# Entity Exposure Index Updated: 2026-07-07T17:02:42.119Z ## Supreme Court of the United States Score: 368 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: Supreme Court of the United States deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## 25-365 Score: 358 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: 25-365 deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## [object Object] Score: 269 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: [object Object] deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York Score: 184 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Connecticut Appellate Court Score: 184 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: Connecticut Appellate Court deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Score: 184 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Court of Appeals of North Carolina Score: 184 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: Court of Appeals of North Carolina deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Health and Human Services Department Score: 184 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: Health and Human Services Department deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## 2024-07773 Score: 179 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: 2024-07773 deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## 25-113 Score: 179 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: 25-113 deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## 25-581 Score: 179 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: 25-581 deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## AC48383 Score: 179 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: AC48383 deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Biddle v. Biddle Score: 179 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: Biddle v. Biddle deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Khan v. Jewish Women International Score: 179 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: Khan v. Jewish Women International deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Matter of Pagliughi Score: 179 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: Matter of Pagliughi deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## The New York and Presbyterian Hospital v. New York State Nurses Association Score: 179 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: The New York and Presbyterian Hospital v. New York State Nurses Association deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Trump v. Barbara Score: 179 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: Trump v. Barbara deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Trump v. Barbara Revisions: 7/01/26 Score: 179 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: Trump v. Barbara Revisions: 7/01/26 deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Defense Department Score: 154 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: Defense Department deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Management and Budget Office Score: 154 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: Management and Budget Office deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## People's Republic of Bangladesh Score: 149 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: People's Republic of Bangladesh deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## National Aeronautics and Space Administration Score: 100 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: National Aeronautics and Space Administration deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Agency for International Development Score: 95 Level: high public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: Agency for International Development deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Agriculture Department Score: 95 Level: high public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: Agriculture Department deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Commerce Department Score: 95 Level: high public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: Commerce Department deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Energy Department Score: 95 Level: high public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: Energy Department deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Interior Department Score: 95 Level: high public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: Interior Department deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## State Department Score: 95 Level: high public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: State Department deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Transportation Department Score: 95 Level: high public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: Transportation Department deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Treasury Department Score: 95 Level: high public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: Treasury Department deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Veterans Affairs Department Score: 95 Level: high public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: Veterans Affairs Department deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Score: 89 Level: high public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Federal Procurement Policy Office Score: 79 Level: high public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: Federal Procurement Policy Office deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## General Services Administration Score: 60 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: General Services Administration deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Chattogram Water Supply and Sewerage Authority Score: 50 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: Chattogram Water Supply and Sewerage Authority deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Finance Division, Ministry of Finance Score: 50 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: Finance Division, Ministry of Finance deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Kingdom of Morocco Score: 50 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: Kingdom of Morocco deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Ministry of Agriculture, Maritime Fisheries, Rural Development, Water and Forests (MAPMDREF) Score: 50 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: Ministry of Agriculture, Maritime Fisheries, Rural Development, Water and Forests (MAPMDREF) deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Score: 50 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## AAPL Score: 45 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: AAPL deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Alphabet Inc. Score: 45 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: Alphabet Inc. deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## AMAZON COM INC Score: 45 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: AMAZON COM INC deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## AMZN Score: 45 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: AMZN deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Apple Inc. Score: 45 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: Apple Inc. deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## AVGO Score: 45 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: AVGO deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Broadcom Inc. Score: 45 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: Broadcom Inc. deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## GOOGL Score: 45 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: GOOGL deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## MICROSOFT CORP Score: 45 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: MICROSOFT CORP deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## MSFT Score: 45 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: MSFT deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## NVDA Score: 45 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: NVDA deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## NVIDIA CORP Score: 45 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: NVIDIA CORP deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Republic of India Score: 45 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: Republic of India deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Republic of Rwanda Score: 45 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: Republic of Rwanda deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Environmental Protection Agency Score: 40 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: Environmental Protection Agency deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Homeland Security Department Score: 40 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: Homeland Security Department deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Nuclear Regulatory Commission Score: 40 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: Nuclear Regulatory Commission deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## U.S. International Development Finance Corporation Score: 40 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: U.S. International Development Finance Corporation deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## United States Agency for Global Media Score: 40 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: United States Agency for Global Media deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing.