "score": 94, "lane": "manosphere / masculinity culture-war", "route": "controlled-opposition/andrew-tate.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 94, "networkReach": 95, "updatePriority": 94, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 92, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Andrew Tate is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward manosphere / masculinity culture-war. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 94/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Andrew Tate unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 94, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Andrew Tate." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "mark-sargent", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 3, "name": "Mark Sargent", "suit": "Mirrors", "score": 72, "lane": "flat earth / cosmology opposition", "route": "controlled-opposition/mark-sargent.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 72, "networkReach": 73, "updatePriority": 64, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 70, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Mark Sargent is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward flat earth / cosmology opposition. The Mirrors suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 72/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Mark Sargent unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 72, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Mark Sargent." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "david-icke", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 4, "name": "David Icke", "suit": "Mirrors", "score": 90, "lane": "conspiracy / spiritual politics", "route": "controlled-opposition/david-icke.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 90, "networkReach": 91, "updatePriority": 90, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 88, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "David Icke is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward conspiracy / spiritual politics. The Mirrors suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 90/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for David Icke unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 90, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to David Icke." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "russell-brand", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 5, "name": "Russell Brand", "suit": "Masks", "score": 88, "lane": "alternative media / spiritual populism", "route": "controlled-opposition/russell-brand.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 88, "networkReach": 89, "updatePriority": 80, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 86, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Russell Brand is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward alternative media / spiritual populism. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 88/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Russell Brand unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 88, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Russell Brand." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "joe-rogan", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 6, "name": "Joe Rogan", "suit": "Masks", "score": 92, "lane": "platform gate / open debate hub", "route": "controlled-opposition/joe-rogan.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 92, "networkReach": 93, "updatePriority": 92, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 90, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Joe Rogan is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward platform gate / open debate hub. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 92/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Joe Rogan unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 92, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Joe Rogan." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "tucker-carlson", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 7, "name": "Tucker Carlson", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 91, "lane": "mainstream-to-alt media bridge", "route": "controlled-opposition/tucker-carlson.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 91, "networkReach": 92, "updatePriority": 91, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 89, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Tucker Carlson is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward mainstream-to-alt media bridge. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 91/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Tucker Carlson unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 91, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Tucker Carlson." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "candace-owens", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 8, "name": "Candace Owens", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 82, "lane": "culture-war opposition", "route": "controlled-opposition/candace-owens.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Candace Owens is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward culture-war opposition. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Candace Owens unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Candace Owens." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "jordan-peterson", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 9, "name": "Jordan Peterson", "suit": "Mirrors", "score": 85, "lane": "intellectual opposition / psychology", "route": "controlled-opposition/jordan-peterson.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 85, "networkReach": 86, "updatePriority": 77, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 83, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Jordan Peterson is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward intellectual opposition / psychology. The Mirrors suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 85/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Jordan Peterson unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 85, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Jordan Peterson." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "ben-shapiro", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 10, "name": "Ben Shapiro", "suit": "Masks", "score": 84, "lane": "conservative opposition gate", "route": "controlled-opposition/ben-shapiro.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Ben Shapiro is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward conservative opposition gate. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Ben Shapiro unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Ben Shapiro." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "tim-pool", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 11, "name": "Tim Pool", "suit": "Masks", "score": 80, "lane": "independent media / civil-war narrative", "route": "controlled-opposition/tim-pool.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Tim Pool is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward independent media / civil-war narrative. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Tim Pool unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Tim Pool." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "steven-crowder", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 12, "name": "Steven Crowder", "suit": "Masks", "score": 76, "lane": "conservative media outrage", "route": "controlled-opposition/steven-crowder.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 76, "networkReach": 77, "updatePriority": 68, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 74, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Steven Crowder is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward conservative media outrage. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 76/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Steven Crowder unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 76, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Steven Crowder." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "charlie-kirk", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 13, "name": "Charlie Kirk", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 78, "lane": "youth politics / activist machine", "route": "controlled-opposition/charlie-kirk.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Charlie Kirk is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward youth politics / activist machine. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Charlie Kirk unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Charlie Kirk." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "matt-walsh", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 14, "name": "Matt Walsh", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 74, "lane": "culture-war moral gate", "route": "controlled-opposition/matt-walsh.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 74, "networkReach": 75, "updatePriority": 66, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 72, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Matt Walsh is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward culture-war moral gate. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 74/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Matt Walsh unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 74, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Matt Walsh." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "glenn-beck", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 15, "name": "Glenn Beck", "suit": "Masks", "score": 77, "lane": "legacy conspiracy-right bridge", "route": "controlled-opposition/glenn-beck.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 77, "networkReach": 78, "updatePriority": 69, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 75, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Glenn Beck is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward legacy conspiracy-right bridge. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 77/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Glenn Beck unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 77, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Glenn Beck." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "piers-morgan", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 16, "name": "Piers Morgan", "suit": "Masks", "score": 75, "lane": "mainstream debate gate", "route": "controlled-opposition/piers-morgan.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 75, "networkReach": 76, "updatePriority": 67, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 73, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Piers Morgan is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward mainstream debate gate. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 75/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Piers Morgan unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 75, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Piers Morgan." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "elon-musk", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 17, "name": "Elon Musk", "suit": "Coins", "score": 100, "lane": "free-speech platform paradox", "route": "controlled-opposition/elon-musk.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 100, "networkReach": 100, "updatePriority": 100, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 98, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Elon Musk is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward free-speech platform paradox. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 100/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Elon Musk unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 100, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Elon Musk." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "kanye-west-ye", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 18, "name": "Kanye West / Ye", "suit": "Masks", "score": 79, "lane": "celebrity disruption / symbolic opposition", "route": "controlled-opposition/kanye-west-ye.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 79, "networkReach": 80, "updatePriority": 71, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 77, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Kanye West / Ye is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward celebrity disruption / symbolic opposition. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 79/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Kanye West / Ye unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 79, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Kanye West / Ye." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "rfk-jr", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 19, "name": "RFK Jr.", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 89, "lane": "vaccine/state-health opposition", "route": "controlled-opposition/rfk-jr.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 89, "networkReach": 90, "updatePriority": 89, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 87, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "RFK Jr. is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward vaccine/state-health opposition. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 89/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for RFK Jr. unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 89, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to RFK Jr.." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "tulsi-gabbard", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 20, "name": "Tulsi Gabbard", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 81, "lane": "anti-war/state-security crossover", "route": "controlled-opposition/tulsi-gabbard.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 81, "networkReach": 82, "updatePriority": 73, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 79, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Tulsi Gabbard is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward anti-war/state-security crossover. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 81/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Tulsi Gabbard unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 81, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Tulsi Gabbard." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "vivek-ramaswamy", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 21, "name": "Vivek Ramaswamy", "suit": "Coins", "score": 78, "lane": "anti-woke corporate-politics crossover", "route": "controlled-opposition/vivek-ramaswamy.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Vivek Ramaswamy is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward anti-woke corporate-politics crossover. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Vivek Ramaswamy unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Vivek Ramaswamy." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "nigel-farage", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 22, "name": "Nigel Farage", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 82, "lane": "populist Brexit/media opposition", "route": "controlled-opposition/nigel-farage.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Nigel Farage is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward populist Brexit/media opposition. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Nigel Farage unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Nigel Farage." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "marine-le-pen", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 23, "name": "Marine Le Pen", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 78, "lane": "nationalist opposition gate", "route": "controlled-opposition/marine-le-pen.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Marine Le Pen is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward nationalist opposition gate. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Marine Le Pen unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Marine Le Pen." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "geert-wilders", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 24, "name": "Geert Wilders", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 76, "lane": "European populist opposition", "route": "controlled-opposition/geert-wilders.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 76, "networkReach": 77, "updatePriority": 68, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 74, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Geert Wilders is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward European populist opposition. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 76/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Geert Wilders unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 76, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Geert Wilders." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "javier-milei", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 25, "name": "Javier Milei", "suit": "Coins", "score": 80, "lane": "libertarian shock opposition", "route": "controlled-opposition/javier-milei.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Javier Milei is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward libertarian shock opposition. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Javier Milei unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Javier Milei." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "steve-bannon", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 26, "name": "Steve Bannon", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 86, "lane": "populist strategy / movement architect", "route": "controlled-opposition/steve-bannon.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 86, "networkReach": 87, "updatePriority": 78, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 84, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Steve Bannon is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward populist strategy / movement architect. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 86/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Steve Bannon unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 86, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Steve Bannon." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "roger-stone", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 27, "name": "Roger Stone", "suit": "Masks", "score": 77, "lane": "political dark-arts operator", "route": "controlled-opposition/roger-stone.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 77, "networkReach": 78, "updatePriority": 69, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 75, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Roger Stone is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward political dark-arts operator. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 77/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Roger Stone unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 77, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Roger Stone." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "milo-yiannopoulos", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 28, "name": "Milo Yiannopoulos", "suit": "Masks", "score": 68, "lane": "provocation/media disruption", "route": "controlled-opposition/milo-yiannopoulos.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 68, "networkReach": 69, "updatePriority": 60, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 66, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Milo Yiannopoulos is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward provocation/media disruption. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 68/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Milo Yiannopoulos unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 68, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Milo Yiannopoulos." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "nick-fuentes", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 29, "name": "Nick Fuentes", "suit": "Mirrors", "score": 70, "lane": "extremist edge / movement contamination risk", "route": "controlled-opposition/nick-fuentes.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 70, "networkReach": 71, "updatePriority": 62, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 68, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Nick Fuentes is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward extremist edge / movement contamination risk. The Mirrors suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 70/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Nick Fuentes unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 70, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Nick Fuentes." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "gavin-mcinnes", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 30, "name": "Gavin McInnes", "suit": "Masks", "score": 69, "lane": "alt-right/media provocation", "route": "controlled-opposition/gavin-mcinnes.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 69, "networkReach": 70, "updatePriority": 61, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 67, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Gavin McInnes is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward alt-right/media provocation. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 69/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Gavin McInnes unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 69, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Gavin McInnes." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "laura-loomer", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 31, "name": "Laura Loomer", "suit": "Masks", "score": 70, "lane": "outrage activism / censorship martyrdom", "route": "controlled-opposition/laura-loomer.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 70, "networkReach": 71, "updatePriority": 62, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 68, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Laura Loomer is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward outrage activism / censorship martyrdom. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 70/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Laura Loomer unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 70, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Laura Loomer." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "mike-cernovich", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 32, "name": "Mike Cernovich", "suit": "Mirrors", "score": 67, "lane": "Pizzagate-era online influence", "route": "controlled-opposition/mike-cernovich.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 67, "networkReach": 68, "updatePriority": 59, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 65, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Mike Cernovich is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward Pizzagate-era online influence. The Mirrors suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 67/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Mike Cernovich unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 67, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Mike Cernovich." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "jack-posobiec", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 33, "name": "Jack Posobiec", "suit": "Masks", "score": 73, "lane": "narrative warfare / online right", "route": "controlled-opposition/jack-posobiec.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 73, "networkReach": 74, "updatePriority": 65, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 71, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Jack Posobiec is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward narrative warfare / online right. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 73/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Jack Posobiec unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 73, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Jack Posobiec." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "james-o-keefe", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 34, "name": "James O'Keefe", "suit": "Masks", "score": 75, "lane": "undercover media opposition", "route": "controlled-opposition/james-o-keefe.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 75, "networkReach": 76, "updatePriority": 67, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 73, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "James O'Keefe is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward undercover media opposition. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 75/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for James O'Keefe unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 75, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to James O'Keefe." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "project-veritas-network", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 35, "name": "Project Veritas network", "suit": "Masks", "score": 74, "lane": "opposition media machine", "route": "controlled-opposition/project-veritas-network.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 74, "networkReach": 75, "updatePriority": 66, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 72, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Project Veritas network is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward opposition media machine. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 74/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Project Veritas network unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 74, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Project Veritas network." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "naomi-wolf", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 36, "name": "Naomi Wolf", "suit": "Mirrors", "score": 72, "lane": "liberal-to-alt-media dissent", "route": "controlled-opposition/naomi-wolf.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 72, "networkReach": 73, "updatePriority": 64, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 70, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Naomi Wolf is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward liberal-to-alt-media dissent. The Mirrors suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 72/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Naomi Wolf unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 72, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Naomi Wolf." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bret-weinstein", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 37, "name": "Bret Weinstein", "suit": "Mirrors", "score": 76, "lane": "COVID/lab-leak/intellectual dissent", "route": "controlled-opposition/bret-weinstein.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 76, "networkReach": 77, "updatePriority": 68, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 74, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Bret Weinstein is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward COVID/lab-leak/intellectual dissent. The Mirrors suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 76/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Bret Weinstein unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 76, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Bret Weinstein." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "heather-heying", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 38, "name": "Heather Heying", "suit": "Mirrors", "score": 68, "lane": "science dissent network", "route": "controlled-opposition/heather-heying.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 68, "networkReach": 69, "updatePriority": 60, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 66, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Heather Heying is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward science dissent network. The Mirrors suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 68/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Heather Heying unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 68, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Heather Heying." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "del-bigtree", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 39, "name": "Del Bigtree", "suit": "Mirrors", "score": 74, "lane": "vaccine opposition media", "route": "controlled-opposition/del-bigtree.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 74, "networkReach": 75, "updatePriority": 66, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 72, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Del Bigtree is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward vaccine opposition media. The Mirrors suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 74/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Del Bigtree unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 74, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Del Bigtree." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "robert-malone", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 40, "name": "Robert Malone", "suit": "Mirrors", "score": 79, "lane": "COVID-vaccine opposition", "route": "controlled-opposition/robert-malone.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 79, "networkReach": 80, "updatePriority": 71, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 77, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Robert Malone is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward COVID-vaccine opposition. The Mirrors suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 79/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Robert Malone unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 79, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Robert Malone." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "peter-mccullough", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 41, "name": "Peter McCullough", "suit": "Mirrors", "score": 78, "lane": "COVID-medical dissent", "route": "controlled-opposition/peter-mccullough.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Peter McCullough is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward COVID-medical dissent. The Mirrors suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Peter McCullough unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Peter McCullough." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "sherri-tenpenny", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 42, "name": "Sherri Tenpenny", "suit": "Mirrors", "score": 66, "lane": "vaccine-conspiracy lane", "route": "controlled-opposition/sherri-tenpenny.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 66, "networkReach": 67, "updatePriority": 58, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 64, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Sherri Tenpenny is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward vaccine-conspiracy lane. The Mirrors suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 66/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Sherri Tenpenny unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 66, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Sherri Tenpenny." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "kate-shemirani", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 43, "name": "Kate Shemirani", "suit": "Mirrors", "score": 64, "lane": "anti-vax protest split lane", "route": "controlled-opposition/kate-shemirani.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 64, "networkReach": 65, "updatePriority": 56, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 62, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Kate Shemirani is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward anti-vax protest split lane. The Mirrors suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 64/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Kate Shemirani unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 64, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Kate Shemirani." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "mark-steele", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 44, "name": "Mark Steele", "suit": "Mirrors", "score": 63, "lane": "5G / protest split lane", "route": "controlled-opposition/mark-steele.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 63, "networkReach": 64, "updatePriority": 55, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 61, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Mark Steele is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward 5G / protest split lane. The Mirrors suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 63/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Mark Steele unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 63, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Mark Steele." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "piers-corbyn", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 45, "name": "Piers Corbyn", "suit": "Mirrors", "score": 67, "lane": "climate/COVID protest opposition", "route": "controlled-opposition/piers-corbyn.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 67, "networkReach": 68, "updatePriority": 59, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 65, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Piers Corbyn is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward climate/COVID protest opposition. The Mirrors suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 67/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Piers Corbyn unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 67, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Piers Corbyn." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "max-blumenthal", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 46, "name": "Max Blumenthal", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 73, "lane": "anti-war / geopolitical dissent", "route": "controlled-opposition/max-blumenthal.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 73, "networkReach": 74, "updatePriority": 65, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 71, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Max Blumenthal is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward anti-war / geopolitical dissent. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 73/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Max Blumenthal unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 73, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Max Blumenthal." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "jimmy-dore", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 47, "name": "Jimmy Dore", "suit": "Masks", "score": 72, "lane": "left anti-establishment media", "route": "controlled-opposition/jimmy-dore.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 72, "networkReach": 73, "updatePriority": 64, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 70, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Jimmy Dore is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward left anti-establishment media. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 72/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Jimmy Dore unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 72, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Jimmy Dore." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "glenn-greenwald", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 48, "name": "Glenn Greenwald", "suit": "Masks", "score": 76, "lane": "civil-liberties / anti-security-state media", "route": "controlled-opposition/glenn-greenwald.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 76, "networkReach": 77, "updatePriority": 68, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 74, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Glenn Greenwald is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward civil-liberties / anti-security-state media. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 76/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Glenn Greenwald unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 76, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Glenn Greenwald." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "matt-taibbi", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 49, "name": "Matt Taibbi", "suit": "Masks", "score": 74, "lane": "censorship / establishment-media critic", "route": "controlled-opposition/matt-taibbi.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 74, "networkReach": 75, "updatePriority": 66, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 72, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Matt Taibbi is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward censorship / establishment-media critic. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 74/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Matt Taibbi unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 74, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Matt Taibbi." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "julian-assange", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 50, "name": "Julian Assange", "suit": "Mirrors", "score": 90, "lane": "disclosure / information-war symbol", "route": "controlled-opposition/julian-assange.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 90, "networkReach": 91, "updatePriority": 90, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 88, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Julian Assange is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward disclosure / information-war symbol. The Mirrors suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 90/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Julian Assange unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 90, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Julian Assange." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "edward-snowden", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 51, "name": "Edward Snowden", "suit": "Mirrors", "score": 88, "lane": "surveillance-state opposition symbol", "route": "controlled-opposition/edward-snowden.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 88, "networkReach": 89, "updatePriority": 80, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 86, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Edward Snowden is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward surveillance-state opposition symbol. The Mirrors suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 88/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Edward Snowden unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 88, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Edward Snowden." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "graham-hancock", "deckId": "controlled-opposition", "deckTitle": "Controlled Opposition Deck", "rank": 52, "name": "Graham Hancock", "suit": "Mirrors", "score": 70, "lane": "ancient-history opposition / soft disclosure", "route": "controlled-opposition/graham-hancock.html", "sourceFile": "data/controlled-opposition-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 70, "networkReach": 71, "updatePriority": 62, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 68, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Graham Hancock is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the controlled-opposition deck. The card points readers toward ancient-history opposition / soft disclosure. The Mirrors suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 70/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Graham Hancock unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 70, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Graham Hancock." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] } ], "institutions": [ { "id": "world-economic-forum", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 1, "name": "World Economic Forum", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 100, "lane": "public-private governance, stakeholder capitalism, digital transformation and global policy coordination", "route": "institution-briefs/world-economic-forum.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 100, "networkReach": 100, "updatePriority": 100, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 98, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "World Economic Forum is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward public-private governance, stakeholder capitalism, digital transformation and global policy coordination. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 100/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for World Economic Forum unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 100, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to World Economic Forum." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "united-nations", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 2, "name": "United Nations", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 99, "lane": "Agenda 2030, SDGs, global governance framework and international coordination", "route": "power-atlas.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 99, "networkReach": 100, "updatePriority": 99, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 97, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "United Nations is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward Agenda 2030, SDGs, global governance framework and international coordination. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 99/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for United Nations unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 99, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to United Nations." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "world-health-organization", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 3, "name": "World Health Organization", "suit": "Serpents", "score": 98, "lane": "global health governance, pandemic policy, health emergency coordination and biosecurity relevance", "route": "institution-briefs/world-health-organization.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 98, "networkReach": 99, "updatePriority": 98, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 96, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "World Health Organization is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward global health governance, pandemic policy, health emergency coordination and biosecurity relevance. The Serpents suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 98/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for World Health Organization unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 98, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to World Health Organization." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bank-for-international-settlements", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 4, "name": "Bank for International Settlements", "suit": "Coins", "score": 97, "lane": "central-bank coordination, monetary architecture and CBDC policy relevance", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 97, "networkReach": 98, "updatePriority": 97, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 95, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Bank for International Settlements is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward central-bank coordination, monetary architecture and CBDC policy relevance. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 97/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Bank for International Settlements unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 97, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Bank for International Settlements." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "blackrock", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 5, "name": "BlackRock", "suit": "Coins", "score": 96, "lane": "asset management, ownership influence, ESG routes and institutional capital power", "route": "big-three/blackrock.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 96, "networkReach": 97, "updatePriority": 96, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 94, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "BlackRock is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward asset management, ownership influence, ESG routes and institutional capital power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 96/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for BlackRock unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 96, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to BlackRock." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "vanguard", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 6, "name": "Vanguard", "suit": "Coins", "score": 95, "lane": "asset management, index ownership and capital concentration route", "route": "big-three/vanguard.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 95, "networkReach": 96, "updatePriority": 95, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 93, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Vanguard is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward asset management, index ownership and capital concentration route. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 95/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Vanguard unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 95, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Vanguard." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "state-street", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 7, "name": "State Street", "suit": "Coins", "score": 94, "lane": "asset management, custody infrastructure and index ownership route", "route": "big-three/state-street.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 94, "networkReach": 95, "updatePriority": 94, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 92, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "State Street is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward asset management, custody infrastructure and index ownership route. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 94/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for State Street unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 94, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to State Street." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "international-monetary-fund", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 8, "name": "International Monetary Fund", "suit": "Coins", "score": 94, "lane": "global finance, debt systems, policy conditionality and monetary governance", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 94, "networkReach": 95, "updatePriority": 94, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 92, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "International Monetary Fund is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward global finance, debt systems, policy conditionality and monetary governance. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 94/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for International Monetary Fund unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 94, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to International Monetary Fund." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "world-bank", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 9, "name": "World Bank", "suit": "Coins", "score": 93, "lane": "development finance, digital public infrastructure and global policy funding routes", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 93, "networkReach": 94, "updatePriority": 93, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 91, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "World Bank is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward development finance, digital public infrastructure and global policy funding routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 93/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for World Bank unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 93, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to World Bank." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "federal-reserve-system", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 10, "name": "Federal Reserve System", "suit": "Coins", "score": 93, "lane": "central banking, monetary policy, payment rails and financial-system influence", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 93, "networkReach": 94, "updatePriority": 93, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 91, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Federal Reserve System is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward central banking, monetary policy, payment rails and financial-system influence. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 93/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Federal Reserve System unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 93, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Federal Reserve System." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "european-central-bank", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 11, "name": "European Central Bank", "suit": "Coins", "score": 91, "lane": "eurozone central banking, digital euro and monetary governance route", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 91, "networkReach": 92, "updatePriority": 91, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 89, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "European Central Bank is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward eurozone central banking, digital euro and monetary governance route. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 91/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for European Central Bank unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 91, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to European Central Bank." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "european-commission", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 12, "name": "European Commission", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 91, "lane": "EU regulation, digital identity policy, platform rules and Agenda-linked governance", "route": "power-structure-map.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 91, "networkReach": 92, "updatePriority": 91, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 89, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "European Commission is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward EU regulation, digital identity policy, platform rules and Agenda-linked governance. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 91/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for European Commission unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 91, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to European Commission." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "world-trade-organization", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 13, "name": "World Trade Organization", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 88, "lane": "trade governance, global standards and economic-policy coordination", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 88, "networkReach": 89, "updatePriority": 80, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 86, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "World Trade Organization is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward trade governance, global standards and economic-policy coordination. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 88/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for World Trade Organization unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 88, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to World Trade Organization." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "organisation-for-economic-co-operation-and-development", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 14, "name": "Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 88, "lane": "policy standards, taxation, governance metrics and digital-government influence", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 88, "networkReach": 89, "updatePriority": 80, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 86, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward policy standards, taxation, governance metrics and digital-government influence. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 88/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 88, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "g20", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 15, "name": "G20", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 87, "lane": "global policy coordination across finance, health, climate, digital economy and security", "route": "power-structure-map.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 87, "networkReach": 88, "updatePriority": 79, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 85, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "G20 is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward global policy coordination across finance, health, climate, digital economy and security. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 87/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for G20 unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 87, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to G20." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "g7", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 16, "name": "G7", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 86, "lane": "advanced-economy policy coordination, sanctions, AI, climate and security alignment", "route": "power-structure-map.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 86, "networkReach": 87, "updatePriority": 78, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 84, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "G7 is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward advanced-economy policy coordination, sanctions, AI, climate and security alignment. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 86/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for G7 unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 86, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to G7." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "microsoft", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 17, "name": "Microsoft", "suit": "Keys", "score": 90, "lane": "cloud, AI, identity infrastructure, government contracts and digital operating systems", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 90, "networkReach": 91, "updatePriority": 90, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 88, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Microsoft is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward cloud, AI, identity infrastructure, government contracts and digital operating systems. The Keys suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 90/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Microsoft unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 90, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Microsoft." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "google", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 18, "name": "Google", "suit": "Keys", "score": 90, "lane": "search, AI, data infrastructure, Android, ads and information access", "route": "answer-engine.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 90, "networkReach": 91, "updatePriority": 90, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 88, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Google is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward search, AI, data infrastructure, Android, ads and information access. The Keys suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 90/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Google unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 90, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Google." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "apple", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 19, "name": "Apple", "suit": "Keys", "score": 86, "lane": "device identity, biometric hardware, platform control and privacy infrastructure", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 86, "networkReach": 87, "updatePriority": 78, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 84, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Apple is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward device identity, biometric hardware, platform control and privacy infrastructure. The Keys suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 86/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Apple unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 86, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Apple." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "meta-platforms", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 20, "name": "Meta Platforms", "suit": "Masks", "score": 86, "lane": "social graph, identity systems, narrative flow, VR and platform moderation", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 86, "networkReach": 87, "updatePriority": 78, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 84, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Meta Platforms is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward social graph, identity systems, narrative flow, VR and platform moderation. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 86/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Meta Platforms unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 86, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Meta Platforms." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "amazon", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 21, "name": "Amazon", "suit": "Keys", "score": 85, "lane": "cloud infrastructure, logistics, surveillance-adjacent systems and platform power", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 85, "networkReach": 86, "updatePriority": 77, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 83, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Amazon is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward cloud infrastructure, logistics, surveillance-adjacent systems and platform power. The Keys suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 85/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Amazon unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 85, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Amazon." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "oracle", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 22, "name": "Oracle", "suit": "Keys", "score": 84, "lane": "databases, cloud, enterprise identity, health records and government systems", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Oracle is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward databases, cloud, enterprise identity, health records and government systems. The Keys suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Oracle unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Oracle." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "palantir-technologies", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 23, "name": "Palantir Technologies", "suit": "Swords", "score": 89, "lane": "data fusion, intelligence analytics, defense, health and government systems", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 89, "networkReach": 90, "updatePriority": 89, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 87, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Palantir Technologies is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward data fusion, intelligence analytics, defense, health and government systems. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 89/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Palantir Technologies unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 89, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Palantir Technologies." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "openai", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 24, "name": "OpenAI", "suit": "Keys", "score": 84, "lane": "AI governance, model infrastructure, information mediation and policy influence", "route": "answer-engine.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "OpenAI is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward AI governance, model infrastructure, information mediation and policy influence. The Keys suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for OpenAI unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to OpenAI." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "central-intelligence-agency", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 25, "name": "Central Intelligence Agency", "suit": "Swords", "score": 90, "lane": "intelligence history, covert action, information operations and security-state route", "route": "evidence-vault.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 90, "networkReach": 91, "updatePriority": 90, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 88, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Central Intelligence Agency is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward intelligence history, covert action, information operations and security-state route. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 90/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Central Intelligence Agency unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 90, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Central Intelligence Agency." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "national-security-agency", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 26, "name": "National Security Agency", "suit": "Swords", "score": 89, "lane": "signals intelligence, surveillance architecture and cyber capability route", "route": "evidence-vault.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 89, "networkReach": 90, "updatePriority": 89, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 87, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "National Security Agency is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward signals intelligence, surveillance architecture and cyber capability route. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 89/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for National Security Agency unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 89, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to National Security Agency." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "federal-bureau-of-investigation", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 27, "name": "Federal Bureau of Investigation", "suit": "Swords", "score": 84, "lane": "domestic security, investigations, platform liaison and legal-security interface", "route": "evidence-vault.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Federal Bureau of Investigation is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward domestic security, investigations, platform liaison and legal-security interface. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Federal Bureau of Investigation unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Federal Bureau of Investigation." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "gchq", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 28, "name": "GCHQ", "suit": "Swords", "score": 84, "lane": "signals intelligence, cyber security and Five Eyes infrastructure", "route": "evidence-vault.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "GCHQ is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward signals intelligence, cyber security and Five Eyes infrastructure. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for GCHQ unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to GCHQ." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "mi6", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 29, "name": "MI6", "suit": "Swords", "score": 82, "lane": "foreign intelligence, diplomacy-security crossover and historical operations route", "route": "evidence-vault.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "MI6 is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward foreign intelligence, diplomacy-security crossover and historical operations route. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for MI6 unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to MI6." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "nato", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 30, "name": "NATO", "suit": "Swords", "score": 88, "lane": "security alliance, defense coordination, strategic communications and military policy", "route": "power-structure-map.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 88, "networkReach": 89, "updatePriority": 80, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 86, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "NATO is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward security alliance, defense coordination, strategic communications and military policy. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 88/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for NATO unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 88, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to NATO." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "council-on-foreign-relations", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 31, "name": "Council on Foreign Relations", "suit": "Masks", "score": 84, "lane": "foreign-policy elite network, publications, convening power and policy formation", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Council on Foreign Relations is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward foreign-policy elite network, publications, convening power and policy formation. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Council on Foreign Relations unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Council on Foreign Relations." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "trilateral-commission", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 32, "name": "Trilateral Commission", "suit": "Masks", "score": 82, "lane": "transnational policy network and elite governance coordination route", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Trilateral Commission is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward transnational policy network and elite governance coordination route. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Trilateral Commission unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Trilateral Commission." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bilderberg-group", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 33, "name": "Bilderberg Group", "suit": "Masks", "score": 82, "lane": "elite conference network, informal policy dialogue and transparency questions", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Bilderberg Group is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward elite conference network, informal policy dialogue and transparency questions. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Bilderberg Group unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Bilderberg Group." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "chatham-house", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 34, "name": "Chatham House", "suit": "Masks", "score": 81, "lane": "foreign-policy institute, elite convening and international-affairs narrative route", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 81, "networkReach": 82, "updatePriority": 73, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 79, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Chatham House is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward foreign-policy institute, elite convening and international-affairs narrative route. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 81/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Chatham House unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 81, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Chatham House." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "atlantic-council", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 35, "name": "Atlantic Council", "suit": "Masks", "score": 80, "lane": "security-policy think tank, NATO alignment and geopolitical narrative route", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Atlantic Council is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward security-policy think tank, NATO alignment and geopolitical narrative route. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Atlantic Council unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Atlantic Council." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "brookings-institution", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 36, "name": "Brookings Institution", "suit": "Masks", "score": 78, "lane": "policy research, governance influence and establishment-policy pipeline", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Brookings Institution is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward policy research, governance influence and establishment-policy pipeline. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Brookings Institution unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Brookings Institution." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "gavi-the-vaccine-alliance", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 37, "name": "Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance", "suit": "Serpents", "score": 86, "lane": "vaccine finance, global health systems and public-private health governance", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 86, "networkReach": 87, "updatePriority": 78, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 84, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward vaccine finance, global health systems and public-private health governance. The Serpents suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 86/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 86, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "coalition-for-epidemic-preparedness-innovations", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 38, "name": "Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations", "suit": "Serpents", "score": 84, "lane": "pandemic preparedness, vaccine platforms and biosecurity relevance", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward pandemic preparedness, vaccine platforms and biosecurity relevance. The Serpents suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "food-and-agriculture-organization", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 39, "name": "Food and Agriculture Organization", "suit": "Serpents", "score": 80, "lane": "food systems, agricultural policy, sustainability and population-resource governance", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Food and Agriculture Organization is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward food systems, agricultural policy, sustainability and population-resource governance. The Serpents suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Food and Agriculture Organization unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Food and Agriculture Organization." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "codex-alimentarius-commission", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 40, "name": "Codex Alimentarius Commission", "suit": "Serpents", "score": 78, "lane": "food standards, global regulation and health/food governance route", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Codex Alimentarius Commission is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward food standards, global regulation and health/food governance route. The Serpents suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Codex Alimentarius Commission unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Codex Alimentarius Commission." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "reuters", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 41, "name": "Reuters", "suit": "Masks", "score": 78, "lane": "global newswire, institutional information distribution and narrative baseline setting", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Reuters is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward global newswire, institutional information distribution and narrative baseline setting. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Reuters unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Reuters." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "associated-press", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 42, "name": "Associated Press", "suit": "Masks", "score": 77, "lane": "global newswire, shared media facts and narrative infrastructure", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 77, "networkReach": 78, "updatePriority": 69, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 75, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Associated Press is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward global newswire, shared media facts and narrative infrastructure. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 77/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Associated Press unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 77, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Associated Press." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bbc", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 43, "name": "BBC", "suit": "Masks", "score": 76, "lane": "public broadcaster, global soft power, narrative formation and trust architecture", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 76, "networkReach": 77, "updatePriority": 68, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 74, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "BBC is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward public broadcaster, global soft power, narrative formation and trust architecture. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 76/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for BBC unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 76, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to BBC." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "the-new-york-times", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 44, "name": "The New York Times", "suit": "Masks", "score": 76, "lane": "elite media agenda-setting, institutional legitimacy and narrative power", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 76, "networkReach": 77, "updatePriority": 68, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 74, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "The New York Times is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward elite media agenda-setting, institutional legitimacy and narrative power. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 76/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for The New York Times unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 76, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to The New York Times." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bill-melinda-gates-foundation", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 45, "name": "Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation", "suit": "Serpents", "score": 90, "lane": "global health, vaccine systems, agriculture, digital public goods and philanthropy influence", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 90, "networkReach": 91, "updatePriority": 90, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 88, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward global health, vaccine systems, agriculture, digital public goods and philanthropy influence. The Serpents suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 90/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 90, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "open-society-foundations", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 46, "name": "Open Society Foundations", "suit": "Masks", "score": 82, "lane": "NGO networks, civil society funding, policy influence and political controversy route", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Open Society Foundations is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward NGO networks, civil society funding, policy influence and political controversy route. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Open Society Foundations unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Open Society Foundations." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "rockefeller-foundation", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 47, "name": "Rockefeller Foundation", "suit": "Serpents", "score": 84, "lane": "public health history, development policy, philanthropy and global systems influence", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Rockefeller Foundation is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward public health history, development policy, philanthropy and global systems influence. The Serpents suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Rockefeller Foundation unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Rockefeller Foundation." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "wellcome-trust", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 48, "name": "Wellcome Trust", "suit": "Serpents", "score": 82, "lane": "biomedical research, health funding, pandemic science and institutional influence", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Wellcome Trust is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward biomedical research, health funding, pandemic science and institutional influence. The Serpents suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Wellcome Trust unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Wellcome Trust." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "international-organization-for-standardization", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 49, "name": "International Organization for Standardization", "suit": "Keys", "score": 80, "lane": "standards infrastructure, technical governance and institutional interoperability", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "International Organization for Standardization is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward standards infrastructure, technical governance and institutional interoperability. The Keys suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for International Organization for Standardization unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to International Organization for Standardization." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "icann", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 50, "name": "ICANN", "suit": "Keys", "score": 79, "lane": "internet governance, domain infrastructure and global technical coordination", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 79, "networkReach": 80, "updatePriority": 71, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 77, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "ICANN is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward internet governance, domain infrastructure and global technical coordination. The Keys suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 79/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for ICANN unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 79, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to ICANN." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "swift", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 51, "name": "SWIFT", "suit": "Coins", "score": 87, "lane": "financial messaging, sanctions infrastructure and global payment rails", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 87, "networkReach": 88, "updatePriority": 79, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 85, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "SWIFT is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward financial messaging, sanctions infrastructure and global payment rails. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 87/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for SWIFT unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 87, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to SWIFT." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "world-wide-web-consortium", "deckId": "institutions", "deckTitle": "Institution Deck", "rank": 52, "name": "World Wide Web Consortium", "suit": "Keys", "score": 76, "lane": "web standards, digital architecture and technical governance route", "route": "evidence-graph.html", "sourceFile": "data/institution-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 76, "networkReach": 77, "updatePriority": 68, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 74, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "World Wide Web Consortium is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the institutions deck. The card points readers toward web standards, digital architecture and technical governance route. The Keys suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 76/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for World Wide Web Consortium unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 76, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to World Wide Web Consortium." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] } ], "power-families": [ { "id": "rothschild-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 1, "name": "Rothschild family", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 94, "lane": "banking, philanthropy, finance history and public family offices", "route": "power-families/rothschild-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 94, "networkReach": 95, "updatePriority": 94, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 92, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Rothschild family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward banking, philanthropy, finance history and public family offices. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 94/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Rothschild family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 94, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Rothschild family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "rockefeller-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 2, "name": "Rockefeller family", "suit": "Coins", "score": 93, "lane": "oil, banking history, philanthropy, universities and foundations", "route": "power-families/rockefeller-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 93, "networkReach": 94, "updatePriority": 93, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 91, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Rockefeller family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward oil, banking history, philanthropy, universities and foundations. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 93/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Rockefeller family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 93, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Rockefeller family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "house-of-saud", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 3, "name": "House of Saud", "suit": "Swords", "score": 92, "lane": "state monarchy, energy, sovereign wealth and diplomacy", "route": "power-families/house-of-saud.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 92, "networkReach": 93, "updatePriority": 92, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 90, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "House of Saud is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward state monarchy, energy, sovereign wealth and diplomacy. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 92/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for House of Saud unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 92, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to House of Saud." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "al-nahyan-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 4, "name": "Al Nahyan family", "suit": "Masks", "score": 91, "lane": "UAE state power, sovereign wealth, energy and investment", "route": "power-families/al-nahyan-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 91, "networkReach": 92, "updatePriority": 91, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 89, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Al Nahyan family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward UAE state power, sovereign wealth, energy and investment. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 91/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Al Nahyan family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 91, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Al Nahyan family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "al-thani-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 5, "name": "Al Thani family", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 90, "lane": "Qatar state power, media, energy and sovereign wealth", "route": "power-families/al-thani-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 90, "networkReach": 91, "updatePriority": 90, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 88, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Al Thani family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward Qatar state power, media, energy and sovereign wealth. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 90/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Al Thani family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 90, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Al Thani family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "al-maktoum-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 6, "name": "Al Maktoum family", "suit": "Coins", "score": 89, "lane": "Dubai state-business infrastructure, ports, finance and aviation", "route": "power-families/al-maktoum-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 89, "networkReach": 90, "updatePriority": 89, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 87, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Al Maktoum family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward Dubai state-business infrastructure, ports, finance and aviation. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 89/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Al Maktoum family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 89, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Al Maktoum family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "windsor-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 7, "name": "Windsor family", "suit": "Swords", "score": 88, "lane": "constitutional monarchy, land, diplomacy and symbolic soft power", "route": "power-families/windsor-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 88, "networkReach": 89, "updatePriority": 80, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 86, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Windsor family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward constitutional monarchy, land, diplomacy and symbolic soft power. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 88/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Windsor family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 88, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Windsor family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "walton-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 8, "name": "Walton family", "suit": "Masks", "score": 87, "lane": "retail, philanthropy, political donations and supply-chain scale", "route": "power-families/walton-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 87, "networkReach": 88, "updatePriority": 79, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 85, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Walton family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward retail, philanthropy, political donations and supply-chain scale. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 87/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Walton family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 87, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Walton family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "mars-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 9, "name": "Mars family", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 86, "lane": "global food, private enterprise and philanthropy", "route": "power-families/mars-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 86, "networkReach": 87, "updatePriority": 78, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 84, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Mars family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward global food, private enterprise and philanthropy. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 86/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Mars family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 86, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Mars family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "koch-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 10, "name": "Koch family", "suit": "Coins", "score": 85, "lane": "energy, political philanthropy, universities and policy networks", "route": "power-families/koch-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 85, "networkReach": 86, "updatePriority": 77, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 83, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Koch family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward energy, political philanthropy, universities and policy networks. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 85/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Koch family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 85, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Koch family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "ambani-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 11, "name": "Ambani family", "suit": "Swords", "score": 84, "lane": "telecom, energy, retail, media and Indian industrial policy", "route": "power-families/ambani-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Ambani family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward telecom, energy, retail, media and Indian industrial policy. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Ambani family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Ambani family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "adani-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 12, "name": "Adani family", "suit": "Masks", "score": 83, "lane": "ports, energy, infrastructure and national development routes", "route": "power-families/adani-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 83, "networkReach": 84, "updatePriority": 75, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 81, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Adani family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward ports, energy, infrastructure and national development routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 83/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Adani family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 83, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Adani family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "arnault-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 13, "name": "Arnault family", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 82, "lane": "luxury, media, culture and European capital", "route": "power-families/arnault-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Arnault family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward luxury, media, culture and European capital. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Arnault family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Arnault family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bettencourt-meyers-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 14, "name": "Bettencourt Meyers family", "suit": "Coins", "score": 91, "lane": "beauty, inheritance, philanthropy and European capital", "route": "power-families/bettencourt-meyers-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 91, "networkReach": 92, "updatePriority": 91, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 89, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Bettencourt Meyers family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward beauty, inheritance, philanthropy and European capital. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 91/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Bettencourt Meyers family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 91, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Bettencourt Meyers family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "quandt-klatten-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 15, "name": "Quandt-Klatten family", "suit": "Swords", "score": 90, "lane": "automotive, chemicals, industrial ownership and Germany routes", "route": "power-families/quandt-klatten-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 90, "networkReach": 91, "updatePriority": 90, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 88, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Quandt-Klatten family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward automotive, chemicals, industrial ownership and Germany routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 90/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Quandt-Klatten family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 90, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Quandt-Klatten family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "porsche-pi-ch-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 16, "name": "Porsche-Piëch family", "suit": "Masks", "score": 89, "lane": "automotive ownership, foundations and industrial strategy", "route": "power-families/porsche-pi-ch-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 89, "networkReach": 90, "updatePriority": 89, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 87, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Porsche-Piëch family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward automotive ownership, foundations and industrial strategy. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 89/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Porsche-Piëch family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 89, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Porsche-Piëch family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "agnelli-elkann-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 17, "name": "Agnelli-Elkann family", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 88, "lane": "automotive, media, finance and European board networks", "route": "power-families/agnelli-elkann-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 88, "networkReach": 89, "updatePriority": 80, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 86, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Agnelli-Elkann family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward automotive, media, finance and European board networks. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 88/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Agnelli-Elkann family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 88, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Agnelli-Elkann family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "lee-samsung-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 18, "name": "Lee Samsung family", "suit": "Coins", "score": 87, "lane": "technology, semiconductors, finance and South Korean chaebol power", "route": "power-families/lee-samsung-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 87, "networkReach": 88, "updatePriority": 79, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 85, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Lee Samsung family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward technology, semiconductors, finance and South Korean chaebol power. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 87/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Lee Samsung family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 87, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Lee Samsung family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "pritzker-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 19, "name": "Pritzker family", "suit": "Swords", "score": 86, "lane": "hotels, politics, philanthropy and civic institutions", "route": "power-families/pritzker-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 86, "networkReach": 87, "updatePriority": 78, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 84, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Pritzker family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward hotels, politics, philanthropy and civic institutions. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 86/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Pritzker family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 86, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Pritzker family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "cargill-macmillan-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 20, "name": "Cargill-MacMillan family", "suit": "Masks", "score": 85, "lane": "food commodities, agriculture and private-company scale", "route": "power-families/cargill-macmillan-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 85, "networkReach": 86, "updatePriority": 77, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 83, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Cargill-MacMillan family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward food commodities, agriculture and private-company scale. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 85/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Cargill-MacMillan family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 85, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Cargill-MacMillan family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "duncan-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 21, "name": "Duncan family", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 84, "lane": "energy infrastructure and pipeline wealth", "route": "power-families/duncan-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Duncan family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward energy infrastructure and pipeline wealth. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Duncan family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Duncan family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "lauder-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 22, "name": "Lauder family", "suit": "Coins", "score": 83, "lane": "beauty, diplomacy, art, media and philanthropy", "route": "power-families/lauder-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 83, "networkReach": 84, "updatePriority": 75, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 81, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Lauder family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward beauty, diplomacy, art, media and philanthropy. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 83/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Lauder family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 83, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Lauder family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "cox-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 23, "name": "Cox family", "suit": "Swords", "score": 82, "lane": "media, telecom, automotive services and philanthropy", "route": "power-families/cox-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Cox family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward media, telecom, automotive services and philanthropy. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Cox family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Cox family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "johnson-sc-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 24, "name": "Johnson SC family", "suit": "Masks", "score": 81, "lane": "consumer products, family enterprise and philanthropy", "route": "power-families/johnson-sc-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 81, "networkReach": 82, "updatePriority": 73, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 79, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Johnson SC family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward consumer products, family enterprise and philanthropy. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 81/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Johnson SC family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 81, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Johnson SC family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "mellon-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 25, "name": "Mellon family", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 80, "lane": "banking history, foundations, universities and art institutions", "route": "power-families/mellon-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Mellon family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward banking history, foundations, universities and art institutions. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Mellon family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Mellon family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "oppenheimer-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 26, "name": "Oppenheimer family", "suit": "Coins", "score": 79, "lane": "diamonds, conservation, investment and Africa routes", "route": "power-families/oppenheimer-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 79, "networkReach": 80, "updatePriority": 71, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 77, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Oppenheimer family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward diamonds, conservation, investment and Africa routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 79/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Oppenheimer family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 79, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Oppenheimer family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "rupert-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 27, "name": "Rupert family", "suit": "Swords", "score": 88, "lane": "luxury, banking, South African capital and philanthropy", "route": "power-families/rupert-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 88, "networkReach": 89, "updatePriority": 80, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 86, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Rupert family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward luxury, banking, South African capital and philanthropy. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 88/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Rupert family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 88, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Rupert family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "pinault-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 28, "name": "Pinault family", "suit": "Masks", "score": 87, "lane": "luxury, art, media and European finance", "route": "power-families/pinault-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 87, "networkReach": 88, "updatePriority": 79, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 85, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Pinault family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward luxury, art, media and European finance. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 87/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Pinault family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 87, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Pinault family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "dassault-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 29, "name": "Dassault family", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 86, "lane": "aerospace, media, defence industry and French capital", "route": "power-families/dassault-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 86, "networkReach": 87, "updatePriority": 78, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 84, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Dassault family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward aerospace, media, defence industry and French capital. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 86/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Dassault family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 86, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Dassault family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "dumas-herm-s-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 30, "name": "Dumas-Hermès family", "suit": "Coins", "score": 85, "lane": "luxury, heritage brand control and French capital", "route": "power-families/dumas-herm-s-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 85, "networkReach": 86, "updatePriority": 77, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 83, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Dumas-Hermès family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward luxury, heritage brand control and French capital. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 85/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Dumas-Hermès family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 85, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Dumas-Hermès family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "m-ller-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 31, "name": "Møller family", "suit": "Swords", "score": 84, "lane": "shipping, logistics, ports and foundation ownership", "route": "power-families/m-ller-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Møller family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward shipping, logistics, ports and foundation ownership. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Møller family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Møller family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "rausing-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 32, "name": "Rausing family", "suit": "Masks", "score": 83, "lane": "packaging, food systems and philanthropy", "route": "power-families/rausing-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 83, "networkReach": 84, "updatePriority": 75, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 81, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Rausing family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward packaging, food systems and philanthropy. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 83/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Rausing family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 83, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Rausing family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "ferrero-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 33, "name": "Ferrero family", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 82, "lane": "food brands, private enterprise and global distribution", "route": "power-families/ferrero-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Ferrero family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward food brands, private enterprise and global distribution. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Ferrero family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Ferrero family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "del-vecchio-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 34, "name": "Del Vecchio family", "suit": "Coins", "score": 81, "lane": "eyewear, finance and European corporate ownership", "route": "power-families/del-vecchio-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 81, "networkReach": 82, "updatePriority": 73, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 79, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Del Vecchio family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward eyewear, finance and European corporate ownership. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 81/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Del Vecchio family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 81, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Del Vecchio family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "benetton-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 35, "name": "Benetton family", "suit": "Swords", "score": 80, "lane": "retail, infrastructure and Italian capital", "route": "power-families/benetton-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Benetton family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward retail, infrastructure and Italian capital. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Benetton family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Benetton family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "newhouse-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 36, "name": "Newhouse family", "suit": "Masks", "score": 79, "lane": "media, publishing, cable and information lanes", "route": "power-families/newhouse-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 79, "networkReach": 80, "updatePriority": 71, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 77, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Newhouse family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward media, publishing, cable and information lanes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 79/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Newhouse family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 79, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Newhouse family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "hearst-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 37, "name": "Hearst family", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 78, "lane": "media, magazines, local news and philanthropy", "route": "power-families/hearst-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Hearst family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward media, magazines, local news and philanthropy. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Hearst family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Hearst family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "sulzberger-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 38, "name": "Sulzberger family", "suit": "Coins", "score": 77, "lane": "newspaper governance, media trust and family-control structure", "route": "power-families/sulzberger-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 77, "networkReach": 78, "updatePriority": 69, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 75, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Sulzberger family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward newspaper governance, media trust and family-control structure. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 77/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Sulzberger family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 77, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Sulzberger family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "redstone-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 39, "name": "Redstone family", "suit": "Swords", "score": 76, "lane": "media ownership, entertainment and information channels", "route": "power-families/redstone-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 76, "networkReach": 77, "updatePriority": 68, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 74, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Redstone family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward media ownership, entertainment and information channels. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 76/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Redstone family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 76, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Redstone family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "mohn-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 40, "name": "Mohn family", "suit": "Masks", "score": 85, "lane": "media, publishing, foundation policy and European influence", "route": "power-families/mohn-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 85, "networkReach": 86, "updatePriority": 77, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 83, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Mohn family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward media, publishing, foundation policy and European influence. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 85/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Mohn family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 85, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Mohn family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "albrecht-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 41, "name": "Albrecht family", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 84, "lane": "discount retail, food pricing and European supply chains", "route": "power-families/albrecht-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Albrecht family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward discount retail, food pricing and European supply chains. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Albrecht family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Albrecht family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "schwarz-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 42, "name": "Schwarz family", "suit": "Coins", "score": 83, "lane": "retail, food distribution, education and philanthropy", "route": "power-families/schwarz-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 83, "networkReach": 84, "updatePriority": 75, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 81, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Schwarz family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward retail, food distribution, education and philanthropy. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 83/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Schwarz family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 83, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Schwarz family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "tata-family-and-trusts", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 43, "name": "Tata family and trusts", "suit": "Swords", "score": 82, "lane": "Indian industry, philanthropy, technology and education", "route": "power-families/tata-family-and-trusts.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Tata family and trusts is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward Indian industry, philanthropy, technology and education. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Tata family and trusts unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Tata family and trusts." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "birla-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 44, "name": "Birla family", "suit": "Masks", "score": 81, "lane": "Indian industrial conglomerate and philanthropy", "route": "power-families/birla-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 81, "networkReach": 82, "updatePriority": 73, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 79, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Birla family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward Indian industrial conglomerate and philanthropy. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 81/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Birla family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 81, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Birla family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "soros-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 45, "name": "Soros family", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 80, "lane": "philanthropy, civil society, policy grants and public debate", "route": "power-families/soros-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Soros family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward philanthropy, civil society, policy grants and public debate. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Soros family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Soros family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bloomberg-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 46, "name": "Bloomberg family", "suit": "Coins", "score": 79, "lane": "media data, finance terminals, cities and philanthropy", "route": "power-families/bloomberg-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 79, "networkReach": 80, "updatePriority": 71, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 77, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Bloomberg family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward media data, finance terminals, cities and philanthropy. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 79/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Bloomberg family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 79, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Bloomberg family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "musk-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 47, "name": "Musk family", "suit": "Swords", "score": 78, "lane": "technology, space, social media, energy and public policy debate", "route": "power-families/musk-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Musk family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward technology, space, social media, energy and public policy debate. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Musk family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Musk family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "gates-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 48, "name": "Gates family", "suit": "Masks", "score": 77, "lane": "technology wealth, philanthropy, health and education", "route": "power-families/gates-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 77, "networkReach": 78, "updatePriority": 69, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 75, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Gates family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward technology wealth, philanthropy, health and education. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 77/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Gates family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 77, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Gates family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bezos-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 49, "name": "Bezos family", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 76, "lane": "commerce, cloud infrastructure, media and space", "route": "power-families/bezos-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 76, "networkReach": 77, "updatePriority": 68, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 74, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Bezos family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward commerce, cloud infrastructure, media and space. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 76/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Bezos family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 76, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Bezos family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "zuckerberg-chan-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 50, "name": "Zuckerberg-Chan family", "suit": "Coins", "score": 75, "lane": "social platforms, philanthropy, education and biomedical research", "route": "power-families/zuckerberg-chan-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 75, "networkReach": 76, "updatePriority": 67, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 73, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Zuckerberg-Chan family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward social platforms, philanthropy, education and biomedical research. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 75/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Zuckerberg-Chan family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 75, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Zuckerberg-Chan family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "page-brin-families", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 51, "name": "Page-Brin families", "suit": "Swords", "score": 74, "lane": "search, AI, data infrastructure and technology capital", "route": "power-families/page-brin-families.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 74, "networkReach": 75, "updatePriority": 66, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 72, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Page-Brin families is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward search, AI, data infrastructure and technology capital. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 74/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Page-Brin families unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 74, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Page-Brin families." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "ellison-family", "deckId": "power-families", "deckTitle": "Power Families Deck", "rank": 52, "name": "Ellison family", "suit": "Masks", "score": 73, "lane": "cloud, databases, health data and enterprise software", "route": "power-families/ellison-family.html", "sourceFile": "data/power-families-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 73, "networkReach": 74, "updatePriority": 65, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 71, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Ellison family is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the power-families deck. The card points readers toward cloud, databases, health data and enterprise software. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 73/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Ellison family unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 73, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Ellison family." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] } ], "secret-societies": [ { "id": "freemasonry", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 1, "name": "Freemasonry", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 90, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/freemasonry.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 90, "networkReach": 91, "updatePriority": 90, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 88, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Freemasonry is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 90/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Freemasonry unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 90, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Freemasonry." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "scottish-rite-freemasonry", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 2, "name": "Scottish Rite Freemasonry", "suit": "Coins", "score": 89, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/scottish-rite-freemasonry.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 89, "networkReach": 90, "updatePriority": 89, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 87, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Scottish Rite Freemasonry is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 89/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Scottish Rite Freemasonry unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 89, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Scottish Rite Freemasonry." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "york-rite-freemasonry", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 3, "name": "York Rite Freemasonry", "suit": "Swords", "score": 88, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/york-rite-freemasonry.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 88, "networkReach": 89, "updatePriority": 80, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 86, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "York Rite Freemasonry is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 88/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for York Rite Freemasonry unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 88, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to York Rite Freemasonry." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "shriners-international", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 4, "name": "Shriners International", "suit": "Masks", "score": 87, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/shriners-international.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 87, "networkReach": 88, "updatePriority": 79, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 85, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Shriners International is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 87/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Shriners International unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 87, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Shriners International." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "order-of-the-eastern-star", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 5, "name": "Order of the Eastern Star", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 86, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/order-of-the-eastern-star.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 86, "networkReach": 87, "updatePriority": 78, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 84, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Order of the Eastern Star is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 86/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Order of the Eastern Star unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 86, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Order of the Eastern Star." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "sovereign-military-order-of-malta", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 6, "name": "Sovereign Military Order of Malta", "suit": "Coins", "score": 85, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/sovereign-military-order-of-malta.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 85, "networkReach": 86, "updatePriority": 77, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 83, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Sovereign Military Order of Malta is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 85/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Sovereign Military Order of Malta unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 85, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Sovereign Military Order of Malta." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "knights-of-columbus", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 7, "name": "Knights of Columbus", "suit": "Swords", "score": 84, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/knights-of-columbus.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Knights of Columbus is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Knights of Columbus unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Knights of Columbus." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "odd-fellows", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 8, "name": "Odd Fellows", "suit": "Masks", "score": 83, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/odd-fellows.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 83, "networkReach": 84, "updatePriority": 75, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 81, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Odd Fellows is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 83/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Odd Fellows unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 83, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Odd Fellows." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "elks", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 9, "name": "Elks", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 82, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/elks.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Elks is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Elks unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Elks." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "moose-international", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 10, "name": "Moose International", "suit": "Coins", "score": 81, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/moose-international.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 81, "networkReach": 82, "updatePriority": 73, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 79, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Moose International is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 81/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Moose International unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 81, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Moose International." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "orange-order", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 11, "name": "Orange Order", "suit": "Swords", "score": 80, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/orange-order.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Orange Order is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Orange Order unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Orange Order." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "ancient-order-of-hibernians", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 12, "name": "Ancient Order of Hibernians", "suit": "Masks", "score": 79, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/ancient-order-of-hibernians.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 79, "networkReach": 80, "updatePriority": 71, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 77, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Ancient Order of Hibernians is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 79/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Ancient Order of Hibernians unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 79, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Ancient Order of Hibernians." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "rosicrucian-amorc", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 13, "name": "Rosicrucian AMORC", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 78, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/rosicrucian-amorc.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Rosicrucian AMORC is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Rosicrucian AMORC unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Rosicrucian AMORC." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "societas-rosicruciana-in-anglia", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 14, "name": "Societas Rosicruciana in Anglia", "suit": "Coins", "score": 87, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/societas-rosicruciana-in-anglia.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 87, "networkReach": 88, "updatePriority": 79, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 85, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Societas Rosicruciana in Anglia is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 87/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Societas Rosicruciana in Anglia unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 87, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Societas Rosicruciana in Anglia." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "hermetic-order-of-the-golden-dawn", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 15, "name": "Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn", "suit": "Swords", "score": 86, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/hermetic-order-of-the-golden-dawn.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 86, "networkReach": 87, "updatePriority": 78, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 84, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 86/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 86, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "ordo-templi-orientis", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 16, "name": "Ordo Templi Orientis", "suit": "Masks", "score": 85, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/ordo-templi-orientis.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 85, "networkReach": 86, "updatePriority": 77, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 83, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Ordo Templi Orientis is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 85/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Ordo Templi Orientis unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 85, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Ordo Templi Orientis." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "a-a-thelemic-order", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 17, "name": "A∴A∴ Thelemic order", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 84, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/a-a-thelemic-order.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "A∴A∴ Thelemic order is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for A∴A∴ Thelemic order unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to A∴A∴ Thelemic order." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "martinist-order", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 18, "name": "Martinist Order", "suit": "Coins", "score": 83, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/martinist-order.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 83, "networkReach": 84, "updatePriority": 75, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 81, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Martinist Order is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 83/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Martinist Order unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 83, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Martinist Order." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "memphis-misraim-rite", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 19, "name": "Memphis-Misraim Rite", "suit": "Swords", "score": 82, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/memphis-misraim-rite.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Memphis-Misraim Rite is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Memphis-Misraim Rite unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Memphis-Misraim Rite." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bavarian-illuminati-historical-file", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 20, "name": "Bavarian Illuminati historical file", "suit": "Masks", "score": 81, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/bavarian-illuminati-historical-file.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 81, "networkReach": 82, "updatePriority": 73, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 79, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Bavarian Illuminati historical file is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 81/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Bavarian Illuminati historical file unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 81, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Bavarian Illuminati historical file." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "carbonari-historical-network", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 21, "name": "Carbonari historical network", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 80, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/carbonari-historical-network.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Carbonari historical network is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Carbonari historical network unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Carbonari historical network." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "propaganda-due-p2-historical-file", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 22, "name": "Propaganda Due P2 historical file", "suit": "Coins", "score": 79, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/propaganda-due-p2-historical-file.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 79, "networkReach": 80, "updatePriority": 71, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 77, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Propaganda Due P2 historical file is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 79/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Propaganda Due P2 historical file unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 79, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Propaganda Due P2 historical file." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "skull-and-bones", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 23, "name": "Skull and Bones", "suit": "Swords", "score": 78, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/skull-and-bones.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Skull and Bones is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Skull and Bones unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Skull and Bones." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "scroll-and-key", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 24, "name": "Scroll and Key", "suit": "Masks", "score": 77, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/scroll-and-key.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 77, "networkReach": 78, "updatePriority": 69, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 75, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Scroll and Key is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 77/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Scroll and Key unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 77, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Scroll and Key." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "wolf-s-head-society", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 25, "name": "Wolf’s Head Society", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 76, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/wolf-s-head-society.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 76, "networkReach": 77, "updatePriority": 68, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 74, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Wolf’s Head Society is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 76/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Wolf’s Head Society unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 76, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Wolf’s Head Society." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "porcellian-club", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 26, "name": "Porcellian Club", "suit": "Coins", "score": 75, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/porcellian-club.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 75, "networkReach": 76, "updatePriority": 67, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 73, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Porcellian Club is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 75/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Porcellian Club unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 75, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Porcellian Club." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bohemian-club", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 27, "name": "Bohemian Club", "suit": "Swords", "score": 84, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/bohemian-club.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Bohemian Club is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Bohemian Club unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Bohemian Club." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bilderberg-meetings", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 28, "name": "Bilderberg Meetings", "suit": "Masks", "score": 83, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/bilderberg-meetings.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 83, "networkReach": 84, "updatePriority": 75, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 81, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Bilderberg Meetings is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 83/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Bilderberg Meetings unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 83, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Bilderberg Meetings." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "trilateral-commission", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 29, "name": "Trilateral Commission", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 82, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/trilateral-commission.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Trilateral Commission is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Trilateral Commission unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Trilateral Commission." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "pilgrims-society", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 30, "name": "Pilgrims Society", "suit": "Coins", "score": 81, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/pilgrims-society.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 81, "networkReach": 82, "updatePriority": 73, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 79, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Pilgrims Society is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 81/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Pilgrims Society unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 81, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Pilgrims Society." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "round-table-movement", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 31, "name": "Round Table movement", "suit": "Swords", "score": 80, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/round-table-movement.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Round Table movement is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Round Table movement unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Round Table movement." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "le-cercle", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 32, "name": "Le Cercle", "suit": "Masks", "score": 79, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/le-cercle.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 79, "networkReach": 80, "updatePriority": 71, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 77, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Le Cercle is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 79/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Le Cercle unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 79, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Le Cercle." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "club-of-rome", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 33, "name": "Club of Rome", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 78, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/club-of-rome.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Club of Rome is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Club of Rome unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Club of Rome." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "fabian-society", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 34, "name": "Fabian Society", "suit": "Coins", "score": 77, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/fabian-society.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 77, "networkReach": 78, "updatePriority": 69, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 75, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Fabian Society is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 77/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Fabian Society unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 77, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Fabian Society." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "theosophical-society", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 35, "name": "Theosophical Society", "suit": "Swords", "score": 76, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/theosophical-society.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 76, "networkReach": 77, "updatePriority": 68, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 74, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Theosophical Society is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 76/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Theosophical Society unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 76, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Theosophical Society." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "anthroposophical-society", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 36, "name": "Anthroposophical Society", "suit": "Masks", "score": 75, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/anthroposophical-society.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 75, "networkReach": 76, "updatePriority": 67, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 73, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Anthroposophical Society is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 75/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Anthroposophical Society unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 75, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Anthroposophical Society." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "lucis-trust", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 37, "name": "Lucis Trust", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 74, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/lucis-trust.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 74, "networkReach": 75, "updatePriority": 66, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 72, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Lucis Trust is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 74/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Lucis Trust unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 74, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Lucis Trust." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "opus-dei-public-route", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 38, "name": "Opus Dei public route", "suit": "Coins", "score": 73, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/opus-dei-public-route.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 73, "networkReach": 74, "updatePriority": 65, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 71, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Opus Dei public route is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 73/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Opus Dei public route unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 73, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Opus Dei public route." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "jesuit-order-public-route", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 39, "name": "Jesuit order public route", "suit": "Swords", "score": 72, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/jesuit-order-public-route.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 72, "networkReach": 73, "updatePriority": 64, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 70, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Jesuit order public route is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 72/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Jesuit order public route unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 72, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Jesuit order public route." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "order-of-the-holy-sepulchre", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 40, "name": "Order of the Holy Sepulchre", "suit": "Masks", "score": 81, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/order-of-the-holy-sepulchre.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 81, "networkReach": 82, "updatePriority": 73, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 79, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Order of the Holy Sepulchre is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 81/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Order of the Holy Sepulchre unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 81, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Order of the Holy Sepulchre." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "vatican-diplomatic-orders-route", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 41, "name": "Vatican diplomatic orders route", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 80, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/vatican-diplomatic-orders-route.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Vatican diplomatic orders route is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Vatican diplomatic orders route unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Vatican diplomatic orders route." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "ditchley-foundation-network", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 42, "name": "Ditchley Foundation network", "suit": "Coins", "score": 79, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/ditchley-foundation-network.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 79, "networkReach": 80, "updatePriority": 71, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 77, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Ditchley Foundation network is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 79/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Ditchley Foundation network unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 79, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Ditchley Foundation network." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "rhodes-trust-network", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 43, "name": "Rhodes Trust network", "suit": "Swords", "score": 78, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/rhodes-trust-network.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Rhodes Trust network is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Rhodes Trust network unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Rhodes Trust network." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "cecil-rhodes-legacy-route", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 44, "name": "Cecil Rhodes legacy route", "suit": "Masks", "score": 77, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/cecil-rhodes-legacy-route.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 77, "networkReach": 78, "updatePriority": 69, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 75, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Cecil Rhodes legacy route is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 77/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Cecil Rhodes legacy route unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 77, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Cecil Rhodes legacy route." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "rotary-international", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 45, "name": "Rotary International", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 76, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/rotary-international.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 76, "networkReach": 77, "updatePriority": 68, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 74, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Rotary International is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 76/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Rotary International unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 76, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Rotary International." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "lions-clubs-international", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 46, "name": "Lions Clubs International", "suit": "Coins", "score": 75, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/lions-clubs-international.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 75, "networkReach": 76, "updatePriority": 67, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 73, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Lions Clubs International is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 75/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Lions Clubs International unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 75, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Lions Clubs International." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "kiwanis-international", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 47, "name": "Kiwanis International", "suit": "Swords", "score": 74, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/kiwanis-international.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 74, "networkReach": 75, "updatePriority": 66, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 72, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Kiwanis International is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 74/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Kiwanis International unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 74, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Kiwanis International." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "junior-chamber-international", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 48, "name": "Junior Chamber International", "suit": "Masks", "score": 73, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/junior-chamber-international.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 73, "networkReach": 74, "updatePriority": 65, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 71, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Junior Chamber International is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 73/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Junior Chamber International unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 73, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Junior Chamber International." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "mensa-international", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 49, "name": "Mensa International", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 72, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/mensa-international.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 72, "networkReach": 73, "updatePriority": 64, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 70, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Mensa International is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 72/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Mensa International unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 72, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Mensa International." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "world-economic-forum-young-global-leaders", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 50, "name": "World Economic Forum Young Global Leaders", "suit": "Coins", "score": 71, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/world-economic-forum-young-global-leaders.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 71, "networkReach": 72, "updatePriority": 63, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 69, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "World Economic Forum Young Global Leaders is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 71/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for World Economic Forum Young Global Leaders unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 71, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to World Economic Forum Young Global Leaders." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "global-shapers-community", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 51, "name": "Global Shapers Community", "suit": "Swords", "score": 70, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/global-shapers-community.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 70, "networkReach": 71, "updatePriority": 62, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 68, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Global Shapers Community is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 70/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Global Shapers Community unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 70, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Global Shapers Community." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "ted-ted-fellows-network", "deckId": "secret-societies", "deckTitle": "Secret Societies Deck", "rank": 52, "name": "TED / TED Fellows network", "suit": "Masks", "score": 69, "lane": "orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes", "route": "secret-societies/ted-ted-fellows-network.html", "sourceFile": "data/secret-societies-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 69, "networkReach": 70, "updatePriority": 61, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 67, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "TED / TED Fellows network is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the secret-societies deck. The card points readers toward orders, societies, clubs, fraternal networks and symbolic influence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 69/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for TED / TED Fellows network unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 69, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to TED / TED Fellows network." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] } ], "policy": [ { "id": "un-sustainable-development-goals", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 1, "name": "UN Sustainable Development Goals", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 96, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/un-sustainable-development-goals.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 96, "networkReach": 97, "updatePriority": 96, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 94, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "UN Sustainable Development Goals is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 96/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for UN Sustainable Development Goals unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 96, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to UN Sustainable Development Goals." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "un-pact-for-the-future", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 2, "name": "UN Pact for the Future", "suit": "Coins", "score": 95, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/un-pact-for-the-future.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 95, "networkReach": 96, "updatePriority": 95, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 93, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "UN Pact for the Future is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 95/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for UN Pact for the Future unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 95, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to UN Pact for the Future." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "who-pandemic-agreement", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 3, "name": "WHO Pandemic Agreement", "suit": "Swords", "score": 94, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/who-pandemic-agreement.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 94, "networkReach": 95, "updatePriority": 94, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 92, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "WHO Pandemic Agreement is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 94/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for WHO Pandemic Agreement unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 94, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to WHO Pandemic Agreement." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "international-health-regulations-amendments", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 4, "name": "International Health Regulations amendments", "suit": "Masks", "score": 93, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/international-health-regulations-amendments.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 93, "networkReach": 94, "updatePriority": 93, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 91, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "International Health Regulations amendments is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 93/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for International Health Regulations amendments unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 93, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to International Health Regulations amendments." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "pathogen-access-and-benefit-sharing-pabs-annex", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 5, "name": "Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing PABS annex", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 92, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/pathogen-access-and-benefit-sharing-pabs-annex.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 92, "networkReach": 93, "updatePriority": 92, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 90, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing PABS annex is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 92/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing PABS annex unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 92, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing PABS annex." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "eidas-2-european-digital-identity-wallet", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 6, "name": "eIDAS 2 / European Digital Identity Wallet", "suit": "Coins", "score": 91, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/eidas-2-european-digital-identity-wallet.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 91, "networkReach": 92, "updatePriority": 91, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 89, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "eIDAS 2 / European Digital Identity Wallet is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 91/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for eIDAS 2 / European Digital Identity Wallet unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 91, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to eIDAS 2 / European Digital Identity Wallet." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "eu-digital-services-act", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 7, "name": "EU Digital Services Act", "suit": "Swords", "score": 90, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/eu-digital-services-act.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 90, "networkReach": 91, "updatePriority": 90, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 88, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "EU Digital Services Act is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 90/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for EU Digital Services Act unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 90, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to EU Digital Services Act." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "eu-digital-markets-act", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 8, "name": "EU Digital Markets Act", "suit": "Masks", "score": 89, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/eu-digital-markets-act.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 89, "networkReach": 90, "updatePriority": 89, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 87, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "EU Digital Markets Act is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 89/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for EU Digital Markets Act unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 89, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to EU Digital Markets Act." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "eu-ai-act", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 9, "name": "EU AI Act", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 88, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/eu-ai-act.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 88, "networkReach": 89, "updatePriority": 80, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 86, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "EU AI Act is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 88/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for EU AI Act unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 88, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to EU AI Act." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "uk-online-safety-act", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 10, "name": "UK Online Safety Act", "suit": "Coins", "score": 87, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/uk-online-safety-act.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 87, "networkReach": 88, "updatePriority": 79, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 85, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "UK Online Safety Act is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 87/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for UK Online Safety Act unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 87, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to UK Online Safety Act." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "digital-euro-legislative-package", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 11, "name": "Digital euro legislative package", "suit": "Swords", "score": 86, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/digital-euro-legislative-package.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 86, "networkReach": 87, "updatePriority": 78, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 84, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Digital euro legislative package is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 86/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Digital euro legislative package unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 86, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Digital euro legislative package." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "g20-cross-border-payments-roadmap", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 12, "name": "G20 cross-border payments roadmap", "suit": "Masks", "score": 85, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/g20-cross-border-payments-roadmap.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 85, "networkReach": 86, "updatePriority": 77, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 83, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "G20 cross-border payments roadmap is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 85/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for G20 cross-border payments roadmap unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 85, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to G20 cross-border payments roadmap." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bis-project-mbridge-multi-cbdc-bridge", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 13, "name": "BIS Project mBridge / multi-CBDC bridge", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 84, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/bis-project-mbridge-multi-cbdc-bridge.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "BIS Project mBridge / multi-CBDC bridge is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for BIS Project mBridge / multi-CBDC bridge unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to BIS Project mBridge / multi-CBDC bridge." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "fatf-travel-rule-for-virtual-assets", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 14, "name": "FATF Travel Rule for virtual assets", "suit": "Coins", "score": 93, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/fatf-travel-rule-for-virtual-assets.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 93, "networkReach": 94, "updatePriority": 93, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 91, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "FATF Travel Rule for virtual assets is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 93/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for FATF Travel Rule for virtual assets unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 93, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to FATF Travel Rule for virtual assets." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "oecd-common-reporting-standard", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 15, "name": "OECD Common Reporting Standard", "suit": "Swords", "score": 92, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/oecd-common-reporting-standard.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 92, "networkReach": 93, "updatePriority": 92, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 90, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "OECD Common Reporting Standard is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 92/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for OECD Common Reporting Standard unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 92, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to OECD Common Reporting Standard." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "oecd-crypto-asset-reporting-framework", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 16, "name": "OECD Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework", "suit": "Masks", "score": 91, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/oecd-crypto-asset-reporting-framework.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 91, "networkReach": 92, "updatePriority": 91, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 89, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "OECD Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 91/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for OECD Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 91, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to OECD Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "issb-global-sustainability-disclosure-standards", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 17, "name": "ISSB global sustainability disclosure standards", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 90, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/issb-global-sustainability-disclosure-standards.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 90, "networkReach": 91, "updatePriority": 90, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 88, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "ISSB global sustainability disclosure standards is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 90/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for ISSB global sustainability disclosure standards unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 90, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to ISSB global sustainability disclosure standards." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "eu-corporate-sustainability-reporting-directive", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 18, "name": "EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive", "suit": "Coins", "score": 89, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/eu-corporate-sustainability-reporting-directive.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 89, "networkReach": 90, "updatePriority": 89, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 87, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 89/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 89, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "eu-corporate-sustainability-due-diligence-directive", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 19, "name": "EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive", "suit": "Swords", "score": 88, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/eu-corporate-sustainability-due-diligence-directive.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 88, "networkReach": 89, "updatePriority": 80, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 86, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 88/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 88, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "eu-carbon-border-adjustment-mechanism", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 20, "name": "EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism", "suit": "Masks", "score": 87, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/eu-carbon-border-adjustment-mechanism.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 87, "networkReach": 88, "updatePriority": 79, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 85, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 87/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 87, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "eu-emissions-trading-system-expansion", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 21, "name": "EU Emissions Trading System expansion", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 86, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/eu-emissions-trading-system-expansion.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 86, "networkReach": 87, "updatePriority": 78, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 84, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "EU Emissions Trading System expansion is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 86/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for EU Emissions Trading System expansion unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 86, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to EU Emissions Trading System expansion." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "net-zero-national-commitments", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 22, "name": "Net Zero national commitments", "suit": "Coins", "score": 85, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/net-zero-national-commitments.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 85, "networkReach": 86, "updatePriority": 77, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 83, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Net Zero national commitments is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 85/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Net Zero national commitments unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 85, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Net Zero national commitments." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "nationally-determined-contributions-under-paris-agreement", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 23, "name": "Nationally Determined Contributions under Paris Agreement", "suit": "Swords", "score": 84, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/nationally-determined-contributions-under-paris-agreement.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Nationally Determined Contributions under Paris Agreement is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Nationally Determined Contributions under Paris Agreement unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Nationally Determined Contributions under Paris Agreement." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "global-methane-pledge", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 24, "name": "Global Methane Pledge", "suit": "Masks", "score": 83, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/global-methane-pledge.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 83, "networkReach": 84, "updatePriority": 75, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 81, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Global Methane Pledge is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 83/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Global Methane Pledge unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 83, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Global Methane Pledge." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "corsia-aviation-emissions-scheme", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 25, "name": "CORSIA aviation emissions scheme", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 82, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/corsia-aviation-emissions-scheme.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "CORSIA aviation emissions scheme is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for CORSIA aviation emissions scheme unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to CORSIA aviation emissions scheme." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "smart-city-digital-infrastructure-strategies", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 26, "name": "Smart city digital infrastructure strategies", "suit": "Coins", "score": 81, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/smart-city-digital-infrastructure-strategies.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 81, "networkReach": 82, "updatePriority": 73, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 79, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Smart city digital infrastructure strategies is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 81/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Smart city digital infrastructure strategies unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 81, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Smart city digital infrastructure strategies." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "un-global-compact-for-migration", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 27, "name": "UN Global Compact for Migration", "suit": "Swords", "score": 90, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/un-global-compact-for-migration.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 90, "networkReach": 91, "updatePriority": 90, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 88, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "UN Global Compact for Migration is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 90/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for UN Global Compact for Migration unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 90, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to UN Global Compact for Migration." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "eu-migration-and-asylum-pact", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 28, "name": "EU Migration and Asylum Pact", "suit": "Masks", "score": 89, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/eu-migration-and-asylum-pact.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 89, "networkReach": 90, "updatePriority": 89, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 87, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "EU Migration and Asylum Pact is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 89/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for EU Migration and Asylum Pact unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 89, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to EU Migration and Asylum Pact." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "entry-exit-system-ees", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 29, "name": "Entry/Exit System EES", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 88, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/entry-exit-system-ees.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 88, "networkReach": 89, "updatePriority": 80, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 86, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Entry/Exit System EES is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 88/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Entry/Exit System EES unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 88, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Entry/Exit System EES." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "etias-travel-authorisation", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 30, "name": "ETIAS travel authorisation", "suit": "Coins", "score": 87, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/etias-travel-authorisation.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 87, "networkReach": 88, "updatePriority": 79, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 85, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "ETIAS travel authorisation is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 87/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for ETIAS travel authorisation unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 87, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to ETIAS travel authorisation." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "icao-digital-travel-credential-standards", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 31, "name": "ICAO digital travel credential standards", "suit": "Swords", "score": 86, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/icao-digital-travel-credential-standards.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 86, "networkReach": 87, "updatePriority": 78, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 84, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "ICAO digital travel credential standards is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 86/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for ICAO digital travel credential standards unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 86, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to ICAO digital travel credential standards." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "biometric-border-systems", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 32, "name": "Biometric border systems", "suit": "Masks", "score": 85, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/biometric-border-systems.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 85, "networkReach": 86, "updatePriority": 77, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 83, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Biometric border systems is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 85/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Biometric border systems unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 85, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Biometric border systems." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "digital-health-certificate-frameworks", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 33, "name": "Digital health certificate frameworks", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 84, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/digital-health-certificate-frameworks.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Digital health certificate frameworks is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Digital health certificate frameworks unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Digital health certificate frameworks." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "national-digital-health-records-strategies", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 34, "name": "National digital health records strategies", "suit": "Coins", "score": 83, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/national-digital-health-records-strategies.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 83, "networkReach": 84, "updatePriority": 75, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 81, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "National digital health records strategies is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 83/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for National digital health records strategies unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 83, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to National digital health records strategies." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "electronic-invoicing-mandates", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 35, "name": "Electronic invoicing mandates", "suit": "Swords", "score": 82, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/electronic-invoicing-mandates.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Electronic invoicing mandates is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Electronic invoicing mandates unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Electronic invoicing mandates." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "real-time-tax-reporting-systems", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 36, "name": "Real-time tax reporting systems", "suit": "Masks", "score": 81, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/real-time-tax-reporting-systems.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 81, "networkReach": 82, "updatePriority": 73, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 79, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Real-time tax reporting systems is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 81/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Real-time tax reporting systems unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 81, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Real-time tax reporting systems." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "open-banking-and-digital-finance-rules", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 37, "name": "Open banking and digital finance rules", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 80, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/open-banking-and-digital-finance-rules.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Open banking and digital finance rules is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Open banking and digital finance rules unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Open banking and digital finance rules." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "stablecoin-regulation-frameworks", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 38, "name": "Stablecoin regulation frameworks", "suit": "Coins", "score": 79, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/stablecoin-regulation-frameworks.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 79, "networkReach": 80, "updatePriority": 71, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 77, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Stablecoin regulation frameworks is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 79/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Stablecoin regulation frameworks unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 79, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Stablecoin regulation frameworks." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "mica-crypto-asset-regulation", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 39, "name": "MiCA crypto-asset regulation", "suit": "Swords", "score": 78, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/mica-crypto-asset-regulation.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "MiCA crypto-asset regulation is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for MiCA crypto-asset regulation unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to MiCA crypto-asset regulation." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "central-bank-instant-payment-systems", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 40, "name": "Central bank instant payment systems", "suit": "Masks", "score": 87, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/central-bank-instant-payment-systems.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 87, "networkReach": 88, "updatePriority": 79, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 85, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Central bank instant payment systems is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 87/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Central bank instant payment systems unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 87, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Central bank instant payment systems." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "age-verification-online-access-laws", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 41, "name": "Age verification / online access laws", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 86, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/age-verification-online-access-laws.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 86, "networkReach": 87, "updatePriority": 78, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 84, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Age verification / online access laws is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 86/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Age verification / online access laws unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 86, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Age verification / online access laws." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "platform-transparency-reporting-laws", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 42, "name": "Platform transparency reporting laws", "suit": "Coins", "score": 85, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/platform-transparency-reporting-laws.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 85, "networkReach": 86, "updatePriority": 77, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 83, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Platform transparency reporting laws is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 85/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Platform transparency reporting laws unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 85, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Platform transparency reporting laws." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "trusted-flagger-and-illegal-content-notice-systems", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 43, "name": "Trusted flagger and illegal-content notice systems", "suit": "Swords", "score": 84, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/trusted-flagger-and-illegal-content-notice-systems.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Trusted flagger and illegal-content notice systems is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Trusted flagger and illegal-content notice systems unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Trusted flagger and illegal-content notice systems." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "cyber-resilience-legislation", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 44, "name": "Cyber resilience legislation", "suit": "Masks", "score": 83, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/cyber-resilience-legislation.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 83, "networkReach": 84, "updatePriority": 75, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 81, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Cyber resilience legislation is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 83/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Cyber resilience legislation unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 83, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Cyber resilience legislation." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "nis2-cybersecurity-directive", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 45, "name": "NIS2 cybersecurity directive", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 82, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/nis2-cybersecurity-directive.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "NIS2 cybersecurity directive is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for NIS2 cybersecurity directive unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to NIS2 cybersecurity directive." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "critical-entities-resilience-directive", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 46, "name": "Critical Entities Resilience directive", "suit": "Coins", "score": 81, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/critical-entities-resilience-directive.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 81, "networkReach": 82, "updatePriority": 73, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 79, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Critical Entities Resilience directive is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 81/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Critical Entities Resilience directive unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 81, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Critical Entities Resilience directive." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "digital-public-infrastructure-policies", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 47, "name": "Digital public infrastructure policies", "suit": "Swords", "score": 80, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/digital-public-infrastructure-policies.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Digital public infrastructure policies is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Digital public infrastructure policies unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Digital public infrastructure policies." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "india-stack-dpi-export-model", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 48, "name": "India Stack / DPI export model", "suit": "Masks", "score": 79, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/india-stack-dpi-export-model.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 79, "networkReach": 80, "updatePriority": 71, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 77, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "India Stack / DPI export model is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 79/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for India Stack / DPI export model unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 79, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to India Stack / DPI export model." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "world-bank-id4d-identity-programmes", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 49, "name": "World Bank ID4D identity programmes", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 78, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/world-bank-id4d-identity-programmes.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "World Bank ID4D identity programmes is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for World Bank ID4D identity programmes unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to World Bank ID4D identity programmes." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "govtech-digital-service-mandates", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 50, "name": "GovTech digital service mandates", "suit": "Coins", "score": 77, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/govtech-digital-service-mandates.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 77, "networkReach": 78, "updatePriority": 69, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 75, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "GovTech digital service mandates is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 77/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for GovTech digital service mandates unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 77, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to GovTech digital service mandates." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "cbdc-offline-wallet-design-rules", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 51, "name": "CBDC offline wallet design rules", "suit": "Swords", "score": 76, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/cbdc-offline-wallet-design-rules.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 76, "networkReach": 77, "updatePriority": 68, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 74, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "CBDC offline wallet design rules is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 76/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for CBDC offline wallet design rules unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 76, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to CBDC offline wallet design rules." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "programmable-compliance-in-payments", "deckId": "policy", "deckTitle": "Policy Deck", "rank": 52, "name": "Programmable compliance in payments", "suit": "Masks", "score": 75, "lane": "global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes", "route": "policy/programmable-compliance-in-payments.html", "sourceFile": "data/policy-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 75, "networkReach": 76, "updatePriority": 67, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 73, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Programmable compliance in payments is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the policy deck. The card points readers toward global policy, standards, implementation and convergence routes. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 75/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Programmable compliance in payments unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 75, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Programmable compliance in payments." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] } ], "think-tanks": [ { "id": "council-on-foreign-relations", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 1, "name": "Council on Foreign Relations", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 93, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/council-on-foreign-relations.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 93, "networkReach": 94, "updatePriority": 93, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 91, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Council on Foreign Relations is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 93/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Council on Foreign Relations unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 93, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Council on Foreign Relations." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "brookings-institution", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 2, "name": "Brookings Institution", "suit": "Coins", "score": 92, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/brookings-institution.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 92, "networkReach": 93, "updatePriority": 92, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 90, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Brookings Institution is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 92/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Brookings Institution unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 92, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Brookings Institution." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "chatham-house", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 3, "name": "Chatham House", "suit": "Swords", "score": 91, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/chatham-house.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 91, "networkReach": 92, "updatePriority": 91, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 89, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Chatham House is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 91/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Chatham House unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 91, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Chatham House." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "rand-corporation", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 4, "name": "RAND Corporation", "suit": "Masks", "score": 90, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/rand-corporation.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 90, "networkReach": 91, "updatePriority": 90, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 88, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "RAND Corporation is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 90/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for RAND Corporation unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 90, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to RAND Corporation." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "center-for-strategic-and-international-studies", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 5, "name": "Center for Strategic and International Studies", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 89, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/center-for-strategic-and-international-studies.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 89, "networkReach": 90, "updatePriority": 89, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 87, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Center for Strategic and International Studies is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 89/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Center for Strategic and International Studies unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 89, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Center for Strategic and International Studies." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "atlantic-council", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 6, "name": "Atlantic Council", "suit": "Coins", "score": 88, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/atlantic-council.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 88, "networkReach": 89, "updatePriority": 80, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 86, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Atlantic Council is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 88/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Atlantic Council unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 88, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Atlantic Council." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "carnegie-endowment-for-international-peace", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 7, "name": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace", "suit": "Swords", "score": 87, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/carnegie-endowment-for-international-peace.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 87, "networkReach": 88, "updatePriority": 79, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 85, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 87/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Carnegie Endowment for International Peace unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 87, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Carnegie Endowment for International Peace." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "heritage-foundation", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 8, "name": "Heritage Foundation", "suit": "Masks", "score": 86, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/heritage-foundation.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 86, "networkReach": 87, "updatePriority": 78, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 84, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Heritage Foundation is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 86/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Heritage Foundation unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 86, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Heritage Foundation." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "american-enterprise-institute", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 9, "name": "American Enterprise Institute", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 85, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/american-enterprise-institute.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 85, "networkReach": 86, "updatePriority": 77, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 83, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "American Enterprise Institute is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 85/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for American Enterprise Institute unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 85, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to American Enterprise Institute." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "cato-institute", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 10, "name": "Cato Institute", "suit": "Coins", "score": 84, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/cato-institute.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Cato Institute is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Cato Institute unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Cato Institute." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "aspen-institute", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 11, "name": "Aspen Institute", "suit": "Swords", "score": 83, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/aspen-institute.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 83, "networkReach": 84, "updatePriority": 75, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 81, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Aspen Institute is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 83/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Aspen Institute unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 83, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Aspen Institute." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "wilson-center", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 12, "name": "Wilson Center", "suit": "Masks", "score": 82, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/wilson-center.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Wilson Center is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Wilson Center unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Wilson Center." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "hoover-institution", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 13, "name": "Hoover Institution", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 81, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/hoover-institution.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 81, "networkReach": 82, "updatePriority": 73, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 79, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Hoover Institution is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 81/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Hoover Institution unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 81, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Hoover Institution." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "belfer-center", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 14, "name": "Belfer Center", "suit": "Coins", "score": 90, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/belfer-center.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 90, "networkReach": 91, "updatePriority": 90, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 88, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Belfer Center is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 90/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Belfer Center unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 90, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Belfer Center." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "peterson-institute-for-international-economics", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 15, "name": "Peterson Institute for International Economics", "suit": "Swords", "score": 89, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/peterson-institute-for-international-economics.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 89, "networkReach": 90, "updatePriority": 89, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 87, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Peterson Institute for International Economics is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 89/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Peterson Institute for International Economics unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 89, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Peterson Institute for International Economics." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "center-for-a-new-american-security", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 16, "name": "Center for a New American Security", "suit": "Masks", "score": 88, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/center-for-a-new-american-security.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 88, "networkReach": 89, "updatePriority": 80, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 86, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Center for a New American Security is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 88/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Center for a New American Security unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 88, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Center for a New American Security." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "new-america", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 17, "name": "New America", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 87, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/new-america.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 87, "networkReach": 88, "updatePriority": 79, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 85, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "New America is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 87/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for New America unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 87, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to New America." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "center-for-american-progress", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 18, "name": "Center for American Progress", "suit": "Coins", "score": 86, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/center-for-american-progress.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 86, "networkReach": 87, "updatePriority": 78, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 84, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Center for American Progress is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 86/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Center for American Progress unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 86, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Center for American Progress." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "hudson-institute", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 19, "name": "Hudson Institute", "suit": "Swords", "score": 85, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/hudson-institute.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 85, "networkReach": 86, "updatePriority": 77, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 83, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Hudson Institute is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 85/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Hudson Institute unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 85, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Hudson Institute." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "manhattan-institute", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 20, "name": "Manhattan Institute", "suit": "Masks", "score": 84, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/manhattan-institute.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Manhattan Institute is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Manhattan Institute unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Manhattan Institute." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "mercatus-center", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 21, "name": "Mercatus Center", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 83, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/mercatus-center.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 83, "networkReach": 84, "updatePriority": 75, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 81, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Mercatus Center is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 83/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Mercatus Center unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 83, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Mercatus Center." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "urban-institute", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 22, "name": "Urban Institute", "suit": "Coins", "score": 82, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/urban-institute.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Urban Institute is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Urban Institute unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Urban Institute." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "world-resources-institute", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 23, "name": "World Resources Institute", "suit": "Swords", "score": 81, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/world-resources-institute.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 81, "networkReach": 82, "updatePriority": 73, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 79, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "World Resources Institute is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 81/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for World Resources Institute unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 81, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to World Resources Institute." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "international-institute-for-sustainable-development", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 24, "name": "International Institute for Sustainable Development", "suit": "Masks", "score": 80, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/international-institute-for-sustainable-development.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "International Institute for Sustainable Development is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for International Institute for Sustainable Development unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to International Institute for Sustainable Development." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "overseas-development-institute", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 25, "name": "Overseas Development Institute", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 79, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/overseas-development-institute.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 79, "networkReach": 80, "updatePriority": 71, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 77, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Overseas Development Institute is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 79/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Overseas Development Institute unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 79, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Overseas Development Institute." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "international-institute-for-strategic-studies", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 26, "name": "International Institute for Strategic Studies", "suit": "Coins", "score": 78, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/international-institute-for-strategic-studies.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "International Institute for Strategic Studies is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for International Institute for Strategic Studies unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to International Institute for Strategic Studies." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "royal-united-services-institute", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 27, "name": "Royal United Services Institute", "suit": "Swords", "score": 87, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/royal-united-services-institute.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 87, "networkReach": 88, "updatePriority": 79, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 85, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Royal United Services Institute is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 87/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Royal United Services Institute unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 87, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Royal United Services Institute." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "sipri", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 28, "name": "SIPRI", "suit": "Masks", "score": 86, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/sipri.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 86, "networkReach": 87, "updatePriority": 78, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 84, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "SIPRI is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 86/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for SIPRI unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 86, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to SIPRI." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "german-marshall-fund", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 29, "name": "German Marshall Fund", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 85, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/german-marshall-fund.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 85, "networkReach": 86, "updatePriority": 77, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 83, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "German Marshall Fund is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 85/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for German Marshall Fund unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 85, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to German Marshall Fund." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bruegel", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 30, "name": "Bruegel", "suit": "Coins", "score": 84, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/bruegel.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Bruegel is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Bruegel unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Bruegel." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "centre-for-european-policy-studies", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 31, "name": "Centre for European Policy Studies", "suit": "Swords", "score": 83, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/centre-for-european-policy-studies.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 83, "networkReach": 84, "updatePriority": 75, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 81, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Centre for European Policy Studies is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 83/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Centre for European Policy Studies unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 83, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Centre for European Policy Studies." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "european-council-on-foreign-relations", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 32, "name": "European Council on Foreign Relations", "suit": "Masks", "score": 82, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/european-council-on-foreign-relations.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "European Council on Foreign Relations is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for European Council on Foreign Relations unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to European Council on Foreign Relations." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "swp-berlin", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 33, "name": "SWP Berlin", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 81, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/swp-berlin.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 81, "networkReach": 82, "updatePriority": 73, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 79, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "SWP Berlin is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 81/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for SWP Berlin unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 81, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to SWP Berlin." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "institut-fran-ais-des-relations-internationales", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 34, "name": "Institut français des relations internationales", "suit": "Coins", "score": 80, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/institut-fran-ais-des-relations-internationales.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Institut français des relations internationales is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Institut français des relations internationales unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Institut français des relations internationales." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "institut-montaigne", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 35, "name": "Institut Montaigne", "suit": "Swords", "score": 79, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/institut-montaigne.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 79, "networkReach": 80, "updatePriority": 71, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 77, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Institut Montaigne is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 79/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Institut Montaigne unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 79, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Institut Montaigne." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "clingendael-institute", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 36, "name": "Clingendael Institute", "suit": "Masks", "score": 78, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/clingendael-institute.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Clingendael Institute is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Clingendael Institute unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Clingendael Institute." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "lowy-institute", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 37, "name": "Lowy Institute", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 77, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/lowy-institute.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 77, "networkReach": 78, "updatePriority": 69, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 75, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Lowy Institute is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 77/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Lowy Institute unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 77, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Lowy Institute." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "australian-strategic-policy-institute", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 38, "name": "Australian Strategic Policy Institute", "suit": "Coins", "score": 76, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/australian-strategic-policy-institute.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 76, "networkReach": 77, "updatePriority": 68, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 74, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Australian Strategic Policy Institute is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 76/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Australian Strategic Policy Institute unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 76, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Australian Strategic Policy Institute." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "observer-research-foundation", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 39, "name": "Observer Research Foundation", "suit": "Swords", "score": 75, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/observer-research-foundation.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 75, "networkReach": 76, "updatePriority": 67, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 73, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Observer Research Foundation is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 75/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Observer Research Foundation unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 75, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Observer Research Foundation." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "institute-for-defence-studies-and-analyses", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 40, "name": "Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses", "suit": "Masks", "score": 84, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/institute-for-defence-studies-and-analyses.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "japan-institute-of-international-affairs", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 41, "name": "Japan Institute of International Affairs", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 83, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/japan-institute-of-international-affairs.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 83, "networkReach": 84, "updatePriority": 75, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 81, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Japan Institute of International Affairs is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 83/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Japan Institute of International Affairs unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 83, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Japan Institute of International Affairs." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "korea-institute-for-national-unification", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 42, "name": "Korea Institute for National Unification", "suit": "Coins", "score": 82, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/korea-institute-for-national-unification.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Korea Institute for National Unification is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Korea Institute for National Unification unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Korea Institute for National Unification." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "china-institutes-of-contemporary-international-relations", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 43, "name": "China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations", "suit": "Swords", "score": 81, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/china-institutes-of-contemporary-international-relations.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 81, "networkReach": 82, "updatePriority": 73, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 79, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 81/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 81, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "chinese-academy-of-social-sciences", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 44, "name": "Chinese Academy of Social Sciences", "suit": "Masks", "score": 80, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/chinese-academy-of-social-sciences.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Chinese Academy of Social Sciences is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Chinese Academy of Social Sciences unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Chinese Academy of Social Sciences." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "carnegie-china-route", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 45, "name": "Carnegie China route", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 79, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/carnegie-china-route.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 79, "networkReach": 80, "updatePriority": 71, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 77, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Carnegie China route is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 79/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Carnegie China route unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 79, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Carnegie China route." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "kiel-institute-for-the-world-economy", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 46, "name": "Kiel Institute for the World Economy", "suit": "Coins", "score": 78, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/kiel-institute-for-the-world-economy.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Kiel Institute for the World Economy is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Kiel Institute for the World Economy unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Kiel Institute for the World Economy." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "ifo-institute", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 47, "name": "Ifo Institute", "suit": "Swords", "score": 77, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/ifo-institute.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 77, "networkReach": 78, "updatePriority": 69, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 75, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Ifo Institute is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 77/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Ifo Institute unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 77, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Ifo Institute." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "club-of-rome", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 48, "name": "Club of Rome", "suit": "Masks", "score": 76, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/club-of-rome.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 76, "networkReach": 77, "updatePriority": 68, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 74, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Club of Rome is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 76/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Club of Rome unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 76, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Club of Rome." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "world-economic-forum-policy-platform", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 49, "name": "World Economic Forum policy platform", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 75, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/world-economic-forum-policy-platform.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 75, "networkReach": 76, "updatePriority": 67, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 73, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "World Economic Forum policy platform is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 75/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for World Economic Forum policy platform unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 75, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to World Economic Forum policy platform." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bis-research-route", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 50, "name": "BIS research route", "suit": "Coins", "score": 74, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/bis-research-route.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 74, "networkReach": 75, "updatePriority": 66, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 72, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "BIS research route is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 74/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for BIS research route unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 74, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to BIS research route." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "imf-policy-research-route", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 51, "name": "IMF policy research route", "suit": "Swords", "score": 73, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/imf-policy-research-route.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 73, "networkReach": 74, "updatePriority": 65, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 71, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "IMF policy research route is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 73/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for IMF policy research route unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 73, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to IMF policy research route." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "oecd-policy-research-route", "deckId": "think-tanks", "deckTitle": "Think Tanks Deck", "rank": 52, "name": "OECD policy research route", "suit": "Masks", "score": 72, "lane": "think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route", "route": "think-tanks/oecd-policy-research-route.html", "sourceFile": "data/think-tanks-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 72, "networkReach": 73, "updatePriority": 64, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 70, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "OECD policy research route is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the think-tanks deck. The card points readers toward think tank, policy shop, research institute or public-policy platform route. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 72/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for OECD policy research route unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 72, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to OECD policy research route." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] } ], "black-nobility": [ { "id": "orsini", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 1, "name": "Orsini", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 94, "lane": "Roman / papal nobility", "route": "black-nobility/orsini.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 94, "networkReach": 95, "updatePriority": 94, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 92, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Orsini is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward Roman / papal nobility. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 94/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Orsini unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 94, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Orsini." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "colonna", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 2, "name": "Colonna", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 93, "lane": "Roman / papal nobility", "route": "black-nobility/colonna.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 93, "networkReach": 94, "updatePriority": 93, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 91, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Colonna is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward Roman / papal nobility. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 93/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Colonna unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 93, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Colonna." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "borghese", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 3, "name": "Borghese", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 92, "lane": "Roman / papal nobility", "route": "black-nobility/borghese.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 92, "networkReach": 93, "updatePriority": 92, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 90, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Borghese is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward Roman / papal nobility. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 92/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Borghese unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 92, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Borghese." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "barberini", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 4, "name": "Barberini", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 91, "lane": "Roman / papal nobility", "route": "black-nobility/barberini.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 91, "networkReach": 92, "updatePriority": 91, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 89, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Barberini is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward Roman / papal nobility. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 91/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Barberini unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 91, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Barberini." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "chigi", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 5, "name": "Chigi", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 90, "lane": "Roman / papal nobility", "route": "black-nobility/chigi.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 90, "networkReach": 91, "updatePriority": 90, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 88, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Chigi is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward Roman / papal nobility. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 90/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Chigi unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 90, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Chigi." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "aldobrandini", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 6, "name": "Aldobrandini", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 89, "lane": "Roman / papal nobility", "route": "black-nobility/aldobrandini.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 89, "networkReach": 90, "updatePriority": 89, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 87, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Aldobrandini is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward Roman / papal nobility. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 89/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Aldobrandini unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 89, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Aldobrandini." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "pamphilj", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 7, "name": "Pamphilj", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 88, "lane": "Roman / papal nobility", "route": "black-nobility/pamphilj.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 88, "networkReach": 89, "updatePriority": 80, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 86, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Pamphilj is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward Roman / papal nobility. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 88/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Pamphilj unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 88, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Pamphilj." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "odescalchi", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 8, "name": "Odescalchi", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 87, "lane": "Roman / papal nobility", "route": "black-nobility/odescalchi.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 87, "networkReach": 88, "updatePriority": 79, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 85, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Odescalchi is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward Roman / papal nobility. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 87/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Odescalchi unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 87, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Odescalchi." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "massimo", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 9, "name": "Massimo", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 86, "lane": "Roman / papal nobility", "route": "black-nobility/massimo.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 86, "networkReach": 87, "updatePriority": 78, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 84, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Massimo is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward Roman / papal nobility. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 86/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Massimo unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 86, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Massimo." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "ruspoli", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 10, "name": "Ruspoli", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 85, "lane": "Roman / papal nobility", "route": "black-nobility/ruspoli.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 85, "networkReach": 86, "updatePriority": 77, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 83, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Ruspoli is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward Roman / papal nobility. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 85/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Ruspoli unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 85, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Ruspoli." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "torlonia", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 11, "name": "Torlonia", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 84, "lane": "Roman / papal nobility", "route": "black-nobility/torlonia.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Torlonia is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward Roman / papal nobility. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Torlonia unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Torlonia." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "caetani", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 12, "name": "Caetani", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 83, "lane": "Roman / papal nobility", "route": "black-nobility/caetani.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 83, "networkReach": 84, "updatePriority": 75, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 81, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Caetani is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward Roman / papal nobility. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 83/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Caetani unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 83, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Caetani." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "boncompagni-ludovisi", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 13, "name": "Boncompagni Ludovisi", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 82, "lane": "Roman / papal nobility", "route": "black-nobility/boncompagni-ludovisi.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Boncompagni Ludovisi is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward Roman / papal nobility. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Boncompagni Ludovisi unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Boncompagni Ludovisi." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "doria", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 14, "name": "Doria", "suit": "Coins", "score": 88, "lane": "merchant, banking and maritime nobility", "route": "black-nobility/doria.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 88, "networkReach": 89, "updatePriority": 80, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 86, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Doria is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward merchant, banking and maritime nobility. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 88/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Doria unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 88, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Doria." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "spinola", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 15, "name": "Spinola", "suit": "Coins", "score": 87, "lane": "merchant, banking and maritime nobility", "route": "black-nobility/spinola.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 87, "networkReach": 88, "updatePriority": 79, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 85, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Spinola is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward merchant, banking and maritime nobility. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 87/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Spinola unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 87, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Spinola." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "giustiniani", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 16, "name": "Giustiniani", "suit": "Coins", "score": 86, "lane": "merchant, banking and maritime nobility", "route": "black-nobility/giustiniani.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 86, "networkReach": 87, "updatePriority": 78, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 84, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Giustiniani is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward merchant, banking and maritime nobility. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 86/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Giustiniani unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 86, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Giustiniani." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "contarini", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 17, "name": "Contarini", "suit": "Coins", "score": 85, "lane": "merchant, banking and maritime nobility", "route": "black-nobility/contarini.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 85, "networkReach": 86, "updatePriority": 77, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 83, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Contarini is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward merchant, banking and maritime nobility. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 85/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Contarini unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 85, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Contarini." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "mocenigo", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 18, "name": "Mocenigo", "suit": "Coins", "score": 84, "lane": "merchant, banking and maritime nobility", "route": "black-nobility/mocenigo.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Mocenigo is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward merchant, banking and maritime nobility. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Mocenigo unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Mocenigo." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "cornaro", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 19, "name": "Cornaro", "suit": "Coins", "score": 83, "lane": "merchant, banking and maritime nobility", "route": "black-nobility/cornaro.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 83, "networkReach": 84, "updatePriority": 75, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 81, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Cornaro is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward merchant, banking and maritime nobility. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 83/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Cornaro unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 83, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Cornaro." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "morosini", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 20, "name": "Morosini", "suit": "Coins", "score": 82, "lane": "merchant, banking and maritime nobility", "route": "black-nobility/morosini.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Morosini is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward merchant, banking and maritime nobility. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Morosini unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Morosini." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "loredan", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 21, "name": "Loredan", "suit": "Coins", "score": 81, "lane": "merchant, banking and maritime nobility", "route": "black-nobility/loredan.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 81, "networkReach": 82, "updatePriority": 73, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 79, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Loredan is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward merchant, banking and maritime nobility. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 81/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Loredan unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 81, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Loredan." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "gritti", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 22, "name": "Gritti", "suit": "Coins", "score": 80, "lane": "merchant, banking and maritime nobility", "route": "black-nobility/gritti.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Gritti is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward merchant, banking and maritime nobility. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Gritti unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Gritti." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "vendramin", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 23, "name": "Vendramin", "suit": "Coins", "score": 79, "lane": "merchant, banking and maritime nobility", "route": "black-nobility/vendramin.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 79, "networkReach": 80, "updatePriority": 71, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 77, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Vendramin is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward merchant, banking and maritime nobility. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 79/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Vendramin unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 79, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Vendramin." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bragadin", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 24, "name": "Bragadin", "suit": "Coins", "score": 78, "lane": "merchant, banking and maritime nobility", "route": "black-nobility/bragadin.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Bragadin is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward merchant, banking and maritime nobility. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Bragadin unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Bragadin." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "querini", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 25, "name": "Querini", "suit": "Coins", "score": 77, "lane": "merchant, banking and maritime nobility", "route": "black-nobility/querini.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 77, "networkReach": 78, "updatePriority": 69, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 75, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Querini is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward merchant, banking and maritime nobility. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 77/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Querini unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 77, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Querini." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "pisani", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 26, "name": "Pisani", "suit": "Coins", "score": 76, "lane": "merchant, banking and maritime nobility", "route": "black-nobility/pisani.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 76, "networkReach": 77, "updatePriority": 68, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 74, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Pisani is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward merchant, banking and maritime nobility. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 76/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Pisani unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 76, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Pisani." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "medici", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 27, "name": "Medici", "suit": "Swords", "score": 84, "lane": "territorial, princely and martial houses", "route": "black-nobility/medici.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Medici is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward territorial, princely and martial houses. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Medici unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Medici." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "este", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 28, "name": "Este", "suit": "Swords", "score": 83, "lane": "territorial, princely and martial houses", "route": "black-nobility/este.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 83, "networkReach": 84, "updatePriority": 75, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 81, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Este is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward territorial, princely and martial houses. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 83/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Este unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 83, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Este." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "gonzaga", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 29, "name": "Gonzaga", "suit": "Swords", "score": 82, "lane": "territorial, princely and martial houses", "route": "black-nobility/gonzaga.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Gonzaga is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward territorial, princely and martial houses. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Gonzaga unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Gonzaga." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "sforza", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 30, "name": "Sforza", "suit": "Swords", "score": 81, "lane": "territorial, princely and martial houses", "route": "black-nobility/sforza.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 81, "networkReach": 82, "updatePriority": 73, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 79, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Sforza is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward territorial, princely and martial houses. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 81/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Sforza unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 81, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Sforza." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "visconti", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 31, "name": "Visconti", "suit": "Swords", "score": 80, "lane": "territorial, princely and martial houses", "route": "black-nobility/visconti.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Visconti is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward territorial, princely and martial houses. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Visconti unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Visconti." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "farnese", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 32, "name": "Farnese", "suit": "Swords", "score": 79, "lane": "territorial, princely and martial houses", "route": "black-nobility/farnese.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 79, "networkReach": 80, "updatePriority": 71, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 77, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Farnese is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward territorial, princely and martial houses. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 79/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Farnese unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 79, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Farnese." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "savoy", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 33, "name": "Savoy", "suit": "Swords", "score": 78, "lane": "territorial, princely and martial houses", "route": "black-nobility/savoy.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Savoy is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward territorial, princely and martial houses. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Savoy unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Savoy." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "grimaldi", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 34, "name": "Grimaldi", "suit": "Swords", "score": 77, "lane": "territorial, princely and martial houses", "route": "black-nobility/grimaldi.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 77, "networkReach": 78, "updatePriority": 69, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 75, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Grimaldi is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward territorial, princely and martial houses. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 77/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Grimaldi unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 77, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Grimaldi." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "pallavicini", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 35, "name": "Pallavicini", "suit": "Swords", "score": 76, "lane": "territorial, princely and martial houses", "route": "black-nobility/pallavicini.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 76, "networkReach": 77, "updatePriority": 68, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 74, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Pallavicini is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward territorial, princely and martial houses. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 76/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Pallavicini unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 76, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Pallavicini." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "malaspina", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 36, "name": "Malaspina", "suit": "Swords", "score": 75, "lane": "territorial, princely and martial houses", "route": "black-nobility/malaspina.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 75, "networkReach": 76, "updatePriority": 67, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 73, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Malaspina is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward territorial, princely and martial houses. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 75/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Malaspina unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 75, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Malaspina." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bentivoglio", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 37, "name": "Bentivoglio", "suit": "Swords", "score": 74, "lane": "territorial, princely and martial houses", "route": "black-nobility/bentivoglio.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 74, "networkReach": 75, "updatePriority": 66, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 72, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Bentivoglio is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward territorial, princely and martial houses. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 74/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Bentivoglio unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 74, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Bentivoglio." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "montefeltro", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 38, "name": "Montefeltro", "suit": "Swords", "score": 73, "lane": "territorial, princely and martial houses", "route": "black-nobility/montefeltro.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 73, "networkReach": 74, "updatePriority": 65, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 71, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Montefeltro is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward territorial, princely and martial houses. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 73/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Montefeltro unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 73, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Montefeltro." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "della-rovere", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 39, "name": "della Rovere", "suit": "Swords", "score": 72, "lane": "territorial, princely and martial houses", "route": "black-nobility/della-rovere.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 72, "networkReach": 73, "updatePriority": 64, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 70, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "della Rovere is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward territorial, princely and martial houses. The Swords suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 72/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for della Rovere unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 72, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to della Rovere." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "habsburg-lorraine", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 40, "name": "Habsburg-Lorraine", "suit": "Masks", "score": 80, "lane": "allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks", "route": "black-nobility/habsburg-lorraine.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Habsburg-Lorraine is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Habsburg-Lorraine unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Habsburg-Lorraine." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bourbon-two-sicilies", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 41, "name": "Bourbon-Two Sicilies", "suit": "Masks", "score": 79, "lane": "allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks", "route": "black-nobility/bourbon-two-sicilies.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 79, "networkReach": 80, "updatePriority": 71, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 77, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Bourbon-Two Sicilies is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 79/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Bourbon-Two Sicilies unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 79, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Bourbon-Two Sicilies." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bourbon-parma", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 42, "name": "Bourbon-Parma", "suit": "Masks", "score": 78, "lane": "allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks", "route": "black-nobility/bourbon-parma.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Bourbon-Parma is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Bourbon-Parma unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Bourbon-Parma." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "liechtenstein", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 43, "name": "Liechtenstein", "suit": "Masks", "score": 77, "lane": "allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks", "route": "black-nobility/liechtenstein.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 77, "networkReach": 78, "updatePriority": 69, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 75, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Liechtenstein is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 77/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Liechtenstein unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 77, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Liechtenstein." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "schwarzenberg", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 44, "name": "Schwarzenberg", "suit": "Masks", "score": 76, "lane": "allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks", "route": "black-nobility/schwarzenberg.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 76, "networkReach": 77, "updatePriority": 68, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 74, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Schwarzenberg is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 76/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Schwarzenberg unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 76, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Schwarzenberg." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "lobkowicz", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 45, "name": "Lobkowicz", "suit": "Masks", "score": 75, "lane": "allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks", "route": "black-nobility/lobkowicz.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 75, "networkReach": 76, "updatePriority": 67, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 73, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Lobkowicz is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 75/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Lobkowicz unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 75, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Lobkowicz." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "thurn-und-taxis", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 46, "name": "Thurn und Taxis", "suit": "Masks", "score": 74, "lane": "allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks", "route": "black-nobility/thurn-und-taxis.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 74, "networkReach": 75, "updatePriority": 66, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 72, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Thurn und Taxis is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 74/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Thurn und Taxis unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 74, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Thurn und Taxis." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "braganza", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 47, "name": "Braganza", "suit": "Masks", "score": 73, "lane": "allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks", "route": "black-nobility/braganza.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 73, "networkReach": 74, "updatePriority": 65, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 71, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Braganza is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 73/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Braganza unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 73, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Braganza." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "wittelsbach", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 48, "name": "Wittelsbach", "suit": "Masks", "score": 72, "lane": "allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks", "route": "black-nobility/wittelsbach.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 72, "networkReach": 73, "updatePriority": 64, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 70, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Wittelsbach is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 72/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Wittelsbach unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 72, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Wittelsbach." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "hohenzollern-sigmaringen", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 49, "name": "Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen", "suit": "Masks", "score": 71, "lane": "allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks", "route": "black-nobility/hohenzollern-sigmaringen.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 71, "networkReach": 72, "updatePriority": 63, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 69, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 71/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 71, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "orange-nassau", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 50, "name": "Orange-Nassau", "suit": "Masks", "score": 70, "lane": "allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks", "route": "black-nobility/orange-nassau.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 70, "networkReach": 71, "updatePriority": 62, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 68, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Orange-Nassau is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 70/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Orange-Nassau unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 70, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Orange-Nassau." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "oldenburg", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 51, "name": "Oldenburg", "suit": "Masks", "score": 69, "lane": "allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks", "route": "black-nobility/oldenburg.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 69, "networkReach": 70, "updatePriority": 61, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 67, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Oldenburg is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 69/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Oldenburg unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 69, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Oldenburg." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "arenberg", "deckId": "black-nobility", "deckTitle": "Black Nobility & Allied Dynasties Deck", "rank": 52, "name": "Arenberg", "suit": "Masks", "score": 68, "lane": "allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks", "route": "black-nobility/arenberg.html", "sourceFile": "data/black-nobility-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 68, "networkReach": 69, "updatePriority": 60, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 66, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Arenberg is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the black-nobility deck. The card points readers toward allied dynasties and extended aristocratic networks. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 68/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Arenberg unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 68, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Arenberg." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] } ], "jurisdictions-of-power": [ { "id": "vatican-city-holy-see", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 1, "name": "Vatican City / Holy See", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 98, "lane": "sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/vatican-city-holy-see.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 98, "networkReach": 99, "updatePriority": 98, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 96, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Vatican City / Holy See is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 98/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Vatican City / Holy See unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 98, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Vatican City / Holy See." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "city-of-london", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 2, "name": "City of London", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 97, "lane": "sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/city-of-london.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 97, "networkReach": 98, "updatePriority": 97, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 95, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "City of London is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 97/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for City of London unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 97, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to City of London." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "washington-d-c", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 3, "name": "Washington, D.C.", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 96, "lane": "sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/washington-d-c.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 96, "networkReach": 97, "updatePriority": 96, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 94, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Washington, D.C. is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 96/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Washington, D.C. unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 96, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Washington, D.C.." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "brussels-eu-quarter", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 4, "name": "Brussels / EU Quarter", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 95, "lane": "sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/brussels-eu-quarter.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 95, "networkReach": 96, "updatePriority": 95, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 93, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Brussels / EU Quarter is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 95/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Brussels / EU Quarter unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 95, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Brussels / EU Quarter." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "geneva", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 5, "name": "Geneva", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 94, "lane": "sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/geneva.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 94, "networkReach": 95, "updatePriority": 94, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 92, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Geneva is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 94/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Geneva unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 94, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Geneva." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "new-york-city", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 6, "name": "New York City", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 93, "lane": "sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/new-york-city.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 93, "networkReach": 94, "updatePriority": 93, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 91, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "New York City is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 93/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for New York City unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 93, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to New York City." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "basel", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 7, "name": "Basel", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 92, "lane": "sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/basel.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 92, "networkReach": 93, "updatePriority": 92, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 90, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Basel is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 92/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Basel unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 92, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Basel." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "frankfurt", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 8, "name": "Frankfurt", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 91, "lane": "sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/frankfurt.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 91, "networkReach": 92, "updatePriority": 91, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 89, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Frankfurt is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 91/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Frankfurt unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 91, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Frankfurt." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "the-hague", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 9, "name": "The Hague", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 90, "lane": "sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/the-hague.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 90, "networkReach": 91, "updatePriority": 90, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 88, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "The Hague is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 90/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for The Hague unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 90, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to The Hague." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "paris-oecd-fatf-route", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 10, "name": "Paris / OECD-FATF Route", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 89, "lane": "sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/paris-oecd-fatf-route.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 89, "networkReach": 90, "updatePriority": 89, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 87, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Paris / OECD-FATF Route is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 89/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Paris / OECD-FATF Route unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 89, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Paris / OECD-FATF Route." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "beijing", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 11, "name": "Beijing", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 88, "lane": "sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/beijing.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 88, "networkReach": 89, "updatePriority": 80, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 86, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Beijing is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 88/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Beijing unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 88, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Beijing." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "moscow", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 12, "name": "Moscow", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 87, "lane": "sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/moscow.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 87, "networkReach": 88, "updatePriority": 79, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 85, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Moscow is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 87/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Moscow unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 87, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Moscow." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "riyadh", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 13, "name": "Riyadh", "suit": "Crowns", "score": 86, "lane": "sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/riyadh.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 86, "networkReach": 87, "updatePriority": 78, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 84, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Riyadh is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward sovereign, diplomatic and supranational command seats. The Crowns suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 86/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Riyadh unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 86, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Riyadh." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "cayman-islands", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 14, "name": "Cayman Islands", "suit": "Coins", "score": 91, "lane": "financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/cayman-islands.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "high", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 91, "networkReach": 92, "updatePriority": 91, "evidenceRoute": 86, "narrativeSignal": 89, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Cayman Islands is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 91/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Cayman Islands unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 91, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Cayman Islands." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "british-virgin-islands", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 15, "name": "British Virgin Islands", "suit": "Coins", "score": 90, "lane": "financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/british-virgin-islands.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 90, "networkReach": 91, "updatePriority": 90, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 88, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "British Virgin Islands is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 90/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for British Virgin Islands unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 90, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to British Virgin Islands." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bermuda", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 16, "name": "Bermuda", "suit": "Coins", "score": 89, "lane": "financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/bermuda.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 89, "networkReach": 90, "updatePriority": 89, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 87, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Bermuda is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 89/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Bermuda unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 89, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Bermuda." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "luxembourg", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 17, "name": "Luxembourg", "suit": "Coins", "score": 88, "lane": "financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/luxembourg.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 88, "networkReach": 89, "updatePriority": 80, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 86, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Luxembourg is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 88/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Luxembourg unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 88, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Luxembourg." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "switzerland", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 18, "name": "Switzerland", "suit": "Coins", "score": 87, "lane": "financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/switzerland.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 87, "networkReach": 88, "updatePriority": 79, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 85, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Switzerland is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 87/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Switzerland unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 87, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Switzerland." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "singapore", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 19, "name": "Singapore", "suit": "Coins", "score": 86, "lane": "financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/singapore.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 86, "networkReach": 87, "updatePriority": 78, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 84, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Singapore is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 86/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Singapore unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 86, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Singapore." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "hong-kong", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 20, "name": "Hong Kong", "suit": "Coins", "score": 85, "lane": "financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/hong-kong.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 85, "networkReach": 86, "updatePriority": 77, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 83, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Hong Kong is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 85/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Hong Kong unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 85, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Hong Kong." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "netherlands", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 21, "name": "Netherlands", "suit": "Coins", "score": 84, "lane": "financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/netherlands.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Netherlands is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Netherlands unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Netherlands." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "ireland", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 22, "name": "Ireland", "suit": "Coins", "score": 83, "lane": "financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/ireland.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 83, "networkReach": 84, "updatePriority": 75, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 81, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Ireland is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 83/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Ireland unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 83, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Ireland." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "delaware", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 23, "name": "Delaware", "suit": "Coins", "score": 82, "lane": "financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/delaware.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Delaware is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Delaware unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Delaware." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "jersey", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 24, "name": "Jersey", "suit": "Coins", "score": 81, "lane": "financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/jersey.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 81, "networkReach": 82, "updatePriority": 73, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 79, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Jersey is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 81/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Jersey unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 81, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Jersey." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "guernsey", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 25, "name": "Guernsey", "suit": "Coins", "score": 80, "lane": "financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/guernsey.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Guernsey is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Guernsey unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Guernsey." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "isle-of-man", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 26, "name": "Isle of Man", "suit": "Coins", "score": 79, "lane": "financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/isle-of-man.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 79, "networkReach": 80, "updatePriority": 71, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 77, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Isle of Man is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward financial centres, tax treaty routes and offshore capital lanes. The Coins suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 79/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Isle of Man unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 79, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Isle of Man." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "dubai-difc", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 27, "name": "Dubai / DIFC", "suit": "Courts", "score": 84, "lane": "legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/dubai-difc.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 84, "networkReach": 85, "updatePriority": 76, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 82, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Dubai / DIFC is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues. The Courts suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 84/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Dubai / DIFC unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 84, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Dubai / DIFC." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "abu-dhabi-adgm", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 28, "name": "Abu Dhabi / ADGM", "suit": "Courts", "score": 83, "lane": "legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/abu-dhabi-adgm.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 83, "networkReach": 84, "updatePriority": 75, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 81, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Abu Dhabi / ADGM is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues. The Courts suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 83/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Abu Dhabi / ADGM unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 83, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Abu Dhabi / ADGM." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "monaco", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 29, "name": "Monaco", "suit": "Courts", "score": 82, "lane": "legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/monaco.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Monaco is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues. The Courts suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Monaco unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Monaco." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "liechtenstein", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 30, "name": "Liechtenstein", "suit": "Courts", "score": 81, "lane": "legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/liechtenstein.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 81, "networkReach": 82, "updatePriority": 73, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 79, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Liechtenstein is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues. The Courts suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 81/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Liechtenstein unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 81, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Liechtenstein." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "panama", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 31, "name": "Panama", "suit": "Courts", "score": 80, "lane": "legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/panama.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 80, "networkReach": 81, "updatePriority": 72, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 78, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Panama is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues. The Courts suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 80/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Panama unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 80, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Panama." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bahamas", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 32, "name": "Bahamas", "suit": "Courts", "score": 79, "lane": "legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/bahamas.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 79, "networkReach": 80, "updatePriority": 71, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 77, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Bahamas is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues. The Courts suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 79/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Bahamas unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 79, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Bahamas." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "malta", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 33, "name": "Malta", "suit": "Courts", "score": 78, "lane": "legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/malta.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 78, "networkReach": 79, "updatePriority": 70, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 76, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Malta is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues. The Courts suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 78/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Malta unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 78, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Malta." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "cyprus", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 34, "name": "Cyprus", "suit": "Courts", "score": 77, "lane": "legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/cyprus.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 77, "networkReach": 78, "updatePriority": 69, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 75, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Cyprus is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues. The Courts suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 77/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Cyprus unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 77, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Cyprus." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "mauritius", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 35, "name": "Mauritius", "suit": "Courts", "score": 76, "lane": "legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/mauritius.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 76, "networkReach": 77, "updatePriority": 68, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 74, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Mauritius is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues. The Courts suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 76/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Mauritius unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 76, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Mauritius." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "seychelles", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 36, "name": "Seychelles", "suit": "Courts", "score": 75, "lane": "legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/seychelles.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 75, "networkReach": 76, "updatePriority": 67, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 73, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Seychelles is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues. The Courts suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 75/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Seychelles unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 75, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Seychelles." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "belize", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 37, "name": "Belize", "suit": "Courts", "score": 74, "lane": "legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/belize.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 74, "networkReach": 75, "updatePriority": 66, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 72, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Belize is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues. The Courts suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 74/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Belize unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 74, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Belize." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "gibraltar", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 38, "name": "Gibraltar", "suit": "Courts", "score": 73, "lane": "legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/gibraltar.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 73, "networkReach": 74, "updatePriority": 65, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 71, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Gibraltar is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues. The Courts suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 73/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Gibraltar unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 73, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Gibraltar." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "andorra", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 39, "name": "Andorra", "suit": "Courts", "score": 72, "lane": "legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/andorra.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 72, "networkReach": 73, "updatePriority": 64, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 70, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Andorra is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues. The Courts suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 72/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Andorra unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 72, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Andorra." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "san-marino", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 40, "name": "San Marino", "suit": "Courts", "score": 82, "lane": "legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/san-marino.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 82, "networkReach": 83, "updatePriority": 74, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 80, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "San Marino is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward legal, corporate, arbitration and regulatory venues. The Courts suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 82/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for San Marino unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 82, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to San Marino." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "macau", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 41, "name": "Macau", "suit": "Masks", "score": 77, "lane": "special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/macau.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 77, "networkReach": 78, "updatePriority": 69, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 75, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Macau is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 77/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Macau unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 77, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Macau." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "labuan", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 42, "name": "Labuan", "suit": "Masks", "score": 76, "lane": "special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/labuan.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 76, "networkReach": 77, "updatePriority": 68, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 74, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Labuan is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 76/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Labuan unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 76, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Labuan." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "cook-islands", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 43, "name": "Cook Islands", "suit": "Masks", "score": 75, "lane": "special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/cook-islands.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 75, "networkReach": 76, "updatePriority": 67, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 73, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Cook Islands is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 75/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Cook Islands unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 75, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Cook Islands." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "marshall-islands", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 44, "name": "Marshall Islands", "suit": "Masks", "score": 74, "lane": "special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/marshall-islands.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 74, "networkReach": 75, "updatePriority": 66, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 72, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Marshall Islands is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 74/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Marshall Islands unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 74, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Marshall Islands." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "st-kitts-and-nevis", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 45, "name": "St Kitts and Nevis", "suit": "Masks", "score": 73, "lane": "special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/st-kitts-and-nevis.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 73, "networkReach": 74, "updatePriority": 65, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 71, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "St Kitts and Nevis is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 73/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for St Kitts and Nevis unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 73, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to St Kitts and Nevis." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "turks-and-caicos-islands", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 46, "name": "Turks and Caicos Islands", "suit": "Masks", "score": 72, "lane": "special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/turks-and-caicos-islands.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "medium", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 72, "networkReach": 73, "updatePriority": 64, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 70, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Turks and Caicos Islands is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 72/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Turks and Caicos Islands unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 72, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Turks and Caicos Islands." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "anguilla", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 47, "name": "Anguilla", "suit": "Masks", "score": 71, "lane": "special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/anguilla.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 71, "networkReach": 72, "updatePriority": 63, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 69, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Anguilla is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 71/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Anguilla unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 71, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Anguilla." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "samoa", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 48, "name": "Samoa", "suit": "Masks", "score": 70, "lane": "special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/samoa.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 70, "networkReach": 71, "updatePriority": 62, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 68, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Samoa is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 70/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Samoa unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 70, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Samoa." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "vanuatu", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 49, "name": "Vanuatu", "suit": "Masks", "score": 69, "lane": "special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/vanuatu.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 69, "networkReach": 70, "updatePriority": 61, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 67, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Vanuatu is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 69/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Vanuatu unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 69, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Vanuatu." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "bahrain", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 50, "name": "Bahrain", "suit": "Masks", "score": 68, "lane": "special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/bahrain.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 68, "networkReach": 69, "updatePriority": 60, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 66, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Bahrain is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 68/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Bahrain unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 68, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Bahrain." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "qatar-financial-centre", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 51, "name": "Qatar Financial Centre", "suit": "Masks", "score": 67, "lane": "special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/qatar-financial-centre.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 67, "networkReach": 68, "updatePriority": 59, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 65, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Qatar Financial Centre is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 67/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Qatar Financial Centre unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 67, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Qatar Financial Centre." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] }, { "id": "astana-international-financial-centre", "deckId": "jurisdictions-of-power", "deckTitle": "Jurisdictions of Power Deck", "rank": 52, "name": "Astana International Financial Centre", "suit": "Masks", "score": 66, "lane": "special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways", "route": "jurisdictions-of-power/astana-international-financial-centre.html", "sourceFile": "data/jurisdictions-of-power-deck.json", "scoreModel": { "version": "1.5", "scoreType": "relevance-and-update-priority", "confidence": "watch", "dimensions": { "publicRole": 66, "networkReach": 67, "updatePriority": 58, "evidenceRoute": 78, "narrativeSignal": 64, "relationshipRoute": 42 }, "explanation": "Scores rank research relevance, public role, source-route strength, relationship-route priority and update priority. They do not measure guilt, intent, secret control or wrongdoing." }, "speculativeRationale": "Astana International Financial Centre is included because it is a high-relevance public-record route in the jurisdictions-of-power deck. The card points readers toward special zones, enclaves, ports and strategic administrative gateways. The Masks suit marks the first investigation lane, and the 66/100 score is a relevance and update-priority indicator, not an accusation score. This card has a route into the site database or dossier layer. This is a speculative routing rationale for research navigation, not a factual allegation, proof of intent, or claim of wrongdoing.", "sourceRelationshipRules": { "status": "no reviewed public-source entry yet", "entries": [], "requirements": [ "public source route", "clear relationship or record type", "date range when available", "what the source shows", "what the source does not show" ], "boundary": "No relationship or source entry should be listed for Astana International Financial Centre unless it is documented by a public source route. A documented relationship does not prove shared intent, knowledge or wrongdoing.", "submissionPrompt": "Readers may submit public-source leads through the card forum. Leads must be reviewed before being added." }, "feedItems": [ { "type": "monitor", "weight": 66, "title": "Watch for public-record changes", "summary": "Track new public records, official statements, corrections, archived material and reliable reporting related to Astana International Financial Centre." }, { "type": "route", "weight": 88, "title": "Source route priority", "summary": "This card already has a route into the site database or related dossier pages." }, { "type": "relationship", "weight": 50, "title": "Documented relationship lane", "summary": "Only list relationship entries when supported by public source routes. Do not infer guilt by association." }, { "type": "boundary", "weight": 100, "title": "Evidence boundary", "summary": "Keep claims separated from speculation. User submissions are leads until reviewed." } ], "updateTriggers": [ "new public-record source", "reliable correction or counter-evidence", "new database route", "broken link report", "reader-submitted source lead", "major public statement or policy change", "reviewed source involving a documented relationship" ] } ] } }